User talk:Peter OKH

Nomination of Lil5ive for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lil5ive is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lil5ive until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 18:41, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article is a good one and i don’t think it should be deleted. Lil5ive is actually known by a lot of music fans In the Nigerian music industry. His latest single Omo Ologo has been heavily rotated on radio, it has placed him in a smooth aura. You can check his numbers on steaming plaforms too. He has over 400,000 accumulated streams on digital stores, over 300K on audiomack. As a new artist who lives in Nigeria, that is a huge milestone. We should learn to support new breakout acts and Wikipedia is one of the means where more fans would get to see his complete info. Thanks Oyasoyas (talk) 19:16, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Peter OKH, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Celestina007 (talk) 19:57, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of sockpuppetry block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Peter OKH. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 01:26, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]