User talk:Oko21wiki21

This is Oko21wiki21's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrzej Grzybowski (July 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Novem Linguae was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Notable, h-index of 31, passes WP:PROF. I hesitate to accept this because it reads like a resume. It has a bunch of WP:UNDUE... it talks a lot about things that reliable sources such as newspapers and books speaking biographically about this person would not mention. This article should be trimmed down to the person's most important achievements, rather than listing everything like a resume does.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrzej Grzybowski and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Andrzej Grzybowski, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

–Novem Linguae (talk) 11:06, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fundacja Okulistyka 21! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! –Novem Linguae (talk) 11:06, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Andrzej Grzybowski has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Andrzej Grzybowski. Thanks! –Novem Linguae (talk) 11:10, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Andrzej Grzybowski has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Andrzej Grzybowski. Thanks! –Novem Linguae (talk) 20:15, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Andrzej Grzybowski has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Andrzej Grzybowski. Thanks! Deb (talk) 13:31, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrzej Grzybowski (September 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Scope creep was:

Removed external links from the body of the article. Remove 5 and 6 are dud.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrzej Grzybowski and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Andrzej Grzybowski, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

scope_creep^Talk 19:37, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Don't forget to hit the blue "resubmit" button

Draft:Andrzej Grzybowski. From your edit summary, sounds like you want to resubmit this but haven't yet. You may want to hit the blue "resubmit" button, and then hit "publish changes". –Novem Linguae (talk) 15:53, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrzej Grzybowski has been accepted

Andrzej Grzybowski, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 20:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The European Academy of Ophthalmology (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ts12rAc was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The European Academy of Ophthalmology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:The European Academy of Ophthalmology, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ts12rAc^{talk to me} 18:10, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The European Academy of Ophthalmology

Hello, Oko21wiki21. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The European Academy of Ophthalmology, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The European Academy of Ophthalmology

Hello, Oko21wiki21. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The European Academy of Ophthalmology".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:14, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]