User talk:Peter B.

Hello Peter. I have tagged Image:UgandaWaragi.jpg as {{GFDL-self}}. Images must be have copyright information or they will be deleted. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for more information. --Ezeu 07:56, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Constriction has been fixed, and in the discussion page I've responded to your concerns on asphyxia vs cardiac arrest, along with titles of scientific papers on the topic. I can forward the PDF of one of those papers if you want, the other (Hardy, 1994) I can't get ahold of online. Mokele 17:03, 30 August 2007

Thank you Peter for redirecting the page that contained unverifiable content about J. Kevin Barlow. It appears a former disgruntled employee who was terminated for theft has opted to use a valuable service such as Wikipedia for waging a vendetta. There is no evidence or validity to the statement made on the page you saw. Thank you, D-Advocate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by D-Advocate (talk • contribs) 13:13, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Peter b! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 0 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

J. Kevin Barlow - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:55, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Global warming controversy

Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Global warming controversy, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Wikipedia:General sanctions/Climate change probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.

The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. -- TS 01:03, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

J. Kevin Barlow, which you created, has now been proposed for deletion. PatGallacher (talk) 23:36, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suta (genus)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Suta (genus), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.kingsnake.com/oz/snakes/elapids/snigriceps.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:44, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. When you recently edited Jack Harkness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Factotum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Unlinking

Hello, Peter B.. You have new messages at ReelAngelGirl's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re: No meteors in ISS video clip Aurora_Australis_2.ogv

Hi Peter b, Yes you are right. I am sure the original explanation on the source page attributed the lights to meteors but it seems the description has been changed and they are now attributed to satellites. Originalwana (talk) 12:09, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited Quake (natural phenomenon), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SOHO (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:54, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed the link so it explicitly points to the correct page. Peter b (talk) 04:35, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Canowindra

Hi. I suggest reading Wikipedia:Write the article first before reverting me again. Cheers, Mattinbgn (talk) 22:35, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reorganization of Meteoroid proposed

Hi Peter B., I believe that the meteoroid article is currently poorly structured. I have proposed a re-organization at Talk:Meteoroid#Re-organization needed. Perhaps you could look over my proposal at User:HopsonRoad/sandbox and make a recommendation. Sincerely, User:HopsonRoad 02:02, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kind remarks on my proposal at my Sandbox, Peter. I have already moved the article across, so you can work on it directly! Cheers, User:HopsonRoad 13:35, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Petroleum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Permeability (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Katonga River, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lake George (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Katonga River (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Watershed

Lake Victoria (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Lake Albert

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Lolcat, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Otterathome (talk) 12:16, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Lolcat. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gain consensus at WP:RSN before using kymm anywhere, it's already been dismissed as a RS. Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_152#Know_Your_Meme_on_ASMR, Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_61#Is_Know_Your_Meme_a_reliable_source_on_viral_videos.3F, Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2014_August_14#22:26:47.2C_14_August_2014_review_of_submission_by_Eventhorizon51 etc... Otterathome (talk) 11:21, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Peter B.. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Peter B.. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to pseudoscience and fringe science, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Doug Weller talk 08:53, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]