User talk:Pethmakhama

September 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Pethmakhama Magam Budgam. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:46, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pethmakhama Magam Budgam, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:26, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 13:22, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move pages in order to create a new one as you did with Talk:Pethmakhama, Budgam to create Baba Reshi (RA). It has been reverted. See this page on how to create a page. — JJMC89 (T·C) 23:34, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Baba Payam ud Din Reshi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Baba Payam ud Din Reshi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baba Payam ud Din Reshi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 14:06, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:The holy Relic Asar Sharief Pethmakhama.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:The holy Relic Asar Sharief Pethmakhama.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:38, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:JJMC89..thank you for the information. yes i uploade the file. i have specified it now. thank you for the information.Pethmakhama 05:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits on Pethmakhama, Budgam

Hello again. Please stop adding excessive details to the article. It's an article about a small ordinary village, one of tens of thousands of similar in the Indian sub-continent, not a major city, and Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not an indiscriminate collection of information. Which means that having sources isn't reason enough for inclusion, all material added must also be encyclopaedic, and be proportionate to the importance of the subject of the article. Thank you. Thomas.W ^talk 12:23, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response Thomas.W. But all the information is true and impeccable, informative according to Wikipedia guidelines. So why delete the content for what makes the Village special among other villages. If the village has an importance then it should be there well placed, not to be deleted at all.Pethmakhama 12:30, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IP socking

It has been found that you have been using one or more accounts abusively or have edited logged out to avoid scrutiny. Please review the policy on acceptable alternate accounts. In short, alternate accounts or people to support you should not be used for the purposes of deceiving others into seeing more support for your position. It is not acceptable to use two accounts on the same article, or the same topic area, unless they are publically and plainly disclosed on both your and the other account's userpage.

Your other account(s) have been blocked indefinitely. This is your only warning. If you repeat this behaviour you will blocked from editing without further notice. Thank you. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:26, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 00:41, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]