User talk:Pchelpcentre

Pchelpcentre, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Pchelpcentre! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:21, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. The discussion is about the topic Intelligent Platform Management Interface. Thank you. GreenReaper (talk) 02:56, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

You have edited a number of articles to insert a mention of a patent by Adrian Richard White, along with a citation to the test of the patent. this edit and this edit are typical. The patent is a primary source, and such sources must be used only with care here on Wikipedia. as WP:NOTRS says, "All interpretive claims, analyses, or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary source, rather than original analysis of the primary-source material by Wikipedia editors." The question of what current technology is ultimately derived from a specific patent is just such an "interpretive claim", and should only be inserted in an article if supported by a secondary source. Such a mention may also be a case of undue weight. Please be more careful in future edits of this sort. DES ^(talk) 15:23, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at MegaRAC, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Re-adding the patent information to multiple articles, particularly after being informed that a secondary cite was needed, and after the reverting editor (Minstrel1977) attempted to engage you on the relevant article talk pages, looks like Wikipedia:Tendentious editing, which can be grounds for an editor being blocked from editing. Please discuss the matter before trying to re-insert the claim. DES ^(talk) 22:21, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016 further edits

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Intelligent_Platform_Management_Interface. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Minstrel1977 (talk • contribs) 13:20, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]