Jump to content

User talk:Osolomio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi Osolomio. I don't know why you would want a clear case of Criterion for Speedy Deletion A7 to go through AfD and waste everybody's time. To quote from the policy:

  • A7 Unremarkable people or groups. An article about a real person, group of people, band, or club that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject. If the assertion is disputed or controversial, it should be taken to AFD instead. (See Wikipedia:Deletion of vanity articles for further guidance on this criterion).

The assertion was not disputed or controversial; indeed, no assertion of notability was made at all.

Please find below our standard welcome message for new users (although your familiarity with the terms and procedures here suggests you're not a new user, per se).

Welcome, Osolomio!

Hello, Osolomio, and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm Redvers, one of the thousands of editors here at Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

  The five pillars of Wikipedia
  How to edit a page
  Help pages
  Tutorial
  How to write a great article
  Manual of Style
  Fun stuff...
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

REDVERS 21:35, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Angela might be an inclusionist, but that doesn't mean I am. At the same time, I happen to think the terms deletionist and inclusionist have passed their usefullness and should be abolished. And it wasn't a judgment call, honestly: it was clearly a CSD-A7: no claims of notability at all. Vanity article.
So, since you know about Angela, and AfD, and inclusionism, go on then, tell me: who are you really? A sockpuppet of a "real" editor or someone who's gone and come back under a new name? Coz it's a bit obvious IMHO :o) ➨ REDVERS 21:39, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, come on! Why "challenge" a "new user" this way? Er, because, as I've said from the start, you clearly weren't a new user! You made it as obvious as it could be. On the other hand, I know nothing about you... but, honestly, I'm not giving you my email address (although my IP address will be in your website's logs if you're that paranoid). I think I'll go and read up on who you are/were. You're blocked indefinately from this account, btw. Nothing personal (and you knew I had to).
Cheers ➨ REDVERS 22:01, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]