Jump to content

User talk:Parker Gabriel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Parker Gabriel, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Nice work on the van Gogh article, good copy eitors are always welcome around here. Ceoil 21:03, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Norway Corporation Repertory Company, by I (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Norway Corporation Repertory Company seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Norway Corporation Repertory Company, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:39, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Norway Corporation Repertory Company, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Parker Gabriel 22:13, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:MOS

[edit]

Peter, will you kindly quit undoing my fixes to Norway Corporation. The appearance of articles is determined by the manual of style. I'm trying to help you, to make your article conform to those standards; but you're just undoing my changes. Don't go complaining on the help desk that your stuff gets deleted when you're not willing to cooperate with other editors. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 22:45, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding my revisions

[edit]

I had written what I had written without full knowledge of the MOS. I apologize for any conflicts or misunderstandings that this might have caused.

For the record, my personal name is Parker, not Peter. That is, admittedly, a common mistake.

Parker Gabriel 22:54, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, sorry, too much spiderman. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 22:56, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Norway Corporation Repertory Company

[edit]

When I wrote about Norway Corporation, Gene Roddenberry's company, I used the unofficial reference of Norway Corporation Repertory Company for all actors and actresses who had acted out roles in works directly connected to Roddenberry's authorship or production.

I might very well have lost any permission to discuss the reference in a wiki article myself, but I'm not averse to anyone else writing such an article.

Parker Gabriel 23:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Partridge Family FAQ?

[edit]

Can anyone else editing The Partridge Family include a list of Frequently Asked Questions in regard to it?

Those who can do that have my thanx. Parker Gabriel 01:04, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Parker please make sure that you contribute information that is correct and necessary. The changes you made to this article were largely damaging, and those that weren't were simply uneccesary. (ie: "Together" was not the recording they made in the pilot, there was no such person as Brian Partridge, etc.) Please trust that the information in this article is accurate and true to the program, and avoid re-arranging sections that are already well-formed. As far as adding a "Frequently Asked Questions" section, you are welcome to do that but please honor the articles integrity. Thank you for your help dear. ShirleyPartridge 08:11, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Only Victims

[edit]

I had found one credit from Robert Vaughn to be sadly overlooked--his having written Only Victims: A Study Of Show Business Blacklisting. I believed that any failure to refer to that would be remiss, and so I remedied that flaw. Parker Gabriel 23:11, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Serial vanisher

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Serial vanisher requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- ALLSTARecho 09:07, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why "serial vanishers" may be relevant, especially to the FBI

[edit]

I have seen several installments of Without A Trace, the television series program about Federal Bureau of Investigation personnel who track down missing persons, and have been considering the possibility of persons who deliberately disappear more than once--"serial vanishers," who force the FBI to waste valuable time, effort, and resources human and otherwise in tracking them down, only to discover that those persons had already deliberately disappeared again before they could be found.

When Adam Walsh was abducted, his father, John Walsh, was aggrieved and enraged enough at what eventually happened to his only son to, in time, become the relentless pursuer of fugitives that he became. Daniel J. Travanti, impersonating him in the made-for-TV film Adam, noted in one of his lines of dialogue, "The police can help you find your stolen truck, but not your stolen child?"

But what if that child did not WANT to be found in the first place? What if he, or she, in order not to be found, kept disappearing from sight time after time and again and again?

That was what motivated my contribution on serial vanishers, and I apologize if I made it in violation of Wikipedia's guidelines. Parker Gabriel (talk) 05:31, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rollin Hand

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Rollin Hand, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Willy Armitage. Thank you. Jdrewitt (talk) 17:31, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]
File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Sue Thomas with a friend.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. [midnight comet] [talk] 14:09, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elvis Presley, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages BMI and Tom Jones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Done Too Soon (Neil Diamond song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Lindsay Lohan, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 01:47, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

recent edits to Cliff Richard

[edit]

It appears you made some incorrect punctuation changes to the article. Please see WP:LQ. In short, if the punctuation is not part of the name of the work or formatting, it should remain outside the formatting for the work. This means quotes for songs or italics for albums. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Elvis Presley

[edit]

Please stop making edits to the Elvis Presley article. Your edits are mostly quite odd—changing names to formal names not reflected in sources, introducing strange text, or violating the Manual of Style. This is a Featured article and we need to maintain the highest quality of writing, sourcing, and MoS compliance. Please get some more editing practice and ensure you are following established styles and guidelines. --Laser brain (talk) 20:23, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Parker Gabriel. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Banapple gas

[edit]

The article Banapple gas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable sources, probably a hoax

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WWGB (talk) 06:38, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Banapple gas, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Avicennasis @ 07:20, 9 Shevat 5777 / 07:20, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Parker Gabriel. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, Parker Gabriel. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Star Trek Movie Memories for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Star Trek Movie Memories is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Trek Movie Memories until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:29, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

[edit]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the The Caine Mutiny (film) plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 02:35, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Caine Mutiny (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Francis. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, The Village Of Brambleshire Wood, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Gpkp [utc] 07:23, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

[edit]

I wanted to follow up about your recent edits to Eliot Ness. This edit added helpful detail, but you moved punctuation inside the wiki markup, which is incorrect. At first I thought maybe it was an accident, but in this edit it is clearly a deliberate move. Please don't do that; the commas, semicolons, and periods are not part of the titles and are not supposed to be italicized. Thanks. Grandpallama (talk) 14:08, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced claim about Oreos at Cross of Lorraine

[edit]

See [1]. I've removed it. Doug Weller talk 16:37, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Parker Gabriel. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Village Of Brambleshire Wood, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:01, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Hitro talk 14:43, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Parker Gabriel! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 14:43, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Mod Squad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daniel Stern.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jennifer Garner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alias.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Parker Gabriel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Village Of Brambleshire Wood".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 16:42, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 06:30, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Despite many, many warnings over the years, your edits to Tom Jones (singer) were blatant Manual of Style violations and have been reverted as such. Your editing pattern is completely unacceptable. You have exhausted the community's patience. Graham87 06:30, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Understood.
I will seek nothing else to do with Wikipedia. Parker Gabriel 06:44, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Parker Gabriel. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Village Of Brambleshire Wood".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:07, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As I have been blocked indefinitely as of March 29, and have been seeking nothing else to do with Wikipedia since then, I will not request reclaiming of the draft.
Parker Gabriel 21:19, 21 August 2022 (UTC) Parker Gabriel 21:19, 21 August 2022 (UTC)