User talk:PSS356

Speedy deletion nomination of Ku-Ku Band

Hello PSS356,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ku-Ku Band for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. :) (talk) 09:48, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PSS356, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi PSS356! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Technical 13 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Webit moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Webit, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 14:37, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@PSS356 The article is written in a promotional tone and is written more like an advert. See WP:NPOV. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 14:39, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ~ Eejit43, many thanks for your feedback and for sharing your tips. I will follow them and try to correct the content. The purpose of the page is not to advertise. I want to create the page because I think the topic would be helpful to the audience. PSS356 (talk) 15:18, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Eejit43

Hello again. I've made some edits to the content, trying to avoid sounding promotional. Is it okay now and needs more edits before I resubmit it for review? Thanks for your assistance! PSS356 (talk) 14:50, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That looks much better! I'll submit the draft for review, and may review it if I have time later!

~ Eejit43 (talk) 14:59, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Eejit43

Thank you for your time and help! 130.185.231.247 (talk) 15:22, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Of course!! :) ~ Eejit43 (talk) 15:23, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, @Eejit43 I hope all is well with you!

I have a question. How long does it usually take to approve a Wikipedia article? Thank you in advance. PSS356 (talk) 14:40, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@PSS356 it can sometimes take up to 3 months, however it is not impossible for it to be a lot sooner. ~ Eejit43 (talk) 16:37, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Webit has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Webit. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:31, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Webit (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Despite heroic WP:REFBOMBING, notability perWP:GNG / WP:ORGCRIT is not established, as the sources consist of a mix of churnalism, passing mentions, primary and non-reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Webit and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:39, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, PSS356. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Webit, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:40, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the feedback.

I have no relationship with people, places and things at all. The only reason I try to create pages on a specific topic is because I believe they are worthwhile and significant. Also, creating Wikipedia content is a hobby I want to develop. I'm interested in learning how to do it, so any help would be appreciated. Thank you! PSS356 (talk) 06:48, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help request

Hi, it looks like you are having technical issues staying connected to IRC. Therefore, for further assistance, I would suggest posting on the Articles for Creation Help Desk who can give you longer form answers - Rich^T|C|E-Mail 11:27, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Webit (July 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Echoing the previous decline comment - "the sources consist of a mix of churnalism, passing mentions, primary and non-reliable sources." Sources like Gritdaily, Forbes (contributor) and others cannot be used.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Webit and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 22:55, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Webit

Hello, PSS356. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Webit".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 01:10, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]