User talk:Perz00

CS1 error on Hawpa

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Hawpa, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "generic title" error. References show this error when they have a generic placeholder title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:01, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Hawpa

Hello, Perz00,

Thank you for creating Hawpa.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article relies heavily on sources from Hawpa. More secondary sources are required to establish notablity. I'm going to move this to draftspace once I've cleaned it up to remove material which relies on Telegram, which is not a reliable source.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|TarnishedPath}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TarnishedPath^talk 01:20, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hawpa moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Hawpa. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and It relies heavily on primary sources from Hawpa. This article as currently written requires additional secondary sources to establish notability. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. TarnishedPath^talk 01:30, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hawpa (July 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of your references are unreliable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hawpa and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

C F A 💬 17:14, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Perz00! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! C F A 💬 17:14, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]