User talk:Pemba.mpimaji

Welcome!

Hello, Pemba.mpimaji, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 19:02, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Click symbols

This page contains click symbols from the Khoekhoe language. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols.

Hi Pemba.mpimaji! the lateral click in ǁKaras Region has a particular IPA symbol, the ǁ. You can see this and the other three clicks of Khoekhoegowab in the infobox to your right. You find these symbols underneath the editing window if you select "IPA" from the drop-down menu. Please don't change any further occurrences of the click symbol ǁ into two forward slashes //, as this spelling is not correct. I will undo your changes to Tses‎ and a dozen other pages now, no worries. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to contact me.

The reason that newspapers and government officials spell it "//" is that word processing software and typewriters cannot produce the correct symbol. For a longer discussion on how to spell ǁKaras Region, please see Talk:ǁKaras Region. Cheers, Pgallert (talk) 08:51, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help:Minor edit

I notice that most of your edits are marked as minor. You should read Help:Minor edit as I do not believe most of your edits qualify. - GB fan 13:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Flexible Land Tenure System (Namibia)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Flexible Land Tenure System (Namibia), Pemba.mpimaji!

Wikipedia editor Pgallert just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for writing this up! If you have any questions or if you need assistance, please don't hesitate to contact me.

To reply, leave a comment on Pgallert's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Pgallert (talk) 09:00, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of tribes in Uganda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baamba. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:36, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Gibana has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Gibana. Thanks! 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 12:57, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Added as requested Pemba.mpimaji (talk) 18:10, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gibana (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sionk was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Surely if this existed there would be something other than student theses that mentioned it?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gibana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sionk (talk) 20:36, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it seems that you are in doubt whether this subject ever exists. You mentioned “Surely if this existed there would be something other than student theses that mentioned it?”

I came across GIBANA during a consulting work and found little information on it. That is why I drafted this submission.

The main source (legal term, but not well defined) is the South Sudan Local Government Act and the article has a proper reference to it. An Act is no student thesis. Secondly, there are more references to PhD theses, and these are also no “student work”! which maybe be considered as inproper source.

In a nutshell, these are all sources that I could find about Gibana and I cann assure you that the draft has multiple published sources that are in-depth, reliable, secondary and independent of the subject. All criteria for submission on Wikipedia are fulfilled and the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article! Please let me know if and why you still have a different view on it. If you are really still in doubt, please have a look at the mentioned references. Pemba.mpimaji (talk) 11:30, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose of Wikipedia is to collate information about subjects that has already been written. If you found little information on gibana, it's unlikely to be a suitable subject for Wikpedia. Sionk (talk) 16:21, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gibana (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EmeraldRange was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

no change since last submission- one added source doesn't mention "gibana" nor "gevana".

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gibana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 14:29, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In summary, the draft refers to multiple published sources that are in-depth, reliable, secondary and independent of the subject.

I don´t understand your additional comment about the "added source". This source was added by another user but it mentions "gibana tax" (see section 74 in the PDF). However, I moved the reference to the first paragraph as it was a duplicate. Pemba.mpimaji (talk) 17:50, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pemba.mpimaji! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 14:29, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Gibana

Hello, Pemba.mpimaji. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gibana, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gibana (April 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please don't resubmit without addressing concerns. Since the previous decline, the only substantial change is the removal of a source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gibana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 07:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gibana (July 20)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by SL93 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: The one added source since the last decline shows no notability.

SL93 (talk) 23:33, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]