User talk:Phantomsteve/Archives/2022/March
00:26, 6 March 2022 Phantomsteve talk contribs deleted page Koza - Yitzak Suknik (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://1943.pl/en/artykul/koza-part-3-to-pick-the-time-and-place-of-our-deaths/) (thank)
[edit]I am trying to find out why you have deleted my page when I have written the reason why it was incorrect to do so: This what I wrote:
'This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (I am the co-author of the original article http://1943.pl/en/artykul/koza-part-3-to-pick-the-time-and-place-of-our-deaths/ and we are creating a page on wikipedia that covers the three articles from the same website but with references and links) --JSKutcher (talk) 22:31, 6 March 2022 (UTC)'
Please restore the page or ask me further questions or verification that I am the author of the original item. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JSKutcher (talk • contribs) 22:31, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for contacting me, Jeff. I can see from the article that you are indeed the co-author, however the website shows that the text is copyrighted ("© 2022") and there is nothing that I can find that shows that text can be re-used elsewhere. Please see Granting us permission to copy material already online which explains how to give permission to reuse the text. Basically you can either place a notice explicitly on the webpage/site showing that the text can be re-used, or you can send an email from the domain to wikimedia granting this permission. Once this has been done and verified, it is possible to recreate the article. Again, the "Granting us permission" section will explain all this. PhantomSteve/talk¦contribs\ 09:21, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Koza article copyright infringement issue
[edit]1. Can you tell me what proof you require that the article I wrote is not a copyright infringement. The Warsaw Ghetto Museum support our work to write the article on Koza . They have seen the text of the article and it does not infringe their copyrights.
2. Another Wiki editor , Jimfbleak has the same issue . My question is how many other editors are there that could similarly delete the article in the future ?
Thank you
Jeff Kutcher
Jeff.Kutcher@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by JSKutcher (talk • contribs) 20:51, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Jeff, if you follow the link in my last message, you'll see there are two ways to show that we can use the material from the website here on Wikipedia:
- The website owners place a notice either on the page itself, or somewhere easily seen and linked to from the page, which states that the contents of the page are available under a suitable licensing such as CC-BY-SA (specific on suitable licensing is in the "Donating your material to Wikipedia" link above);
- An email from the domain that the Web page is on is sent to us giving that permission.
- Until we either see a suitable notice on the page, or get an email from an address verified as being from the web page's domain, any posting of the material is subject to deletion by any admin - and repeated attempts could ultimately end up with a permanent ban on its creation. Please read "Granting us permission to copy material already online", which explains exactly how to do one of the above. Thanks PhantomSteve/talk¦contribs\ 00:59, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:06, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 27 March 2022
[edit]- From the Signpost team: How The Signpost is documenting the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine
- News and notes: Of safety and anonymity
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Kharkiv, Ukraine: Countering Russian aggression with a camera
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Vinnytsia, Ukraine: War diary
- Eyewitness Wikimedian, Western Ukraine: Working with Wikipedia helps
- Disinformation report: The oligarchs' socks
- In the media: Ukraine, Russia, and even some other stuff
- Wikimedian perspective: My heroes from Russia, Ukraine & beyond
- Discussion report: Athletes are less notable now
- Technology report: 2022 Wikimedia Hackathon
- Arbitration report: Skeptics given heavenly judgement, whirlwind of Discord drama begins to spin for tropical cyclone editors
- Traffic report: War, what is it good for?
- Deletion report: Ukraine, werewolves, Ukraine, YouTube pundits, and Ukraine
- From the archives: Burn, baby burn
- Essay: Yes, the sky is blue
- Tips and tricks: Become a keyboard ninja
- On the bright side: The bright side of news