User talk:PJT1957

This is PJT1957's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Christchurch Dragon has been accepted

Christchurch Dragon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:31, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Magnum Bonum Potato (November 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

We're sorry, but we cannot accept blank submissions. Please consider submitting to Wikipedia:Requested articles instead. If in fact you did include text within the article, but it isn't showing, please make sure that any extra text above your entry is removed, as it may be causing it to hide and not be shown to the reviewer.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Magnum Bonum Potato and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:18, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Magnum Bonum Potato

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Magnum Bonum Potato, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 05:18, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mudeford

Hi PJT1957, Nice to see another Christchurch resident on Wikipedia (I make that four now). Do you have a reference for the information you recently inserted[1] into the Mudeford article as the current one doesn't support it? I thought the first permanent coastguard station was built in 1863 on Fisherman's Bank and that prior to that the coast was patrolled by revenue men stationed at Christchurch Barracks. I could be wrong of course, it's a long time since I did any reading on the subject. Penbat, do you recall anything? Best regards--Ykraps (talk) 20:18, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ykraps, Thanks for your welcome. I'm just trying to record some of my research into Christchurch's history. The dates for the pre-Stanpit Coastguard Station are derived from a range of sources. Working backwards in time, evidence that the Haven House was employed as a Coastguard Station is recorded here: 1861 Census (Chief Officer: Alfred B Williams); 1851 Census (Chief Officer: Lt Edward Kennett); 1844 Tithe Map (The Mudeford and Stanpit Handbook, Allen White), which confirms that both the Haven House and adjacent row of cottages were held by the “Preventive Station”.; 1826 Hampshire Advertiser: “a little boy, about three years old, son of one of the men belonging to the coast-guard, left his home at the Haven House, and has not been seen or heard of since.”; Pre-1826 National Archives ADM175/2 Coastguard Establishment Books 1816-1819 (Free download) records that the Christchurch Station was established in 1818 with a single Boatman, but its location is not specified. Lt Samuel Umfreville and six Boatmen were appointed to the Christchurch Station in 1822, the year the Coast Guard was created. In January 1822 the Salisbury and Winchester Journal advertised that the Haven House was available to let and I have found no reference to its use as a lodging house after that date, leading to my speculation that it was utilised by the Coastguard from about that date. I have not investigated where the immediate predecessor of the Coastguard, the Preventive Water Guard, was based, but I have newspaper references to the Preventive Boat dating back to 1815. With regard to the Stanpit site, I have newspaper clippings from 1861 that invite builders’ tenders for a Coastguard Station. However, I have not yet found the precise date when the new Station became operational – though I suspect that it will have been mentioned in the Christchurch Times. Kind regards PJT1957 (talk) 17:51, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have rewritten the paragraph to make it sound less speculative and incorporated some text from later in the article which was mildly repetitive. I hope you are okay with my edits. I have referenced what I can, can you add the missing citations? Thanks--Ykraps (talk) 10:39, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Incidently, can I draw your attention to User talk:Penbat#Stour or Avon? If I can get some agreement, I will endeavour to have the file moved.--Ykraps (talk) 10:57, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments. I have reappraised my entry for Haven House and added further details and citations. I have also decided that it merits its own heading (like the other local buildings), and this has necessitated the repositioning of some unrelated paragraphs. I hope this all looks OK. Nudge me if not. I will obviously continue to update this article if better citations are discovered. I may create more headings later (eg: ‘Early history’ and perhaps ‘Shipwrecks’) to cover other topics.

Incidentally, do you have any other references for the 1802 lifeboat and 1809 wreck? Mike Powell’s book does not provide onward references to original sources and I have contradictory information from contemporary reports of the wreck of the Good Intent transport

With regard to the photograph query, as you suggest, this is indeed the River Avon at Town Bridge, looking across at Bridge Place from Convent Walk. Regards, Phil. PJT1957 (talk) 15:10, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I had already had thoughts of my own about creating a separate section so that's fine by me. I added back the sentence about the newer Haven Inn because I think it helps with understanding that the section is about something else. I Hope you agree. I am afraid I don't have a second reference for the lifeboat or shipwreck. I borrowed Powell's book from the library so I can't check his dates at the moment but will do when I'm next in town. I vaguely remember Hodges mentioning both in his book "The Golden Years" but again that was from the library too and I can't remember which dates he gave, if any. If there are contrary dates we can probably work them in as well and add a footnote to explain. What dates do you have?--Ykraps (talk) 20:11, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PS Thanks for confirming that is the Avon. I have found other photos describing as the Stour[[2]] and was beginning to think it was me that didn't know the difference!--Ykraps (talk) 20:15, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve found another reference to the 1802 lifeboat in Michael Hodges’ book The Smuggler: No Gentleman (Page 97) and also in his Occasional Papers in the Red House (Local Studies Resource Room) – but again without reference to the original source material. However, as Michael Hodges says, it seems clear that it was not in service for very long. There was certainly not a privately-owned lifeboat in continuous service until 1962 as the article implies.

The contemporary newspaper reports I have for the troopship wrecked in 1809 say that it ran aground at White Pit Reef, which was a short distance to the west of Double Dykes, and that the rescue was effected by troops from Christchurch Barracks under the command of two named officers. It would therefore be useful to track down the original source of the ‘local fishermen’ account. I’m working on it... PJT1957 (talk) 09:23, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I can't imagine that I would have phrased it like that, had it not been strongly suggested in Powell's book. I've yet to make time to visit the library but as I said, I will check the wording when I can. Best regards--Ykraps (talk) 16:54, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I hope you won't mind my having augmented your research on Haven House with some of my own. I think that the only information I've removed concerns the dispute over ownership of the ground, some of which was formed by filling in the old river channel. The Crown made a claim to this ground, but appears (silently) to have dropped the claim because the river bed on which it was built belonged to Clarendon as lord of the manor of Christchurch, but this doesn't explain why the whole of the Haven House appears in rentals of the manor of Somerford... Docuracy (talk) 12:31, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Docuracy, Thanks for this notification. I’m broadly happy with the additional information you’ve provided, but I may make some subsequent revisions to restore chronological sequence. I have no doubt that the Haven House fell within the general area of the Manor of Somerford, which had long-been appended to the Priory-held Manor of Christchurch-Twyneham and from 1610 had the same ownership. From 1690 this was Mary Luttrell as referenced in my original submission. In 1815, a perambulation of the Manor of Somerford actually started at the Haven House. I think this explains why Haven House appears in the rentals of the Manor of Somerford. The query then becomes how Clarendon had any claim to the land. Without researching this in detail, I can only imagine this is because of his involvement in the harbour works rather than because he was Lord of the Manor of Christchurch (which, of course, was different to the Manor of Christchurch-Twyneham). @Docuracy: Message text. PJT1957 (talk) 12:19, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Red House Museum and Gardens, Christchurch has been accepted

Red House Museum and Gardens, Christchurch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

KJP1 (talk) 06:58, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of shipwrecks in 1866, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Topsham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:27, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]