User talk:Peilin99

Welcome

Hello, Peilin99, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 10:09, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

November 2017

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Jonny Evans, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

The "show preview" button is right next to the "save page" button and below the edit summary field.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. GS ⋙ ☎ 10:10, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Jonny Evans, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. It is not an appropriate image to use while it includes a fan. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:07, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017–18 West Bromwich Albion F.C. season

It is important that the information in a Wikipedia article is consistent with its sources. If you change a transfer fee from "Undisclosed" to a value (e.g. £13m), please also add a citation to say where you got that information from. The transfer info in 2017–18 West Bromwich Albion F.C. season now says one thing whereas the sources used say something different, which is very confusing for readers. --Jameboy (talk) 15:49, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Virgil van Dijk, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:25, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2018 Changchun Yatai F.C. season - moved to Draft:2018 Changchun Yatai F.C. season

Hi Peilin99, Greetings. Pls note that your creation of 2018 Changchun Yatai F.C. season has been moved to Draft:2018 Changchun Yatai F.C. season. Content added/edited in Wikipedia needs "inline citation" from independent (third party / secondary / tertiary) reliable source (in any language) for verification to gauge the nobility criteria is met. The articles's inline citation is the WP:BURDEN which it is on the person adding the information. Please note official website, records of sport events or individual player records are consider primary source and not independent source, and social network source such as facebook, twitter, instagram, imbd and etc are considered NOT reliable source and can not be used for citing. Independent reliable source are sources are those obtain from major newspaper, such as The Guardian, Sydney Morning Herald, CNN news and etc. or source obtain from major publisher of the work (for example, Random House or Cambridge University Press). Pls see

reliable source - see WP:RS
primary vs secondary vs tiartiary source - see WP:WPNOTRS
verification - see WP:V
notability - see WP:N
webcite - see WP:CITEWEB and its template -see Template: cite web

Once you have provided inline citations, you could move back the page to "article" to resubmit. Lastly, I strongly encourage you to visit WP:The Wikipedia Adventure for there some short and fun exercises on neutrality, verifiability, collaboration, research and sourcing. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 11:49, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pellin99, the page has been reviewed and you could find it here - 2018 Changchun Yatai F.C. season.Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 23:22, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Peilin99. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jonny Evans, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:49, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Steve Heighway, you may be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:20, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't do any disruptive editing, if you look at the source Heighway did win 5 league titles including the one in 1980.

July 2021

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jordan Pickford. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:46, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Jordan Henderson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:54, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Wu Lei shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Longhair\^talk 23:49, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:

{{unblock|Why was I blocked? Martins left Wuhan at the end of 2020 Chinese Super league season and is now a free agent, this is fact}}

. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sources, re Martin Taylor

Please understand that, when you make changes or additions to a biography of a living person, you must add a reference to a reliable published source that verifies your change or addition. It doesn't matter that it's "fact" that Martin Taylor is Caleb Taylor's father, you need to add a source to verify that at the same time as you add the content. If it's "fact", it shouldn't be difficult for you to find one.

I've done it for you on this occasion, but please don't keep ignoring what people say to you. Thank you. Struway2 (talk) 10:42, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding it for me, however I'm sure there're nicer, less intimidating and condescending ways to talk to people who're trying their best to make information on wikipedia more complete,and it shouldn't be difficult for you to find one. Peilin99 (talk) 11:26, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thing is, when I arrive at a talk page and find that its owner has been previously blocked and repeatedly advised about and warned for the same thing, I don't find it so easy to maintain the good faith I arrived with. You're right though, it's no justification for an uncollegial tone, and I'll try to remember that going forward. Struway2 (talk) 11:48, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your understanding. Most of the times if there's a formal report of the event I always add sources to the text, for instance a transfer announcement or a match report etc, however the only time I was blocked from editing, I found it incredibly unfair. If you follow football you'll know that if a player's contract with a club expires he automatically becomes a free agent so I just deleted the player's current club information, how could I possibly source it when a player becomes free agent? There'll be no report of that, it just happens...Anyway, I've made over 1000 edits since 2017, especially upon the Chinese football related contents, so many Chinese and foreign players' information and statistics had not been updated for years before I stepped in. I don't get paid a single penny for my continued efforts, I did them purely because of my passion on football and my wish to help people who may find them useful. I'm proud of myself doing them, and I hope they mean something to other people. That's why I might not particularly appreciate the tone in the previous message, but that's all past now...I hope you enjoy the rest of your day. Peilin99 (talk) 14:08, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello, I'm Robby.is.on. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Eninho, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 20:14, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at B. F. Skinner. Sundayclose (talk) 14:04, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dara O'Shea

The issue isn't that the content is unrefefence (although that is a problem, and I can see that you have been warned for this multiple times before). The issue is that the content you are adding is not notable. We are an encyclopedia, not a sorts almanac. Giant Snowman 11:29, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, yes, I've been reminded of this a few times before and I've tried my best to make sure I add references since then. I hope I have added enough relevant references to my content for the O'shea page now. Thank you for helping me improve my editings. Peilin99 (talk) 11:59, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Timothy Weah. Giant Snowman 18:12, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you look at reference 43, which was already added before my edit, Juventus had inserted a link called 'press release' which specifically indicated the transfer fee and length of contract for this transfer. I don't understand why that was 'unsourced or poorly sourced material', this is extremely clearly sourced information. Peilin99 (talk) 18:18, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why you consistently sabotage my content, I told you if you open the link for reference 43 you'll see the club has attached a document called 'press release' which very clearly indicates a transfer fee for €10.3 million. The structure of Italian clubs makes them compulsory to publicate that information, so it's not 'undisclosed fee' in the first place. Could you please listen to people before calling their justified edit 'persistent vandalism'? Peilin99 (talk) 18:28, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Which is not reported by third-party sources... Giant Snowman 18:30, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Chinese Super League table moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to 2024 Chinese Super League table. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:04, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I don't understand the decision as the table directly comes from the main page of '2024 Chinese Super League', which has a perfectly good source of soccerway. It's a live table and changes every week with the results of the games, and I need this template for my 2024 Changchun Yatai page. Peilin99 (talk) 21:38, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can do a command like this: (see source code from this section to see how I did it; it essentially allows you to access any league table without creating a template) and if there's multiple league tables in an article, you can do so by adding a transclusion to the specific section (just need to find the section name in the source code from the article itself, or designate one yourself) to the template.

Pos	Team v t e	Pld	W	D	L	GF	GA	GD	Pts
7	Zhejiang	30	11	5	14	55	60	−5	38
8	Henan	30	9	9	12	34	39	−5	36
9	Changchun Yatai	30	8	8	14	46	58	−12	32^[a]
10	Qingdao West Coast	30	8	8	14	41	58	−17	32^[a]
11	Wuhan Three Towns	30	8	7	15	31	44	−13	31

Source: Soccerway
Rules for classification:

During season: 1) Points; 2) Head-to-head points; 3) Head-to-head goal difference; 4) Head-to-head goals scored; 5) Goal difference; 6) Goals scored; 7) Rankings in the previous season. (Rules 2 to 4 are only applied when teams concerned have finished both/all the matches against others.)
After season: 1) Points; 2) Head-to-head points; 3) Head-to-head goal difference; 4) Head-to-head goals scored; 5) Goal difference; 6) Goals scored; 7) Disciplinary points (yellow card = 1 point, red card = 3 points); 8) Drawing of lots.
Notes:

^ ^a ^b Changchun Yatai are ahead of Qingdao West Coast on head-to-head points: Changchun Yatai 4, Qingdao West Coast 1

Pos	Team v t e	Pld	W	D	L	GF	GA	GD	Pts	Qualification
1	Binzhou Huilong	3	3	0	0	8	0	+8	9	Qualification for Qualifying round
2	Yingkou Chaoyue	3	1	1	1	3	4	−1	4	Qualification for Qualifying round
3	Shandong Scout	3	0	2	1	2	4	−2	2	Qualification for Third-placed playoffs
4	Jingchuan Wenhui	3	0	1	2	1	6	−5	1	Qualification for Fourth-placed playoffs

Source: ^{[citation needed]}
Rules for classification: 1) Points; 2) Head-to-head points; 3) Head-to-head goal difference; 4) Head-to-head goals scored; 5) Goal difference; 6) Goals scored; 7) Disciplinary points (yellow card = 1 point, red card as a result of two yellow cards = 3 points, direct red card = 3 points, yellow card followed by direct red card = 4 points); 8) Drawing of lots.

IDontHaveSkype (talk) 21:26, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jovan Malcolm. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Giant Snowman 16:35, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How was it 'unconstructive edits'?? Before my edit the information appeared chaotic and incomplete, I made significant improvements to make the page much more organized. Peilin99 (talk) 16:45, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The way you have constantly sabotaged my edit is borderline racism. If you revert my edit again I'll have to consider calling the police. Peilin99 (talk) 17:06, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added useful information and valid references to the page and made it much clearer and more organized, who are you to decide 'there's no benefit' to my edit? STOP sabotaging my edit right now!! Or I'll do whatever I can to fight you on this!!! You have a little tiny bit of power and the way you abuse them is just truly disgusting. Peilin99 (talk) 17:13, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:22, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Peilin99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I know I appear emotional and I do apologize for it. However, this user 'GiantSnowman' constantly picks up on me and sabotages my edit. Jovan Malcolm is a player who used to play for the team I support and I know his career track fairly well, the informtion is his page before my edit was incomplete and fairly chaotic in terms of his first team career and loan spells interwinding with each other. I added key information including his first team debut and league debut, deleting redundant information such as 'being linked away...in 2019', and added valid references and catalogue to make the page look much more organized. I think every single person except 'GiantSnowman' would agree I made the page a better version. However he just keeps reverting my edit without giving any reasonable explanation, him saying 'can't see any benefit' does not constitute a good explanation at all. I'm just so extremely furious at this, the way he communicates with other editors suggest very clearly how arrogant and condescending he is to almost everymore. I'm deeply offended by this and when I talked to other people they suggest it could be just because of racism. Please look at the situation reasonably and unblock me. I have been constantly contributing to Wikipedia for more than 6 years, especially to the area of Chinese football. You just cannot let someone with such an amount of contribution like myself be blocked indefinitely because of some arrogant dictator like him.

Decline reason:

I'm surprised you hoped an unblock request like this would succeed. Rather than addressing your legal threats, you launch personal attacks, accusing an editor of racism and an editor (or an admin, this is unclear) of being a dictator. I'll warn you, another request like this and you'll almost certainly lose talk page access. Yamla (talk) 18:17, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Because you were in dispute with me in relation to an article, you accused me of racism and repeatedly threatened to call the police. Now in your unblock request you have repeated your allegations of racism and also called me an "arrogant dictator". You are clearly not fit to edit and I suggest the reviewing admin rejects your unblock request. Giant Snowman 18:12, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:2024 Chinese Super League table

Hello, Peilin99. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2024 Chinese Super League table, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have been blocked 'indefinitely' because some pessimistic character who thinks he can be a giant dictator but is actually less than nothing in real life calls my hard work 'vandalism'. I wish everyone on wikipedia can be as polite as you and appreciate the contribution of editors instead of deleting everything they do straight away and then calling their edit 'vandalism' just because of a little bit of disagreements of the content. Peilin99 (talk) 05:17, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Yamla (talk) 10:09, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2024 Chinese Super League table

Hello, Peilin99. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "2024 Chinese Super League table".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:00, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[table_hth_CCY0.68946022432738-1] Changchun Yatai are ahead of Qingdao West Coast on head-to-head points: Changchun Yatai 4, Qingdao West Coast 1

[a]