User talk:OldsportWiki

OldsportWiki, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Pion

What is wrong with my factual input and correcting vandalism?

I got a bit concerned that you were deleting things at random.https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Bibha_Chowdhuri&diff=991626568&oldid=991626459 OldsportWiki (talk) 04:41, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi OldsportWiki! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Good bot thanks for the Invite.OldsportWiki (talk) 17:44, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OldsportWiki (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello I have been socking I admit it I have made stocks to continue to help improve the project. I have lost my password for my original account that was blocked about 1 year ago. I really just want to improve the community I have matured since I was blocked, if you look at my sockpuppet investigation page all my socks have just been contributing to the project removing vandalism like this one. I know right now I am in a horrible position right now but I hope of me being honest of me doing the socking that I can request if I'm eligible the standard offer in six months/2nd chance. If I do not socking at all that is why I tagged the most of the arbitrators and check user team in this to prove that I'm willing to be truthful and work with the community and if the check user team doesn't accept my plea I will never go on Wikipedia again and move on.OldsportWiki (talk) 22:06, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 22:13, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If I am giving the opportunity for the Standard offer/2nd chance I will only use this account as my I do not have the password for the origin account and I will never do any more socking after the time is up @Alison @Berean Hunter @EdJohnston @Ivanvector @L235 @Materialscientist @Mz7 @Oshwah @Yamla @bradv @GorillaWarfare @Mkdw.OldsportWiki (talk) 22:06, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The standard offer is no socking for six months. You were editing today. Stay away from the project for six months from today, then we might consider your next unblock request. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 22:13, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since @Ivanvector said that my next unblock request may be construed if I wait 6 months with no socking. I'm tagging everybody again to let them know I will ask again in six months, to come back to community on this account good day everybody.@Alison @Berean Hunter @EdJohnston @L235 @Materialscientist @Mz7 @Oshwah @Yamla @bradv @GorillaWarfare @Mkdw.OldsportWiki (talk) 22:31, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No need to do so. Make an unblock request after you've gone at least six months with zero edits. Do not ping people in the meanwhile. --Yamla (talk) 22:34, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]