Jump to content

User talk:Omnis Scientia/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3

Speedy deletion nomination of Jew or Not Jew

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jew or Not Jew, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 14:59, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JewOrNotJew.gif

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JewOrNotJew.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 June 25#Category:Cities in Sevastopol

Hi! Would you be able to quickly comment at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 June 25#Category:Cities in Sevastopol? I would really appreciate it :) HouseBlaster (talk · he/they) 21:22, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Sure thing! Omnis Scientia (talk) 21:23, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Replaceable non-free use File:Home of Peace Memorial Park.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Home of Peace Memorial Park.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:31, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Keir Starmer, edit revert with no justification

Hi there, you reverted my edit with no justification or comment on arguably one of the world's most high profile articles today. I justified at length the reason for the edit, the source and detail are repeated further down the section.

I'm not into edit warring so I'm not going to immediately revert but it's not really in good faith to go around reverting perfectly justified edits with no justification. If you had put forward even the briefest comment to justify it I could have attempted to understand. Otherwise it comes over as quite condescending. The fact that you have created a number of articles around the Jewish faith also makes me feel like you *could* be trying to overemphasise that Starmer's children are being raised Jewish when the article referenced does not explicitly support that. I'd appreciate a response so that we can resolve what you disagreed with, and why you feel that the content needs to be mentioned and referenced twice in one section. Mountaincirquetalk 19:09, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

@Mountaincirque, hello there. Well firstly, I wasn't the one who added that in, it was already there when I first came across the article on Starmer. I did read the article on Starmer where he did mention that his children were being raised in the faith of their mother, observed Shabbat, and attended synagogue. And he's mentioned this a few times and, a few days back, it became an election story as well. I think its clearly important to him and his family and I didn't think "this isn't important" was a good enough reason to remove it.
I'm not myself Jewish (my interest in it is mostly limited to Jewish sportspeople in the 20th century) so I approach the subject with sensitivity and take into account the feelings of the person themselves on the subject. Since its important to Starmer to the point he has mentioned it a number of times - one of the few personal things we actually know about him in fact - I felt it should remain in the section about his personal life.
I am sorry for not leaving an edit summary and explaining my reasons. I was in a bit of a rush and I just forgot to write one. Omnis Scientia (talk) 19:31, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Fair enough, I just felt that the mention further down was enough. I think someone else has actually added another reference now for the fact that the children are raised in the Jewish faith. As the page is so high profile today I'm going to just leave it. All the best. Mountaincirquetalk 19:58, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
All the best to you as well. And thank you for hearing me out. Much appreciated. :) Omnis Scientia (talk) 20:43, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Promotion of List of Jewish Major League Baseball players

Congratulations, Omnis Scientia! The list you nominated, List of Jewish Major League Baseball players, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.
This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Improvements to Article

I have been asking several editors about improving the article Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, but but since they will do it eventually, I was hoping that since you are capable of making necessary changes when it is most convenient, I ask you in the most humble manner that do you consider expanding the one of the articles sections? The section “Authority, powers and constraints” with sub-headings describing the legislative, executive or the royal prerogative powers of the Prime Minister in the most detailed way? This is a request to add some improvements that I think it needs. Since a new Prime Minster has been elected, I think that the page now needs to be updated with some information. 112.134.244.71 (talk) 04:53, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

I will look into it. The specific section you have singled out has its own page though so I don't think it needs anything more than a basic overview of the PM's powers. Omnis Scientia (talk) 07:48, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sheila Lochhead, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Margaret MacDonald.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:46, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: First women admitted to degrees at the University of Oxford has been accepted

First women admitted to degrees at the University of Oxford, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 02:24, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

Copyright problem icon Your edit to Delegacy for Women Students has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. TSventon (talk) 13:58, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

See the Earwig report here. TSventon (talk) 14:00, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
@TSventon, thank you for bringing it to my attention. It wasn't my intention to do so. I've further slimmed down, rewrote, and added back the info so its in line with copyright rules of Wikipedia. Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:02, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi, thank you for writing the article, by the way. I reran the Earwig report with "Use links in page" here and there are still two passages highlighted in red, one starting "The Delegacy was established" and the other starting "The Delegacy effectively took over". The article needs to be in your own words, Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing is not sufficient. TSventon (talk) 14:18, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
I've rewrote it as best as I could in my own words. Its down to 13% now which is mostly the names of organizations. Omnis Scientia (talk) 14:41, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red

Hi there, Omnis Scientia, and welcome to Women in Red. With your interest in sports and history, you should be a useful member of the project. I realize you have already written informative biographies but you might nevertheless find it useful to look through our Primer. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:37, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

D-O-D-G-E-R-S (Oh, Really? No, O'Malley!) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to D-O-D-G-E-R-S (Oh, Really? No, O'Malley!). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 02:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red August 2024

Women in Red | August 2024, Volume 10, Issue 8, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 313, 314, 315


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

  • TBD

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jane Forbes Clark has been accepted

Jane Forbes Clark, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 15:08, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Edit summary request

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:48, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

The above is especially needed at Jane Forbes Clark. Also, please read WP:OR and WP:BRD, both of which were disregarded in a recent edit to that article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I try to add an edit summary but, sometimes, for quick edits I forget to. Thank you for telling me about the preference, I'll add that. :)
I don't think I added any orignal info though. At least, not on purpose. I added because its mentioned in the cited references, even if briefly. If I'm mistaken then my apologies. Omnis Scientia (talk) 23:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Danny Kaye Dodgers Song 1962.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Danny Kaye Dodgers Song 1962.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. 185.172.241.184 (talk) 05:07, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Israel advocate BLP

Hi Omnis Scientia, I saw that you recently worked on the JDC article. Would you mind looking at my edit request for Jay Ruderman, an Israel and disability rights activist who partnered with the JDC and the Israeli government to support inclusion for people with disabilities in Israel? I would like to add this content to his article, as well as his organization's young activist affiliate lobbying the MLB to change the term "disabled list" to "injured list." Thank you very much! LiatDo (talk) 06:45, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

@LiatDo, hello there! How are you? So I went to check your edit request out and, by the looks of it, your edit request has been intacted by another user. See here. Omnis Scientia (talk) 18:08, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Omnis Scientia, thank you for looking into this! It seems that it was marked as answered by mistake as you'll see that only half of it was answered. For clarity, I crossed out what has been implemented. Thank you! LiatDo (talk) 12:24, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
I believe that the user who did so did it because, in one case, it doesn't apply to Ruderman specifically which I would agree with. Ultimately, MLB's decision to change to I.L. was a multi-person campaign so you can't give credit to Ruderman for it.
The other one I have implemented into the Activism section. Omnis Scientia (talk) 15:40, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Omnis Scientia, thank you very much for helping to update the article! LiatDo (talk) 12:29, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
No problem! :) Omnis Scientia (talk) 12:48, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stephen Greenberg has been accepted

Stephen Greenberg, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 19:23, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stephen Greenberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eastern League.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:50, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Alex Coffey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alex Coffey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Coffey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

AlexandraAVX (talk) 18:39, 29 July 2024 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:List of Negro league baseball no-hitters has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:List of Negro league baseball no-hitters. Thanks! Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:43, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Negro league baseball no-hitters has been accepted

List of Negro league baseball no-hitters, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 14:43, 23 September 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red October 2024

Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

As I said ..

I stand by my prior comments. But in the interest of dialogue and reaching a mutual acceptable - if not ideal to either of us, given our divergent views - conclusion to the matter, in accord with the values of the Project, I would propose for your consideration that both of those See alsos (the ones you deleted, and the ones you added) remain on those few(er) pages that relate to individuals who are in both lists. 2603:7000:2101:AA00:B5B4:44F9:9229:B399 (talk) 03:08, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. It's one thing for you to seek to reinsert your preferred see also. It's quite another for you to delete a perfectly acceptable see also that has been there for years. Until you started deleting it. That's not collaborative. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.153.21.19 (talk) 21:27, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
There is no discussion here. Stop adding the non-baseball related list, which is NOT exclusive to Jewish athletes but also includes athletes of Jewish descent who don't necessarily identify as Jewish, to baseball articles. I created the featured list specifically to replace that list. That you keep adding both makes no sense because they aren't as related as you make them out to be.
Now PLEASE stop this constant insistence that your preference is right simply because you say so or because its "been there for years". I made a list which passes Wikipedia accessibility standards, is properly referenced, and with a set criteria. That you don't like the list is not a good enough reason to enforce your will on me. Omnis Scientia (talk) 21:41, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
You’re not responding to reason. There is zero reason for you to make that last deletion. And to boot - you did it with tools. That is not a proper use of tools. There is no vandalism. Plus - the list is not coterminous with yours. If you won’t engage in collegial discussion, and will not self-revert (which would I would suggest be appropriate), let’s involve admins. This is feeling somewhat like ownership and I don’t like it, without collegiality and discussion. 2600:1017:B83E:2606:D444:D905:584C:B96E (talk) 01:38, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Sorry but I gave plenty of reasons; you just chose to ignore every reason and explanation I've given. I also made it clear over a month ago that I see this disruptive editing and revert it as such where ever I come across it because you have not provided a good enough reason for why you're doing it beyond "it was always there so it should remain there".
As for admin, I've already involved @Muboshgu who is active in baseball articles. I gave them links to both convos and the background because I've had it with your passive aggressive attitude and harrassment over such a minute detail. Take it up with them now. I just replaced an old list with a much better quality one I created specifically to replace the old one. I don't see what is wrong with that or why its even such a big deal. Just stop it and leave me alone. Omnis Scientia (talk) 08:27, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

New message to Omnis Scientia

I accidentally managed to revert your edit. I did not read your edit summary and was confused. Dont worry, I undid my edit. Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 12:11, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

@Cooldudeseven7, no worries! It happens sometimes! :) As I explained in the edit summary, I thought the list wasn't really informative and was actually more misleading than helpful. Wins Above Replacement is such a multi-layered stat that its hard make a list which is helpful. Omnis Scientia (talk) 12:23, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Do you think the page should be Speedy Deleted? Im talking about the one of where you removed the listCooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 12:36, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Umm... I don't really have an opinion on that. I was just surprised to come across the list and found it to be a copy of the list from the website. And there's a difference of opinion on which WAR formula is more accurate/better, whether defensive WAR is reliable or not, why is there a big difference between bWAR and fWAR, etc. etc. I though blanking was the best path.
I do think that speedy delete would not have gone through. There's a fanatic minority who feels strongly about it and I'm sure they are on here and will object even if they understand the reason! Omnis Scientia (talk) 12:52, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Got it. Happy editing and thank you! Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 13:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
@Cooldudeseven7, thank you for the barnstar! Much appreciated! 😊 Omnis Scientia (talk) 16:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
No problem! Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 17:03, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Hey! I just had my edit, which redid your edit reverted. It has now replaced the list on that page instead of keeping the redirect. Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 11:36, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
No worries about that. Not too surprised either. As I said, it is a notable and many people feel differently. I'll be talking it over in the Baseball WikiProject and seeing if we can improve it or not if it is going to be kept. Omnis Scientia (talk) 11:48, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Got it! Thank you! (I am going to unwatchlist that page) Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 11:54, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for all the help! :) Omnis Scientia (talk) 12:09, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
No problem! Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 12:11, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
Thank you for being such a great and loyal contributer to Wikipedia! Cooldudeseven7 (Discuss over a cup of tea?) 13:41, 2 October 2024 (UTC)

Manager templates

I reverted adding Brooklyn to the Dodgers manager templates because there were numerous other names they used early on. Including all the names in the template would look ridiculous. Yankees10 17:08, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

@Yankees10, no problem. That's fair enough! Omnis Scientia (talk) 17:17, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Jeff Passan

Hi, I have reverted this edit on Jeff Passan in which you added an unsourced birth date and birth name. Please refrain from adding unsourced BLP information in the future. Thanks. Rift (talk) 19:36, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

@Rift, alright but do add back the links (if any) which may have been removed by your revert. Best regards, Omnis Scientia (talk) 22:16, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Mike Veeck

On 14 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Mike Veeck, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Mike Veeck's baseball promotions include Disco Demolition Night, a game with no fans, and the world's largest pillow fight? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Mike Veeck. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Mike Veeck), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Complex/Rational 00:03, 14 October 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red November 2024

Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Omnis Scientia. Thank you for your work on Women's Professional Baseball League. Another editor, Bastun, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice spot for your new article. I tagged this as 'sufficient sources exist', but looking closer, I see the announcement was only made today, so all there is to go right now seems to be the original press release. There should be a lot more material available in the next few weeks.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 22:03, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Omnis_Scientia/Archive_2&oldid=1260307308"