User talk:POLNET55

Welcome!

Hello, POLNET55, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! 115ash^→(☏) 10:26, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello, I'm Scjessey. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Presidency of Donald Trump, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Scjessey (talk) 13:32, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Social dialogue

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://www.zurnalai.vu.lt/socialine-teorija-empirija-politika-ir-praktika/article/view/11425/9949. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:02, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited M-government, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agency (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:38, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sustainability marketing myopia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Environment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:02, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Media of Belarus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Media (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:37, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Co-production (public services), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Network, Power and Trust (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits and linking to disambiguation pages

Hey POLNET55, two little things:

I see you marking many of your edits as minor when they aren't; you should really only do this for absolutely obvious edits, like a spelling correction - see WP:MINOR
In your latest edit to Co-production (public services), you inserted 2 links to disambiguation pages; this makes it unclear what you're actually referring to

These are understandable (I myself still mark an edit as minor mistakenly sometimes), so don't worry. If you have questions, feel free to ask them here or on my talk page. Kind regards from PJvanMill (talk) 20:34, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited COVID-19 pandemic in Lithuania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Test.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:40, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Smart city, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monitoring.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ENGO, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Network.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Humboldt Forum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Equality.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello, POLNET55. We welcome your contributions, but it appears as if your primary purpose on Wikipedia is to add citations to research published by a small group of researchers.

Editing in this way is a violation of the policy against using Wikipedia for promotion and is a form of conflict of interest in Wikipedia – please see WP:SELFCITE and WP:MEDCOI. The editing community considers excessive self-citing to be a form of spamming on Wikipedia (WP:REFSPAM); the edits will be reviewed and the citations removed where it was not appropriate to add them.

Scientific articles should prefer secondary sources to ensure that the information added is trusted by the scientific community.

The editing community highly values expert contributors, so I do hope you will consider contributing more broadly. If you wish to contribute, please first consider citing review articles written by other researchers in your field and which are already highly cited in the literature. If you wish to cite your own research, please start a new section on the article's talk page and add {{request edit}} to ask a volunteer to review whether or not the citation should be added.

MrOllie (talk) 14:56, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 15:36, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have also reviewed your edits and agree with MrOllie that they are problematic. Please refrain from citing your own work in the future. If you wish for your work to be included, then make a request on the article talk page first. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 16:53, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for personal attacks

You have been blocked for 60 hours for a series of personal attacks on User talk:MrOllie. Bishonen | tålk 12:47, 22 February 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Nothing original, You can just block:) POLNET55 (talk) 14:35, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your latest unexplained reverts look as though they are meant to harass MrOllie. I sincerely hope that's not the case. M.Bitton (talk) 18:54, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 19:42, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Harassment at User talk:MrOllie

Don't post on User talk:MrOllie again or you will be permanently blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bishonen | tålk 20:06, 2 April 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Oho! You are guys seems not interesting in other opinion. MrOllie decided that scientific works is spam, but I think he/she has conflict of interest that is why try to discriminate me. Now you decided that my messages is harassment. Is you behavior really adequate? POLNET55 (talk) 05:02, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for contravening Wikipedia's harassment policy.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Courcelles (talk) 20:13, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Misread the time stamp and thought that warning was from your last block… but I can’t see any reason to unblock you, either. Two incidents of blockable harassment in under 70 edits is quite enough. Courcelles (talk) 20:23, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion it is unhonest to block for position and contribution to Wikipedia. Mr OLLIE cant on his/her own decide what is good and what is not. If we will discuss with any committee of ethics you will see that his/her position is not objective as he/she is fighting against me but not thinks about the whole content of the article. It is mentioned in the WIKIPEDIA rules that users cant say bad things about editors but here is real discrimination. My proposal to meet on zoom and discuss how it looks like face to face. POLNET55 (talk) 06:55, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are not right. I'm editing Wikipedia more than 10 years and my added edits cant be considered as spam absolutelly. I more than sure that the attention to me from the Mr OLLLIE is looking as discriminating me as member of Wikipedia. I have not such rights like he/she. Your block is also discriminating I'm not kid and you must discuss if all my 70 edits are worse. POLNET55 (talk) 07:41, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]