Jump to content

User talk:Petrovic-Njegos

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Petrovic-Njegos, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --HolyRomanEmperor 10:47, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Montenegro

[edit]

Hi Petrovic-Njegos. I see you've been adding things to the Montenegro Wikiportal. Only moderators can put stuff in the wikiportal. Your stuff that you put in was good but please, if you want to add stuff to the wikiportal, ask me or HolyRomanEmperor to become one of the moderators to add stuff. Warning: PLEASE DO NOT VANADLIZE THE WIKIPORTAL, Thank You. CrnaGora (Talk | Contribs | E-mail) 16:52, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:AHppl.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:AHppl.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:05, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Crna Gora

[edit]

Čestitam na nezavisnoj Crnoj Gori! Puno sreće! --Pockey 20:03, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CG Wikipedia

[edit]

Hey Petrovic-Njegos, there is currently a vote for a version of Wikipedia in Montenegrin. If you want to vote, go to meta:Requests for new languages. There you can vote. Ask your friends on Wikipedia (if you have any) who haven't voted to vote. Thanks. Crna Gora (Talk/Contribs/Edit Count) 21:18, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:BalkansFront1918.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:53, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

[edit]

You support the independence of Montenegro - but it's not jeoperdized. It's nice that you feel enthusiastic about a country's sovereignity - but what's the purpose if there's no reason?

Also, how's in Saudi Arabia? --PaxEquilibrium 20:52, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh... why do you live then there, if I may know? --PaxEquilibrium 10:52, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
P. S. Don't mind for the late answer. :) --PaxEquilibrium 10:52, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

[edit]
The Original Barnstar
For your hard work and dedication to improving Wikipedia, I, Sharkface217, hereby award you this Original Barnstar. Good job! Sharkface217 20:15, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Maine

[edit]

hi.. it says on your user page that you have been in Maine (and are also from montenegro). I am in Maine now, studying. I usually don't run into people who came to Maine for travel, it was either a business or school thing. What were you doing in Maine and where in Maine did you live/visit?

Svetlana Miljkovic 07:56, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

wikiproject

[edit]

As a member of WikiProject Serbia, you should be aware that the project as well as Portal:Serbia is being considered for deletion. If you have the time, please comment on what you feel should be done with the project and the portal. Thank you. // Laughing Man 01:49, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject France

[edit]

Hello! We are a group of editors working to improve the quality of France related articles. You look like someone who might be interested in joining us in the France WikiProject and so I thought I'd drop you a line and invite you! We'd love to have you in our project :-) STTW (talk) 22:00, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Diriyahpic.jpg

[edit]

Hi!

Could you upload the picture to Wikimedia commons? As I would like to use it for the german article on Diriyah at de:Diraja. Thanks --T.woelk 15:16, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject France

[edit]
Welcome Petrovic-Njegos, to the WikiProject France! Please direct any questions about the project to its talk page. If you create new articles on France-related topics, please list them at our announcement page and tag their talk page with our project template {{WikiProject France}}.

A few features that you might find helpful:

  • The project's Navigation box points to most of the pages in the project that might be of use to you.
  • Most of the important discussions related to the project take place on the project's main talk page; you may find it useful to watchlist it.
  • We've developed a number of guidelines for names, titles, and other things to standardize our articles and make interlinking easier that you may find useful.
Wikipedia:France-related tasks
view • edit • discuss • history • watch

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me or any of the more experienced members of the project, and we'll be very happy to help you. Again, welcome, and thank you for joining this project!

STTW (talk) 23:33, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

French elections

[edit]

Just wanted to say excellent work doing all the French election articles - not a redlink left! If you want some more stuff to do, you can link them to the French language articles as I've done with French constitutional referendum, 1958 :) Number 57 12:05, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Logoump.png

[edit]

Thank you for uploading Image:Logoump.png. I provided an image description and a fair use rationale. I noticed the resolution of the image is much higher than necessary, and the image should have a low resolution, according to WP:NFCC #3(b). Maybe you could reduce the resolution by half? – Ilse@ 10:07, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Debate on the correct adjective for Kosovo

[edit]

Hi! Based on your interest in the Balkans, you may be interested in the currently ongoing debate on whether we should be using Kosovo or Kosovar/Kosovan as the adjective for Kosovo. —Nightstallion 15:31, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Referendum results

[edit]

Regarding Maldivian constitutional referendum, 2007: you added a results table along with a "source" that does not confirm the numbers you added. Where did you get those numbers from? If they are accurate, please add your actual source. Everyking 05:17, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From the source newsvine, which was in the source too. If they're not accurate then...--Petrovic-Njegos 13:22, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The numbers are not there. It just gives rough figures, 60%-38%. Everyking 19:41, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It had numbers yesterday. --Petrovic-Njegos 20:59, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ottawa-West Nepean provincial ED

[edit]

Hi. The tag was put on to try to avoid having a CSD tag placed on it. CSD tags can go up less than a minute after a new page goes up. Since the article shows some election stats, a quick source from the organization in charge of running Ontario elections could easily have been added. Adding relevant categories is also something that can be done at the outset. This was an effort to help the article rather than hurt it. Hope you understand. --- Taroaldo 22:06, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Archive

[edit]

Petrovic-Njegos, check out Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.
Cheers. --PaxEquilibrium 22:59, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Newsletter n°1

[edit]

Bonjour and welcome to the first WikiProject France newsletter!! It should become a monthly special of our project, but until the next issue, here are some points to consider for the month:

It doesn't seem like a lot, so I hope we will still have enough problems for nexts months issue. Salut till the next issue, ChrisDHDR (17:19, 10 November 2007 (UTC)).[reply]

re: french party mp

[edit]

I put up the template because to be honest the name sounded a bit like what a vandaliser would do (create random articles) and the only text was : F##342.

I look forward to hear what you have to say

thanks,

Cf38 (talk) 14:32, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

re: its a template

[edit]

Ohhhh shit. Sorry, I did'nt notice.

Cf38 (talk) 14:34, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: French legislative constituencies

[edit]

I do think that it a great idea to make the articles, however, they change from year to year, so maybe it would be better to organise them in groups according to their départements (this would also be handy for creating a Navigation template). If you don't know, sufficient information can be found at fr:Circonscriptions électorales (France). If you kneed any help just give me a shot. ChrisDHDR 15:27, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Name

[edit]

Hi, why did you choose this name in specific? :) Cheers. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 15:37, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah! You're interested in Montenegro? Which'd be your choice then, since you're interested in politics - if it's not a secret? --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 15:38, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I thought which party you (could) favor, if any (if not secret). --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 09:58, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't bare myself do support DPS CG really, because they are not quite democratic and do not have clean hands, especially if we view their past (they're led by formerly Serbian nationalist people with potential criminal records). Also a party whose leader has been marked as the mafia boss of a major international criminal organization smuggling weapons, drugs (and cigarettes) as well as sex-slave trade...I'll wait the actual trial, but I think it's obvious.
The LPCG are OK enough, but my personal favorite'd be the PZP. They're the only ones with the capacity to unite Montenegro.
Sure why not? Shoot. ;) --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 17:59, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:UDFlogo2.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:UDFlogo2.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mrp.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Mrp.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:11, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why is Betacommandbot picking on you?

[edit]

Answer is he's not. Both of those images, at the time that BCbot tagged them, did not specify precisely which article each provided fair use rationale was valid for. For example, Image:Mrp.png, at the time it was tagged by BCbot, you specified it was for use in the MRP article. Firstly this is not the article which the image is used in, secondly MRP is a disambiguation page. It appears that Melesse (talk · contribs) has swept these two up nicely by the way so no more action is required on your behalf. Hope that makes sense. The Rambling Man 14:03, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Logoudb.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Logoudb.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:13, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Newsletter n°2

[edit]

It's been one high aiming month! The French WikiProject and related pages have been aiming high for Christmas - and have received an equal number of presents in return!

Well, that's this issue. Au revoir et à bientôt till the next time, ChrisDHDR (18:54, 9 December 2007 (UTC)).[reply]

Vincent-Marie Viénot de Vaublanc

[edit]

Bonjour Petrovic. J'ai vu sur ta page personnelle que tu es bilingue anglais et français et que tu appartiens au Wikiproject France. Je souhaiterais faire de cet article un featured article à terme sur la wikipédia anglophone malheureusement je ne suis pas parfaitement bilingue en anglais. Il y aurait notamment une relecture à faire et une correction à faire en fonction des recommandations du peer review suivant Talk:Vincent-Marie Viénot, comte de Vaublanc . Es-tu intéressé?, j'attends ta réponse, merci d'avance. Aymeric78 (talk) 00:12, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour ton aide. Il s'agit comme je te l'ai dit plus haut d'effectuer une relecture et une correction du style pour que la rédaction de l'article soit plus favorable aux exigences émises sur la page suivante:Talk:Vincent-Marie Viénot, comte de Vaublanc. Aymeric78 (talk) 01:13, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:FranceCantonale04.png. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:FranceCanto04.png. The copy called Image:FranceCanto04.png has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 16:44, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:FranceCantonale04.png. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:48, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Belgian federal elections, 2007

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Belgian federal elections, 2007 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 01:43, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Belgian federal elections, 2007 senate

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Belgian federal elections, 2007 senate requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 01:43, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

French communes

[edit]

Wikipedia:WikiProject French communes:

I would like to welcome you back to the project. With some help from User:AlbertHerring, User:Blofeld of SPECTRE, and User:Jj137, I have successfully revived the project. Welcome back, we hope to see you there, Basketball110 what famous people say ♣ 17:10, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Constituency (France)

[edit]

Hello,

I notice that you began to create articles about the French legislative constituencies. For my part, I developped on fr:WP many articles about the constituencies in western France (see fr:Première circonscription de la Loire-Atlantique, for example). Maybe could we cooperate to adapt these articles here.

Regards, Pymouss44 Causer 11:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject French Communes Newsletter

[edit]
File:Logo de la République française.svg
The French Communes WikiProject Newsletter
Volume 1, Issue 2 • April 5, 2008 • About the Project • Written by: Basketball110 and Editorofthewiki
News

Project and team news:

Features

Featured French commune articles of the week:

Collaboration of the Month
  • The push for cantons has begun! See Canton of Champagne-en-Valromey for an example of what the canton articles are to look like. We want to get articles on all of them by the end of the month.
Archives • Newsroom

If you would not like to receive this newsletter, please add your name here.


Delivered by: Basketball110  Talk 

Re:2008 Democratic results by county

[edit]

Somebody else filled that in, I'm pretty sure it's User:Xiibaro. Hopefully that helps, good luck in your search for the information! HoosierStateTalk 14:17, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cap21.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:54, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cielo Estrellado...

[edit]

...is changing hundreds of templates about elections (see here). Can we stop him in some way? --Checco (talk) 15:30, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We should do it. If you contact an administrator, tell me. I already contacted Nightstallion but he is not very interested in the issue. --Checco (talk) 12:47, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
PCF not far left? I understand your concers, but I observe that in the template history you are the onlyone supporting the idea that PCF is not far left... --Checco (talk) 06:51, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Also LCR and LO will be parliamentary parties if they would and I sincerely disagree with your arguments, but, anyway, the template is not the kind of thing I'm personally so interested in. --Checco (talk) 11:01, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
My point is that we'd better replace "far left" with "extra-parliamentary left", but I understand that the current solution is simpler. Take care. --Checco (talk) 11:04, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

French regional elections, 2004

[edit]

Your work on French regional elections, 2004 is simply fantastic. Keep working like this! --Checco (talk) 17:46, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

French legislative constituencies

[edit]

Thanks for helping out on the Ille-et-Vilaine constituencies. I really appreciate it, it's a great help.

I also like your idea of just runoff results too- much easier and simpler. Better style ;). I'll probably do that from now. Also, thanks for using the templates and so forth. It's great that you do that!

I hope you can continue creating some pages for the elections!

But may I ask your sources for results? I've only been able to go back to 1988 using the internets for data!

Thanks.

[Si ca ne te derange pas non plus, on peut parler en francais. Au fait, aurais-tu une adresse email/MSN/AIM? J'aimerais bien discuter politique et Bretagne avec toi :)

Merci

--Petrovic-Njegos (talk) 15:00, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello
As we are in an english-speaking project, I think it's nicer to write in English.
The source of the data for the figures before 1993 is the personnal website of Jean-Michel Boucheron, (http://www.jmboucheron.fr/scrutins/scrutins.htm). He had the good idea to copy all the results of the polls he took part in. Unfortunately, I think he's the only one to do it...
À bientôt, Pymouss44 Causer 17:26, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

French liberal parties

[edit]

Dear Petrovic-Njegos, there is an article which definitely needs your work, if you have time and will: liberalism and radicalism in France. As I saw in many articles about French elections, there are more "liberal" parties which should be cited in that article. Can you work on it a little bit? --Checco (talk) 10:54, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One more question. In French legislative election, 2007 can we have the separate figures of LO and LCR? --Checco (talk) 11:06, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the information. --Checco (talk) 14:06, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have the figure for MRC of Chevenement or not? --Checco (talk) 13:14, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strange, thanks anyway. --Checco (talk) 15:16, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:CanElect20

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:CanElect20 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:01, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MPs and MEPs

[edit]

Can you fix the numbers of MPs and MEPs in the infobox of Radical Party (France)? I wanted to correct the numbers (6 senators instead of 7, 3 MEPs instead of 2), but I did some mistake... --Checco (talk) 20:47, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also would like you to see if this edit by an IP is correct. Thanks, --Checco (talk) 12:29, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Same for these edits. --Checco (talk) 06:36, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Lo.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:03, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Nouveaucentre.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 07:25, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

[edit]

Hello. Regarding the last two comments you left in my talk page, please take a look at this page: WP:NPA. Thanks. ☆ CieloEstrellado 01:06, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What should we do with this guy? I'm certain that other users disagree with him changing templates... --Checco (talk) 11:03, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I talked with User:Nightstallion on the issue but I don't remember if he was worried by CieloEstrellado's edits or not. Today I wrote my opinion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Elections and Referenda: maybe that's a good place where to discuss. --Checco (talk) 11:14, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Let's put in our watchlist that talk and think what admin we could contact. If you know any user who is annoyed or can be annoyed by CieloEstrellado's edits, let him know about the issue and the talk. --Checco (talk) 07:55, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject France newsletter

[edit]
WikiProject France News

What's new?

[edit]
  • The project has recently experienced a complete redesign. The Outreach department has also undergone a major expansion, and this newsletter is the result of that.
  • The review department is currently under development, with several new proposals underway. Internal peer review had begun on the page of the project's Review Department. The department currently provides a centralized platform off all currently open reviews throughout the project (Featured Articles, Peer Reviews, Good Articles, Articles for Deletion, Categories for Discussion, etc.)
  • A new task force has been introduced: the Paris task force. Any users interested in contributing to the taskforce can join on the project page.
  • There is a current discussion about merging the French Communes WikiProject into ours. This communes project will be organised as a task force.
User-related news

Notifications

[edit]
Complete project tasks
Overview

This is the new project newsletter, covering months August through to October, which will contain information regarding new Good and Featured articles, recent project changes, general related news, and recent proposals.

If you've just joined, add your name to the Members section of Wikipedia:WikiProject France. You'll get a mention in the next issue of the Newsletter and get it delivered as desired. Also, please include your own promotions and awards in future issues. Don't be shy!

Lastly, this is your newsletter and you can be involved in the creation of the creation. Any and all contributions are welcome. Simply let yourself be known to any of the undersigned, or just start editing!

Articles
  • Five articles are currently undergoing external peer reviews:
  1. Louvre Abu Dhabi
  2. Louvre
  3. Family Moving Day
  4. Napoleon I
  5. List of Bellflower Bunny Episodes
  • Two articles have reached GA status this month:
Newsletter contributors

Thank you for your contributions to the project, Jordan Contribs 18:59, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Something that may interest you...

[edit]

User:SFGiants/Next French legislative election

I'd love to see you make something of it, if at all possible. ¿SFGiДnts! ¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review! 21:22, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. It's all yours. You can move it to your userspace if you'd like. ¿SFGiДnts! ¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review! 21:57, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

UMP

[edit]

Can you fix the infobox in Union for a Popular Movement? --Checco (talk) 09:40, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


npa

[edit]

Hi I added some info to New anticapitalist party , if you want to have a look. cheers Johncmullen1960 (talk) 07:55, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Axis History

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Axis History requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Schuym1 (talk) 21:52, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

French regional politics

[edit]

Hi my friend, you are always doing a great job about French politics, and especially with constituencies and regional councils: my sincere congratulations. It would be great if you do something like what I did for Politics of Italian regions (see the links) and Elections in Italian regions. We definitely need a comprehensive database about French regions and regional elections. --Checco (talk) 23:34, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I know, also from my experience, that it's an infinite job, especially because both you and me are working all alone, but I definitely appreciate what your doing and I think that you ar one of the best editors of en.Wiki. Anyway remember that in Wikipedia there is no deadline!
I will start an article about the forthcoming Sardinian regional election only when it has occurred. There are two main candidates, Renato Soru for the left and Ugo Cappellacci for the right, plus some regionalist and independentist candidates. Cappellacci was able to form a broad coalition including some important regionalist parties, notably the Sardinian Reformers, a centrist outfit, and the Sardinian Action Party, an historical left-wing party. That was possible because Cappellacci roots are on the left. Anyway I don't know what will be the more likely outcome as there has been only a couple of opinion polls and in Italy surveys are forbidden in the last 15 days before the election. Both Soru and Cappellacci are popular, and Italian voters tend to vote differently in general and regional/local elections. Moreover in Sardinia there are several regionalist parties which could hold the balance. I guess that Cappellacci is a little bit advantaged, but I'm not sure of it! --Checco (talk) 08:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I worked a little bit on categories related to politics and elections of French regions. I think you could easily follow the pattern I followed with categories, if you agree with it. I also noticed that there is both Category:Politics of Bretagne and Category:Politics of Brittany. You should probably either merge the two categories or re-order the articles included in them. For instance, Bretagne Regional Council is categorized under the Category:Politics of Brittany... Moreover several other articles are not categorized properly: see for instance Alsace Regional Council. Before doing a large amount of work, I advise you to categorize already existent articles in the proper categories. It's better to do it now than later, when there will be many more new articles! Keep up the admirable job your doing! --Checco (talk) 09:35, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Italian geo-politics

[edit]

I am too personally fascinated by electoral geography and related issues, but I'm not exactly an expert of it about Italy as I am of the United States (for instance), even if I read some specific books on the issue. Anyway I will do my best to answer to your questions. Italian voting patterns are a mix of class divide, clerical/anticlerical divide, historical traditions and "ethnic" divisions.

Central Italy (excluding Lazio, the region around Rome) has always been the most left-wing area of the country. This was a result of centuries of "Vatican domination" (remember that large areas of Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, Umbria, Marche and Lazio were long part of the Church State). Since the 1840s Central Italy was the cradle of the progressive and secular-minded Democrats, the heirs of Mazzini, and later socialist and anarchist movements settled in these regions more than in every other part of Italy. Finally, during World War II, Emilia-Romagna and Tuscany were the places where the civil war tougher and the Italian Resistance had strong roots there. There were the basic reasons why the Italian Socialist Party and later the Italian Communist Party were strong there. This does not mean that Tuscanians or Emilians are poor or progressive: as you observed Tuscany and Emilia-Romagna are rich regions and they are not necessarily progressive. Many people in Central Italy are or have been supporters of the left because of tradition and this did not stop them to be conservative or traditionalist on many issues. In fact Emilia-Romagna and Tuscany are a strange stronghold for a communist party as they were basically rural areas. The left-wing tradition is very strong also today there, but something is changing: especially the Emilian party machine is composed of traditional voters who are interested in facts more than theory, but this is not more enough as many voters are turning to the centre-right and to Lega Nord, which is perceived as a political force strongly linked to the territories like the old Communist Party.

Italian voting patterns, like those of the United States, have long been strongly linked to tradition. After World War II, while the Communist Party was strong in Central Italy, Christian Democracy had its strongholds in Lombardy and Veneto. The Socialists were strong in some areas of Veneto, Lombardy and Piedmont. In the conservative South the heirs of the old guard (both Fascist and pre-Fascist) were better positioned. In the years Christian Democrats and Socialists moved south, losing votes in the North and gaining support in the South, where they easily became patronage parties. This changed their nature and their base. In particular Christian Democracy was a catch-all party including almost everything. At the beginning of the 1990s they were contemporaneously at their heyday in the South and in a difficult crisis in the North. Also the Communists were in difficult times. Lega Nord gained votes in the North both from Christian Democracy and the Communists.

The South has always been basically conservative and that was why the Communists were never strong there. The North, and especially the North-East, is home to another kind of conservatism: a mix of progressive Catholicism, libertarianism and regionalism. The PdL is strong both in the South and in the North-East, but I'm sure that that alliance won't last when Berlusconi will eventually quit politics. Remember also that the North-East is also the place where Lega Nord and other regionalist movements are stronger. The electoral base of the current Democratic Party is also an awkward alliance between the historical Communist tradition strong of Emilia-Romagna and Tuscany, the workers' tradition of Turin and Milan suburbs, progressive Catholics, socially liberal progressives and conservatives from the South. In large areas of the South the Democratic Party is strong because of the connection between former Communists and "left-wing DC voters" (as you called them), but remember that both groups can be actually conservative. Something similar has happened in Trentino, which is not a Souther region off course!

Rome, as most urban areas in the world, tends to be left-wing, but it is also a stronghold of the heirs of Fascism, who have popular roots in some neighbourhoods of the city and in the rural provinces of Lazio. The historical reason for this is that Fascism was a very good thing for many people in Rome and Lazio. Mussolini exalted the tradition of ancient Rome and made strong efforts in order to modernize Rome and Lazio. After 1992-1994 many conservative Christian Democrats joined National Alliance, which was the largest and most attractive party of the area. Under a plurality voting system Italy would have been divided in four large areas: the North (Forza Italia and Lega Nord), the "red regions" (Democratic Party of the Left), Lazio and parts of the South (National Alliance and former Christian Democrats), deep South (Forza Italia and Christian Democrats).

In general, let me tell you that Italian politics is more easily understandable by using American standards: we elect directly almost everything and, in some way, also the prime minister (even if the electoral law includes the heads of coalitions), we'll use more and more primaries to select candidates, politics is very regionalized, and our two big parties and Lega Nord, their organization, their ideas and their rethorics are often easily comaparable with United States parties. PdL, PD and LN are big parties all including both conservatives and progressives in their ranks, and generally a Liberal politician from the North agrees on more issues with a Northern Democrat than with a Southern Liberal. What is happening is a sort of regionalization of Italian politics, along with what many pundits call "Americanization".

I don't know anything about significant mining areas in Italy.

Sorry for my bad English, for being too long and not exhaustive as well. If there's anything I did not answer or you have more questions for me, just tell me! --Checco (talk) 23:03, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do have questions about Frenche electoral geography. I'm particularily interested how the clerical/anticlerical divide has divided some regions from others. What were the strongholds the Republicans (ARD, CNIP, RI, PR), the Christian Democrats (MRP, CD, CDS), the Radicals (Rad., RGR), the Socialists (SFIO, PS) and the Communists (PCF) and why? What was the basic difference beteen Republicans and Radicals as they were both secular-minded? How did the Gaullists position themselves in that five-party system? To what strongholds of the Republicans, the Christian Democratas and the Radicals do the UMP and the MoDem correspond? Thanks. --Checco (talk) 08:22, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ps: You're lucky that I know well Canadian politics, if not I would ask you also of Canadian electoral geography!
Thank you so much for your detailed answer and for the link to your website: it will definitely help me to find answers also to other questions. I found particularily interesting that in France SFIO was the rural party if compared to the PCF, while in Italy it was the PCI to have a strong rural base. I would like to ask you however something more:
  • what were the areas of major support for the ARD and, later, the CNIP?
  • why was southwestern France the Radical's stronghold?
  • how can Bayrou do so well in Catholic areas, including Vandeé when he is so socially liberal?
I hope that you will upload in your website the maps of the 1950s legislative elections for the CNIP and and the Radicals and that of the 1989 European Parliament election, when the PR formed a separate list from CDS/UDF led by Simone Veil. That would be verty interesting and helpful to answer to my questions. --Checco (talk) 11:40, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ps: I noticed that most French regionalist parties have articles with French titles. Why that exception to the general pattern? What do you think about it? Can you move those articles? In case you can ask help to Nightstallion, who (I'm sure) he is in favour of English titles when possibile. --Checco (talk) 11:40, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your answers and useful remarks: now I'm completely satisfied! As much as you I am very interested to see what the outcome of 2009 European election in France will be. Surely secular Veil headed the CDS list in 1989? Interesting... it would be great if you will upload maps by party for that election. Tell me if you do large updates to your website. --Checco (talk) 23:45, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July Monarchy elections

[edit]

I'm wondering on what basis you determined that the opposition in the July monarchy was a "Republican Opposition". This simply isn't true - most of the opposition were Orleanists, and there were about as many legitimists as there were Republicans - I don't think there were ever more than about 20 Republicans in the Chamber under the July Monarchy. Obviously, party distinctions in France in the 19th century are always a bit vague, but this is basically just wrong - opposing Guizot's government does not make one a republican. john k (talk) 16:32, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough - I just thought I'd let you know, since you created the articles. john k (talk) 17:29, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

EU elections

[edit]

The electoral law for European Parliament elections was reformed in February: a 4% threshold representing was introduced, for the rest nothing has changed and the system is very similar to the French one, even if the constituencies are fare bigger (that's the biggest problem with it, in my view). Voters can choose a party list and a maximum of three candidates from that list. The only exception to the 4% rule is for the parties representing linguisting minorities recognized by the Constitution: in practice, South Tyrolean and Valdotanian parties can be apparenteé (correct?) to bigger parties and actively concur to the election of one MEP (if one of their candidates gets a good deal of preference votes.

It will be great if you send me the maps as a previw (I will send you an empty e-mail from Wikipedia), but I have no problem in waiting until you publish them in your website too. Just feel free to do what you prefer. Thanks, anyway, and, please, ask me if there is something more you don't understan (or I did not explain clearly) about European Parliament elections in Italy. --Checco (talk) 20:39, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:LMD-NClogo.gif

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:LMD-NClogo.gif. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Élie Hoarau

[edit]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Élie Hoarau. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 06:33, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Madeleine de Grandmaison

[edit]

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Madeleine de Grandmaison. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 06:33, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from European Parliament election, 1994 (France). When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 21:41, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization of headings

[edit]

Petrovic-Njegos, thank you for all of your contributions to Wikipeida, especially on political subjects. I would like to draw one point to your attention.

The Wikipedia style for capitalizing headings is to use "sentence case" instead of "title case", e.g.,

Important things to know about this subject

not:

Important Things to Know About This Subject

This may be unfamiliar to many editors who believe that or have been taught that "title case is the right way to capitalize headings". It isn't the "right way", it is one style. Wikipedia has, for better or worse, chosen to follow a different style, i.e., capitalize the heading the same way you would capitalize any sentence:

  • capitalize the first word,
  • capitalize any proper nouns (people, places, organizations), and
  • begin all other words with lower case letters.

See WP:MSH for more information. Thank you. Regards, Ground Zero | t 22:40, 4 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Logo-parti communiste français-2005.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo-parti communiste français-2005.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:59, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An exciting opportunity to get involved!

[edit]

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 03:44, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ligue savoisienne

[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Ligue savoisienne. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ligue savoisienne. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Place Ville-Marie

[edit]

Hi there,

I see on your user page that you live in Montreal. I am going to assume that you have heard of Place Ville-Marie in asking you this question. The reports of the number of floors in Place Ville-Marie vary from 43 to 46. Do you, with your Montreal expertise, know the actual number of floors in this structure, or could you possibly visit this building to find out? Thanks,

-Stuck in Edmonton 117Avenue (talk) 22:51, 28 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject Elections and Referenda!

[edit]

Welcome, Petrovic-Njegos, to WikiProject Elections and Referenda! Thank you for joining this fledgling project. Please participate in the discussions on the talk page and check the to-do list from time to time. If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask me. @harej 02:03, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

After considerable planning, {{election}} has been created. Please take a look at it and leave feedback on the WikiProject talk page. @harej 02:45, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Petrovic-Njegos! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 30 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 139 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Jean Saint-Josse - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Jean-Yves Le Drian - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Jonathan Valois - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Antoine Waechter - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Camille de Rocca Serra - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  6. Michel Vauzelle - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  7. Jean-Michel Baylet - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  8. Émile Zuccarelli - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  9. Jean-Claude Sebag - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  10. Gérard Collomb - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:12, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:France-parti-socialiste.svg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:France-parti-socialiste.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 02:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited!

[edit]

Hello, Petrovic-Njegos,

You are invited meet with your fellow Wikipedians by attending the Montréal meetup scheduled on Sunday, June 27, 2010; between 1500 - 1700 to be held at the Comité Social Centre Sud (CSCS), located at 1710 Beaudry, in Montréal. You can sign up at the meetup page.

The meetup is happening in concurrence with RoCoCo 2010, a free, bilingual, weekend unconference including many people involved with Wikis both within the Wikipedia/Wikimedia Community and abroad. You do not need to attend the conference to sign up for the Wikimeetup, but you are certainly welcome! Bastique ☎ call me!

(PS: Please share this with those you know who might not be on the delivery list, i.e. Users in Montreal/Quebec) 

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) 00:48, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

[edit]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 23:32, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Véronique Goncalvès

[edit]

The article Véronique Goncalvès has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:11, 19 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scheduled deletion of Christophe Beaudouin

[edit]

This article, an unreferenced BLP, is due to be deleted under WP:BLPPROD unless one or more references are provided. Please visit the article page for further details. Hohenloh + 17:24, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Erika Kuttner-Perreau

[edit]

The article Erika Kuttner-Perreau has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a non-notable and unreferenced biography of a French politician.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stormbay (talk) 18:21, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gérard Boulanger for deletion

[edit]

The article Gérard Boulanger is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gérard Boulanger until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shirt58 (talk) 14:02, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jean-Claude Sebag

[edit]

The article Jean-Claude Sebag has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:POLITICIAN. A fringe candidate for French president, he won 0.16% of the vote and finished second last in a field of twelve.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pburka (talk) 14:09, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logoump.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logoump.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 04:09, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:France-parti-socialiste.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:France-parti-socialiste.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 05:59, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jean-Philippe Magnen

[edit]

I have just proposed the article for deletion, as I believe it fails to meet notability for politicians.

Regards. --Azurfrog (talk) 16:19, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:European Parliament election, 2004 (France West)

[edit]

Template:European Parliament election, 2004 (France West) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:19, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:CanElect20

[edit]

Template:CanElect20 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Bulwersator (talk) 17:16, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

[edit]

Hi, and thanks for your contributions. Please remember that on en.WP we don't normally link years, dates, or common terms. Cheers, and please ask me on my talk page if you have any questions about editing. Tony (talk) 13:55, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Leadership of UMP

[edit]

Hello PN, could you update the "leadership" section in th article on the UMP? Thank you in advance!

Aggressive deletionism

[edit]

I used to contribute more to wikipedia (2005 to 2010). Recently, it is apparent that quite worthy articles are targets of deletions. For example, this article which I would think would interest you, given your contributions: Les Alternatifs

Here is the French article for the topic: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Les_Alternatifs

This seems like certain persons are taking it to themselves to nullify the valid work that people have contributed. The speedy deletion method seems to pre-empt any discussion of the matter, in contrast to past conventions on such matters. Meanwhile, juvenile or fan-oriented articles, promoting pet performers seem to proliferate in wikipedia. To whom can we appeal?Dogru144 (talk) 14:16, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Logoudb.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logoudb.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:02, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michel Guiniot

[edit]

The article Michel Guiniot has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

DOesn't meet WP:POLITICIAN or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 20:23, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Delanoistes for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Delanoistes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delanoistes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Liam987(talk) 16:30, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back!

[edit]

Hello Petrovic-Njegs, I saw your 6 Septermber edit, after more than two years of absence from en.Wikipedia. Welcome back! We still need you and your expertise, especially with French political parties, thus don't go away for long again. Welcome back! --Checco (talk) 13:02, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I don't know how active I'll be but I felt like making a few edits, but I think I'll mostly be focusing on Colombian politics, parties and elections (since I'm living in Colombia for a while) for some time but I can always lend a hand for French stuff. Best! --Petrovic-Njegos (talk) 18:53, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Petrovic-Njegos: I'm a native English speaker living in Bogotá and keen to improve Colombia articles on Wikipedia - if I can help at all on Colombian politics I would be happy to do so. WikiProject Colombia urgently needs kickstarting again - see the recent discussion on the project's talk page. Richard3120 (talk) 02:47, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Petrovic-Njegos: Do what you want, as much as you want, but please stay! --Checco (talk) 07:45, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

[edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eddie Puyjalon

[edit]

The article Eddie Puyjalon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NPOLITICIAN and WP:GNG. Merely a candidate, has not been elected to office.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safiel (talk) 18:10, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Colombian Constitution of 1991, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page M-19. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OrphanReferenceFixer: Help on reversion

[edit]

Hi there! I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. Recently, you reverted my fix to Colombian Constitution of 1991.

If you did this because the references should be removed from the article, you have misunderstood the situation. Most likely, the article originally contained both <ref name="foo">...</ref> and one or more <ref name="foo"/> referring to it. Someone then removed the <ref name="foo">...</ref> but left the <ref name="foo"/>, which results in a big red error in the article. I replaced one of the remaining <ref name="foo"/> with a copy of the <ref name="foo">...</ref>; I did not re-insert the reference to where it was deleted, I just replaced one of the remaining instances. What you need to do to fix it is to make sure you remove all instances of the named reference so as to not leave any big red error.

If you reverted because I made an actual mistake, please be sure to also correct any reference errors in the page so I won't come back and make the same mistake again. Also, please post an error report at User talk:AnomieBOT so my operator can fix me! If the error is so urgent that I need to be stopped, also post a message at User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/OrphanReferenceFixer. Thanks! AnomieBOT⚡ 17:41, 26 December 2015 (UTC) If you do not wish to receive this message in the future, add {{bots|optout=AnomieBOT-OrphanReferenceFixer}} to your talk page.[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Colombian Constitution of 1991, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electoral quota. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Colombian Constitution of 1991, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Servitude and Hermann Heller. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This text [1]

was word for word from https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Colombia_2013 which at the top says it is copyrighted by Oxford University Press.

Not sure if there are other issues in that article? Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:54, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would be good if you respond here Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 14:44, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Federico Gutiérrez, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colombian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:LutteOuvriereLogo.jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:LutteOuvriereLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Colombian peace process, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Peace process, La Macarena and Gini. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Referendum/plebiscite

[edit]

There is no consensus on what the difference is between a referendum and a plebiscite (different countries use those terms in different ways). Referendum is the term the Wiki article is under, so that is the one used in electoral calendars. The fact that there is a difference between the two in a non-English speaking country like Colombia is rather irrelevant to the terminology in an article on English Wiki. Please do not start an edit war over the Colombian plebiscite, but just accept referendum is the term in common use.--Batmacumba (talk) 18:34, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's absolutely ridiculous - once again, Wikipedia's arbitrary rules lead to inaccuracy. The legal distinction between referendum and plebiscite is real and significant in Colombia, and as such I think that if we want to have quality and accurate content about Colombian politics, the correct legal term used in Colombia should be used to describe a Colombian event. Especially as it may lead to confusion with actual Colombian referendums, like that of 2003. As is the case for other similar events which were plebiscites under local laws - Chilean national plebiscite, 1988; Carinthian plebiscite, 1920; Australian plebiscite, 1916 (vs. Australian republic referendum, 1999). If Australian plebiscites are called plebiscites and Australian referendums are called referendums, as they should, explain why Colombia would be any different. Now, if Wikipedia cares more about arbitrary rules rather than factual accuracy, my work here is pointless.--Petrovic-Njegos (talk) 22:58, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite

[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 00:48, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Swiss politics/party colours/SVP

[edit]

Template:Swiss politics/party colours/SVP has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 19:54, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Petrovic-Njegos. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gaucheunitaire.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gaucheunitaire.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rally-UMPlogo.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rally-UMPlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RPC-NClogo.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RPC-NClogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:01, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rpflogo.gif

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rpflogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:02, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MPFlogo.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MPFlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nouveaucentre.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nouveaucentre.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sophie Auconie

[edit]

The article Sophie Auconie has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Atlantic306 (talk) 20:47, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Petrovic-Njegos. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Liechtenstein parliamentary election, 2009

[edit]

Template:Liechtenstein parliamentary election, 2009 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 14:05, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Génération Écologie (logo).jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Génération Écologie (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:16, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:L'Avenir Ensemble (logo).jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:L'Avenir Ensemble (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:43, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mouvement Ecologiste Indépendant (logo).jpg

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mouvement Ecologiste Indépendant (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:20, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mouvement de la diversité (logo).gif

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mouvement de la diversité (logo).gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:34, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Portal:Austria-Hungary

[edit]

Are you still maintaining the Portal:Austria-Hungary? If so please put you user name into the portal maintenance template as a maintainer. Cheers, · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 09:11, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rally-UMPlogo.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rally-UMPlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year

[edit]
Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Petrovic-Njegos, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019.
Happy editing,
Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 06:21, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

An invitation to discussion

[edit]

I kindly invited you to the discussion on Template talk:Infobox election#The Bolding issue to decide whether to bold the winner in the election infobox. Lmmnhn (talk) 19:05, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion - List of Serbs?

[edit]

I would like to hear your opinion on this matter - https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:List_of_Serbians

Thank you.

Mm.srb (talk) 04:28, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:European Parliament election, 2009 (France)

[edit]

Template:European Parliament election, 2009 (France) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Steel1943 (talk) 17:34, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Gauteng provincial election, 2004

[edit]

Template:Gauteng provincial election, 2004 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 22:56, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:French politics

[edit]

Portal:French politics, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:French politics and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:French politics during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:23, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Portal:Austria-Hungary

[edit]

Portal:Austria-Hungary, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Austria-Hungary and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Austria-Hungary during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 15:10, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bruno Subtil for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bruno Subtil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruno Subtil until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NAH 13:23, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jean-Marc de Lacoste-Lareymondie for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jean-Marc de Lacoste-Lareymondie is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean-Marc de Lacoste-Lareymondie until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NAH 13:28, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Valérie Dupont for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Valérie Dupont is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Valérie Dupont until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NAH 13:34, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Éric Faurot for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Éric Faurot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Éric Faurot until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NAH 13:36, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Thierry Gourlot for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thierry Gourlot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thierry Gourlot until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NAH 13:38, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nicole Gauthier for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicole Gauthier is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicole Gauthier until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NAH 13:39, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gaston Franco

[edit]
Notice

The article Gaston Franco has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:02, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Spanish general election, 1936

[edit]

Template:Spanish general election, 1936 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:34, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Ontario general election, 2007

[edit]

Template:Ontario general election, 2007 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:18, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rpflogo1.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rpflogo1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:German politics/party colours/NPD

[edit]

Template:German politics/party colours/NPD has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:29, 19 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Presidents of Alsace

[edit]

Template:Presidents of Alsace has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Excellenc1 (talk) 16:28, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CNIPlogo.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CNIPlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rpflogo.gif

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rpflogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:56, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Royalists (French Socialist Party) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Royalists (French Socialist Party) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royalists (French Socialist Party) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 21:14, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of New Socialist Party (France) for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article New Socialist Party (France) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Socialist Party (France) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 21:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aubryists for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aubryists is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aubryists until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 21:19, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Petrovic-Njegos&oldid=1256845746"