User talk:OsirisGDR

October 2023

Hello, I'm Dormskirk. I noticed that you recently removed content from Hipgnosis Songs Fund without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 20:35, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OsirisGDR. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Hipgnosis Songs Fund, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 20:01, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Hipgnosis Songs Fund, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 22:40, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello, I'm Quaerens-veritatem . I noticed that you recently removed content from Patrick Leonard about his marriage to Olivia d'Abo without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summaries . The edits were incorrect and apparently not researched. See, last paragraph of Leonard’s lede and Olivia d’Abo’s marriages. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. In the future it would be helpful to others and would avoid unnecessary time wasted on reviewing your edits if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. Repeated disruptive editing can result in the loss of editing privileges.
Thank you. Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 23:57, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another improper deletion

I'm Quaerens-veritatem . I noticed that you again removed content from Patrick Leonard about his marriage to Olivia d'Abo without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summaries . The edits were incorrect and apparently not researched. See, last paragraph of Leonard’s lede and Olivia d’Abo’s marriages. Your edits are apparently vandalism and have been reverted. Further, you have caused unnecessary time wasted on reviewing your edits since you don’t use an edit summary. Repeated disruptive editing results in the loss of editing privileges. Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 02:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:30, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Hilton (musician) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Eric Hilton (musician). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and reliable sources need to be added since there are none. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:32, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Hilton (musician) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Eric Hilton (musician), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 17:33, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 17:35, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Will add more references to the new Eric Hilton (musician) article. OsirisGDR (talk) 17:50, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eric Hilton (musician) (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by JSFarman were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia articles are neutral; please edit for tone. References that provide extensive coverage specifically about Eric Hilton are required to warrant an article separate from the Thievery Corporation.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Eric Hilton (musician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 19:36, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, OsirisGDR! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JSFarman (talk) 19:36, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]