User talk:Phnicolas

Your submission at Articles for creation: The IT Press Tour (January 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The IT Press Tour and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:25, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Phnicolas, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 14:25, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The IT Press Tour

Hello, Phnicolas. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "The IT Press Tour".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13. An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rich^T|C|E-Mail 23:49, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:OpenIO-Logo GfA.png

Thanks for uploading File:OpenIO-Logo GfA.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:OpenIO logo.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:OpenIO logo.pdf. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:06, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:OIO Editions.png

Thanks for uploading File:OIO Editions.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at OpenIO, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 05:09, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Phnicolas. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article OpenIO, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Drm310 (talk) 05:09, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of OpenIO

Hello Phnicolas,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged OpenIO for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 16:52, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OpenIO

The overwhelming majority of your contributions are focused on promoting this company. You are not doing it any favors. To whatever extent that it actually belongs in other articles, they can be added by another editor who does not have such a blindingly obvious conflict of interest. Continue to insert references to it yourself and I will block you from editing. —Cryptic 19:36, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok understand even, I will ask someone outside of the project to add them if this your comment. But please justify and explain me why you have accepted employee (yes employee) to post articles about their company. I can point you to these articles. I don't get the rational here. Thx -- pnico 19:43, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, still don't understand why you removed this article, someone asked me to add references I added plenty of them. Again you maintain similar articles and you refuse this one. Could you tell me why ? there is no logic behind this ? I don't understand why you also removed the addtion to Object Storage article refering OpenIO like all other players or projects Thank you --pnico 19:40, 8 March 2016 (UTC)pnico — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phnicolas (talk • contribs)

There's a number of pithily-named essays I could point you at (WP:Don't add sewage to the already polluted pond, WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS) but the most basic reason is that the others at least attempt not to be overt marketing material. —Cryptic 19:47, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Harriet Coverston

The article Harriet Coverston has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability concerns. The only references are for her patents, and no substantial independent coverage of her found.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. power~enwiki (π, ν) 03:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello Phnicolas. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Object storage, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Phnicolas. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Phnicolas|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MrOllie (talk) 11:53, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ph. Nicolas Answer
Hello, I understand it could appear like that but it's not the case as I already published and gave to the community this picture/image/table without any payment at all, this is not the idea, this is a free contribution to the community. I own all the rights on the image as I built it. I historically published the first iteration in The Register in July 2016, several articles published for years on Wikipedia refers to this article without any problem at all (for instance see this article https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/OpenIO, in the references section that article is listed), and this new one was published recently as well on StorageNewsletter April 28, please see this link https://www.storagenewsletter.com/2021/04/28/timeline-for-object-storage/. This is given for free, no fee or sponsorship or any other compensation, the timeline is an effort to the community that doesn't exist anywhere else, it was the idea why I initially created it, to help the community and serve as a reference that can be used openly completely free of charge again. Of course I mentioned different sources and as you can see I list at least 50 companies so there is no promotion either on that for any storage vendors. Thank you to consider these points. As a general article on object storage with a part on history, it makes just sense to have this timeline included. pnico 14:53, 5 May 2021 (UTC)