Jump to content

User talk:Omar1976

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

License tagging for Image:Loreto Airport 100 0225.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Loreto Airport 100 0225.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:09, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Fair use image use

[edit]

As I've previously explained [1], the use of fair use images on templates is not permitted per our policy at Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria item #9. You may not use these party logos in this manner. I have, once again, remove the images from the template. I am quite happy to answer questions about this policy and its implementation, but simply reverting because you disagree with the policy is not acceptable behavior. Continued reverting may lead to your editing privileges being temporarily suspended. Thank you, --Durin 16:41, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of List of Airports in Baja California Sur, and it appears to be very similar to another wikipedia page: List of airports in Puerto Rico. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 19:19, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it and remove the tag.  :-) The bot noticed that the articles are very, very similar, but cannot be intelligent enough to see that they are also different where it counts. — Coren (talk) 20:00, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Templates in Spanish wikipedia

[edit]

Hi! I'm a Spanish wikipedia user, and I've wrote two messages in your Spanish user discussion about the posibility of removing two templates about Loreto BCS. Please, if you want to say something, go to the template discusion in the Spanish wikipedia. Thanks. Bye. --Millars 14:31, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Km 31 Poster.JPG

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Km 31 Poster.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:24, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of category from your userpage

[edit]

Hi. In enacting consensus from User categories for discussion, I have removed the category Category:Wikipedians interested in books from your userpage. It was determined in that deletion debate that this category should be depopulated of individuals, but kept as a parent category. If you wish to display a category reflecting your interest in books, please consider one of the specific sub-categories under its umbrella. Thanks, and please excuse the necessary editing of your user page! ----Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:58, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Horror Talk

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Horror Talk requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Jameson L. Tai talkcontribs 01:55, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Horror needs your help

[edit]

Omar1976 : You've received this message as you are listed as a WikiProject Horror Participant. As you may have noticed, WikiProject Horror has suffered from a lack of direction and coordination of late. A suggestion on how to improve the Project and maintain it as a viable resource has been placed up for discussion here. As a member of the Project, your voice is valued and your input is requested. Thank you, hornoir (talk) 00:02, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Horror Newsletter - February 2009

[edit]

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 02:40, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Horror Newsletter - March 2009

[edit]

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 00:22, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Horror Newsletter - April 2009

[edit]
The WikiProject Horror Newsletter
Volume I, no. 3 / April 2009
Previous issue

The Coordinator nomination has been extended!
Please go to the nomination page now to add yourself to the election for a coordinator position.
Voting will begin on May 1st.
The current Collaboration of the Month (The Texas Chain Saw Massacre) has been extended by a month!
The next collaboration will be selected on April 30th, 2009.
Please place suggestions for the next collaboration here and/or vote on current suggestions.

→ Please direct all enquiries to the WikiProject talk page.
→ This newsletter/release was delivered by ENewsBot · 05:20, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question about userbox from a new user

[edit]

Hi, If I'm reading things correctly you created a userbox that says that the user works for the federal government. I have copied it to my sandbox and modified the wording to say that this user has retired from the federal government. I have put subst: at the beginning of the template, which I think you're supposed to do. Is this allowed? I will wait to hear from you before moving it to my user page. Could you please respond on my talk page. Thanks.--Tomaterols (talk) 21:14, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Hornbook -- a new WP:Law task force for the J.D. curriculum

[edit]

Hi Omar1976,

I'm asking Wikipedians who are interested in United States legal articles to take a look at WP:Hornbook, the new "JD curriculum task force".

Our mission is to assimilate into Wikipedia all the insights of an American law school education, by reducing hornbooks to footnotes.

  • Over the course of a semester, each subpage will shift its focus to track the unfolding curriculum(s) for classes using that casebook around the country.
  • It will also feature an extensive, hyperlinked "index" or "outline" to that casebook, pointing to pages, headers, or {{anchors}} in Wikipedia (example).
  • Individual law schools can freely adapt our casebook outlines to the idiosyncratic curriculum devised by each individual professor.
  • I'm encouraging law students around the country to create local chapters of the club I'm starting at my own law school, "Student WP:Hornbook Editors". Using WP:Hornbook as our headquarters, we're hoping to create a study group so inclusive that nobody will dare not join.

What you can do now:

1. Add WP:Hornbook to your watchlist, {{User Hornbook}} to your userpage, and ~~~~ to Wikipedia:Hornbook/participants.
2. If you're a law student,
(You don't have to start the club, or even be involved in it; just help direct me to someone who might.)
3. Introduce yourself to me. Law editors on Wikipedia are a scarce commodity. Do knock on my talk page if there's an article you'd like help on.

Regards, Andrew Gradman talk/WP:Hornbook 20:00, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An exciting opportunity to get involved!

[edit]

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 03:38, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:List of environmental lawsuits#Criteria for inclusion: overinclusive?

[edit]

Your comment(s) at Talk:List of environmental lawsuits#Criteria for inclusion: overinclusive? are welcome. Wavelength (talk) 22:35, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Loreto Council Members has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 05:37, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite

[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 00:46, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Loreto Council Members 2008-2011

[edit]

Template:Loreto Council Members 2008-2011 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Raymie (tc) 23:09, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fishing chart

[edit]

Very nice fishing chart you have in the Loreto, Mexico article! -Rolypolyman (talk) 06:35, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Loreto Federal Presidential Elections has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:43, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Loreto Municipality Elections

[edit]

Template:Loreto Municipality Elections has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:45, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Loreto Fishing Seasons

[edit]

Template:Loreto Fishing Seasons has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:46, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Municipality of Loreto Political Participation has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:22, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Las Barrancas Airstrip has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As noted in the 2019 tag, fails WP:GEOFEAT and does not cite any sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alan Islas (talk) 13:10, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Miguel Ángel Alba Díaz has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Avishai11 (talk) 00:52, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Campo de Lorenzo Skypark for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Campo de Lorenzo Skypark is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campo de Lorenzo Skypark until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Allan Nonymous (talk) 23:54, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]