User talk:Osamanaseem

Welcome!

Hello Osamanaseem and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributor's help page, or you can write {{helpme}} below this message along with a question and someone will be along to answer it shortly. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:52, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Hello, I'm Gogo Dodo. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added, because to me it seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:52, 4 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. [1] [2] [3] MrOllie (talk) 11:53, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. MrOllie (talk) 15:01, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am not getting one thing. Am reading about electronic signature and after much browsing and study i share a link which is explaining benefits of electronic signatures. I believe i am adding value by adding most relevant information. Do you still think is it irrelevant? Is it comes under spam? Kindly guide me more...sigh!

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Public-key cryptography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

for trustworthy systems making it suitable for use by Qualified Certificate Service Providers (CSPs.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:07, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

This is your last warning. The next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at XML Signature, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Jc3s5h (talk) 16:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ascertia logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ascertia logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:42, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, This image is the logo of Ascertia and taken from Official website. Someone from Wikipedia changed it (only size etc). I also want to keep and use this image. If there is any issue, let me know. Thanks

Speedy deletion nomination of PDF Sign&Seal

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on PDF Sign&Seal, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Harry the Dog WOOF 11:44, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ascertia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ascertia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ascertia (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Falcon Darkstar Momot (talk) 04:51, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]