Jump to content

User talk:PapayaWiki105

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: QC Entertainment (June 13)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lopifalko was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Lopifalko (talk) 17:48, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, PapayaWiki105! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lopifalko (talk) 17:48, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: QC Entertainment (October 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SamHolt6 (talk) 00:34, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: QC Entertainment (October 23)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SamHolt6 (talk) 22:27, 23 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: QC Entertainment (October 29)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 02:51, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: QC Entertainment (November 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by SamHolt6 were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Despite multiple re-submissions and notes by reviewers, the draft has not seen any (per the edit history [2]) marked improvements; the notability remains in doubt, unreliable sources remain cited, and the unreferenced lists remain. As such, I am inclined to mark this topic as unsuitable for the encyclopedia, and am rejecting the draft.
SamHolt6 (talk) 06:10, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Editing with a possible paid conflict of interest

[edit]
Information icon

Hello PapayaWiki105. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:PapayaWiki105. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=PapayaWiki105|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --SamHolt6 (talk) 23:35, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! It's been almost three months since you were asked to do this, and you still haven't. When someone says "do not edit further until you answer this message", the expectation is that you will do as you've been asked before editing anywhere else. Your next edit in this project should be to place an appropriate disclosure on your user-page, as instructed above. You must also ensure that you disclose your paid status whenever discussing the company you work for on any other Wikipedia page. Thanks, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:15, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:QC Entertainment

[edit]

Hello, PapayaWiki105. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "QC Entertainment".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Eternal Shadow Talk 15:45, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]