User talk:Old Bedan

Welcome!

Hello, Old Bedan, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 14:46, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

December 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Loaded (magazine) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Loaded (magazine) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://twitter.com/loadedmag) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:46, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Old Bedan, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Old Bedan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ryan Vesey (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Old Bedan. You have new messages at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk#Review_of_User:Old_Bedan.2Fsandbox.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

File permission problem with File:Pic, Paul Baxedale Walker (aka Chaplin).jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Pic, Paul Baxedale Walker (aka Chaplin).jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Super Mario Man 06:31, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Off The Bar.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mikeo34 (talk) 00:10, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Old Bedan. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by NtheP (talk) 20:47, 14 December 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/'Sexxx': Loaded TV Show.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mike (talk) 05:46, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sexxx:Loaded TV Show, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Dear Bedan, I created your article for you. It should not have been declined (Especially as an "unremarkable film") as it is obviously a notable TV show with good referencing, and not a "film". Find it here:Sexxx (UK TV series), Happy Editing! --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 05:06, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately

We'll it appears that Mike has now put the article up for deletion, and since he failed to warn you about it, I will do so with the warning he gave to me. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 20:24, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sexxx:Loaded TV Show for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sexxx:Loaded TV Show is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sexxx:Loaded TV Show until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mike (talk) 15:07, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Off The Bar.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! avs5221^{(talk|contrib)} 03:46, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

'The Pitch': Loaded TV show, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Pratyya ^{(have a chat?)} 04:00, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Off The Bar.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Mike (talk) 16:11, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Future articles

Hi, Old Bedan! Welcome to Wikipedia! I assume you are relatively new to the site and I thought I would give you a few pointers about television articles. I know most of your declines have been about "notability." That goes for any Wikpedia article out there — how your article is worth adding to an online encyclopedia. I always think notability goes hand-in-hand with "viewability." For example, you are trying to get the article Off The Bar approved. In its current state, that's not gonna happen.

For any article about a TV series or episode, you need major coverage from the media. This is where new series articles fail from the outset. There's just not enough coverage for them, unless they are from major networks. Loaded TV isn't one of those yet. Sexxx has been approved because there are a few sources there, but it is being debated for AfD, right now. (I have also tweaked that article.) My suggestion would be to stay on top of these current (and future) creations if you wish to have them approved, and consistently find better sources for them other than TV guides, i.e. critics' responses to the shows or technical information. Best advice: wait a month and then create them, after they have ran for a while. Bottom line: don't let the declines discourage you from future additions to Wikipedia. Have a great New Year! — ^Wylie_Coyote 10:22, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jongleurs: Loaded TV.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Bjelleklang - talk 21:06, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/'Dial M': Loaded TV Show.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Bjelleklang - talk 21:08, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 'Loaded Chart Show': Loaded TV Show

The article 'Loaded Chart Show': Loaded TV Show has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references for the show and unable to find references for the show under the name listed in the title

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 06:37, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Babedraw

'Babedraw': Loaded TV Show article has been moved to the actual title of the show, Babedraw. Suggest you find references for the article or it maybe deleted. Bgwhite (talk) 06:39, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. You don't need to designate what an article is or where it comes from in the title. For example, every Loaded TV series does not need Loaded TV in its article title. If you simply call it Babedraw (or any other series name), a message should pop up telling you that an article by that name already exists, THEN you can add a parenthetical attribution to it. And (Loaded TV show) would not be ideal. It should be (UK TV series) or something to that effect, like I did with Sexxx. — ^Wylie_Coyote 07:25, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/'Sexxx': Loaded TV Show.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! CharmlessCoin (talk) 13:51, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fash FC

Hi, there I saw you created the page Fash FC. Unless I am mistaken this is a re-run of the old Bravo shows, in which you would need to edit the page as the show was shown around 2003/2004 or somewhere around. Regards Footballgy (talk) 22:32, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Manfood

A tag has been placed on Manfood, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it does not credibly assert notability of subject per WP:GNG

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Brianhe (talk) 23:33, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 'Loaded Chick Lit': Loaded TV

A tag has been placed on 'Loaded Chick Lit': Loaded TV, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

it does not credibly assert notability of subject per WP:GNG

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Brianhe (talk) 23:33, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

I see this has been discussed on your talk page before, so the speedy deletions on these TV show articles should not come as a surprise to you. Please stop creating new articles at least until you've hashed out the ones that are under review. — Brianhe (talk) 23:38, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thanks for your message I will attend to the comments you have raised.

Many thanks.

If you want to improve these articles and need time, there is a solution that leaves them safe drom deleton. It's called Userfication. I'll do this, if you don't object. Brianhe (talk) 15:18, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Userfication proposal accepted via email. — Brianhe (talk) 16:08, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Loaded Top Five

A tag has been placed on Loaded Top Five, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Does not credibly assert notability of subject per WP:GNG

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Brianhe (talk) 00:43, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Keep It Raw

A tag has been placed on Keep It Raw, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Does not credibly assert notability of subject per WP:GNG

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Brianhe (talk) 00:46, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Babedraw

A tag has been placed on Babedraw, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Does not credibly assert notability of subject per WP:GNG

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Brianhe (talk) 00:54, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Babe IQ

A tag has been placed on Babe IQ, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Does not credibly assert notability of subject per WP:GNG

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Brianhe (talk) 00:56, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Drunk Skunk Review

A tag has been placed on Drunk Skunk Review, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Does not credibly assert notability of subject per WP:GNG

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Brianhe (talk) 00:58, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Loaded TV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to The Pitch

Paul Baxendale-Walker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Loaded

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Userfied pages

Old Bedan, the following have been userfied per our offline agreement.

Cheers. — Brianhe (talk) 16:24, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also like to send Jongleurs Live back to you for work, if you don't object. All of these articles need expansion for content and especially (this is the main deletion criterion) to establish notability. Multiple independent sources must cover the subject in a significant way, and this doesn't mean that they exist in a program guide. They have to have significant editorial coverage, as in a critical review or something like that. — Brianhe (talk) 17:21, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious affiliation

Seems pretty obvious that this user has an affiliation with Paul Baxendale-Walker — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.209.140.1 (talk) 22:17, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission 'Sexxx': Loaded TV Show

Hello Old Bedan. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled 'Sexxx': Loaded TV Show.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/'Sexxx': Loaded TV Show}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 13:06, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/'Dial M': Loaded TV Show concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/'Dial M': Loaded TV Show, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:04, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jongleurs: Loaded TV concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jongleurs: Loaded TV, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:10, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Off The Bar concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Off The Bar, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:10, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Babedraw, from its old location at User:Old Bedan/Babedraw. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 01:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Drunk Skunk Review, from its old location at User:Old Bedan/Drunk Skunk Review. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Jongleurs Live, from its old location at User:Old Bedan/Jongleurs Live. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 02:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:LTV News, from its old location at User:Old Bedan/LTV News. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 03:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Loaded Top Five, from its old location at User:Old Bedan/Loaded Top Five. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Looser Women Live, from its old location at User:Old Bedan/Looser Women Live. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Babe IQ concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Babe IQ, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Superbike Show concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Superbike Show, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:LTV News concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:LTV News, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:26, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Drunk Skunk Review concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Drunk Skunk Review, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:35, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Loaded Top Five concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Loaded Top Five, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:38, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Looser Women Live concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Looser Women Live, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Babedraw concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Babedraw, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Babe IQ

Hello, Old Bedan. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Babe IQ".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Omni Flames ^{let's talk about it} 10:48, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jongleurs Live

Hello, Old Bedan. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Jongleurs Live".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 12:35, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]