User talk:Paleoarchaeo

Thanks for your comments

But I do need to know how Hyksosneter and you happen to be using the same computer. And this editor[1] certainly seems to be you, different device, same location. I'm a WP:Checkuser/

And as the scarab itself seems genuine although I am told that ". None of these signs relate to the Egyptian cities the author lists. The supposed representation of the Nile on the scarab is actually a commonly seen motif on Second Intermediate scarabs, a lotus plant. Particular mention is made of the sign of Neith with it being mooted that it represents the Egyptian city of Memphis because there was a shrine to Neith there. Perhaps there was. However if Memphis was to be represented by an Egyptian god it would have been the god Ptah; the principal location of the cult of Neith was at the city of Sais far in the North! It is stated as a firm fact that ancient Memphis was on the east bank of the ancient Nile. This is a conjecture, not a fact."Doug Weller talk 10:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In relation to the previous ds/alert

Blanking messages from this page is fine and considered like a reception confirmation (WP:BLANKING). Because of the edit summary I thought I'd mention that topics like flood geology and Young Earth creationism are indeed covered by WP:PSCI and WP:ARBPS (pseudoarchaeology). But also that editors don't get blocked or banned because of personal beliefs (it's a collaborative project that encourages diversity), only if it is necessary to stop their editing. Before a block or ban, they should have received warnings already, allowing them to learn how Wikipedia works. The {{ds/alert|ps}} notice is not part of WP:WARN but is for anyone who edits in the area and is renewable every 12 months. —Paleo Neonate – 12:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]