Jump to content

User talk:Ogele

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]
Hello, Ogele, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Ogele, good luck, and have fun. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:36, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just posted my first contribution

[edit]

When will it be visible? Ogele (talk) 00:04, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ogele (March 20)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.
Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.
You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. -- RoySmith (talk) 23:13, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Ogele! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- RoySmith (talk) 23:13, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Have i really submitted?

[edit]

I have submitted... How can i view the submission Ogele (talk) 21:28, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dotun Popoola has been accepted

[edit]
Dotun Popoola, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:55, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

My newest article

[edit]

I hope I am doing well in my new articles? Ogele (talk) 03:17, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Lopez (August 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
You need to show references providing substantial coverage of your work from third-party independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcementss, or loval newspapers. See WP:CREATIVE for a further explanation.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 05:51, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Efe Ukala (August 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Lapablo were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Lapablo (talk) 07:14, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Efe Ukala (August 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ceethekreator was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Not much improvement made since last review. Please cite reliable sources to show how the subject is notable. Most current sources are simply announcements
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Ceethekreator (talk) 11:34, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Duly Noted

[edit]

Thanks for the quick review, submission duly noted. I will do more research on my article and work on it better.

Ogele (talk) 19:14, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:JOHN Lopez.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:JOHN Lopez.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:30, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:John Lopez

[edit]

Hi, Ogele, can I be of any help with this draft? :-) Lotje (talk) 13:00, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you can

[edit]

Yes! Lotje, assist in anyway you can. Check the draft, and the image, although i want to upload a new image now. Ogele (talk) 13:25, 11 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For privacy reasons I cannot email you directly. If you allow users to email you via Wikipedia, you need to change your preferences settins. Thank you for your comprehension. :-) Lotje (talk) 06:34, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Efe Ukala has been accepted

[edit]
Efe Ukala, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

MurielMary (talk) 21:36, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


@MurielMary: Thanks! Ogele (talk) 13:33, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Do you know about the group on Wikipedia called "Women in Red"? It's a group of editors who focus on writing new articles about notable women. You can find the group here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red All the best! MurielMary (talk) 20:56, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! I will check that out, I would be willing to join. Meanwhile, I still have another article still hanging for acceptance for a very long time now. Ogele (talk) 22:22, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What is the name of the draft? MurielMary (talk) 04:15, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Name: John Lopez

Ogele (talk) 09:00, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MurielMary: I have not heard from you on the above matter. I hope to hear from you soon. Ogele (talk) 10:40, 14 October 2019 (UTC) @MurielMary: I have not heard from you on the above matter. I hope to hear from you soon. Ogele[reply]


MY ARTICLE IS MORE THAN 8 MONTHS

[edit]

Can anyone help me out on my article https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:John_Lopez, at least give me explanation as to the reason why it has never been declined nor accepted. @MurielMary: Ogele (talk) 12:46, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@MurielMary: My article is more than 10 weeks without acceptance or approval. What should I do? Ogele (talk) 06:37, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Lopez has been accepted

[edit]
John Lopez, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 23:07, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


@Missvain: Thank you Ogele (talk) 06:38, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:Iron Star by John Lopez.jpeg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Iron Star by John Lopez.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:30, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:JOHN LOPEZ @night20191210 111622-3.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:JOHN LOPEZ @night20191210 111622-3.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:31, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:John Lopez.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of Law Firms in Nigeria with Establishment Date (July 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by M-Mustapha was:
The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Em-mustapha talk 13:39, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of Law Firms in Nigeria with Establishment Date

[edit]

Hello, Ogele. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of Law Firms in Nigeria with Establishment Date".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 18:04, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Efe Ukala for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Efe Ukala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Efe Ukala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Edge3 (talk) 17:00, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Efe Ukala moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Efe Ukala, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 09:47, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please as already implied by community consensus thanks to Edge3 who correctly initiated this AFD in September 2021, please can you be so kind as to stop recreating this non notable promotional article? Celestina007 (talk) 09:56, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Potential COI

[edit]

As is required of me, i need to discuss with you. Please can you discuss with me if you have any connections with the subject of the article? A COI isn’t necessarily a problem, but not disclosing is the problem, so thus far you aren’t in any trouble if you can openly discuss the capacity in which you are acquainted with the Draft:Efe Ukala, have you met them in person? Are you in communication with them? Are they friend or family? Can you kindly confirm any COI? Celestina007 (talk) 10:03, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Celestina007 No COI, I was in a gathering in 2019 where the name of the subject came up as having contributed to the growth of women in Nigeria and in Africa. It was a time that Wikipedia was doing some campaign for Articles about Women, it then piqued my interest to write about her. I identified a junior colleague would claimed to have been mentored by her and I obtained further information about her. I have never met the subject in person, I am not acquainted with Draft:Efe Ukala, the subject is not friend or family. I do not remember following the subject in any social media platform, I have no connection with the subject. The only interest i have is that of trying to convince Wikipedians that, I reasonably believe that she is worthy of note. There are not many Africans are doing what she is doing in Africa. Also, a gender inclusion advocate, I thought it is worthy for the world to know what she is doing to promote women in Africa. Ogele (talk) 10:30, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I had also initiated a conversation with Joe before redrating the Article, hence, it was not done in bad faith.Ogele (talk) 10:31, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Remain calm my friend, nobody here mentioned anything about bad faith. I believe this was the response from Joe Roe, right? I’m in agreement with them. It is unlikely that between September & November (barely two month interval) that the subject has passed our notability threshold, I’m saying it’s unlikely not impossible, per your response I’m going ahead to remove the COI tag, I’m going to ask you to do me a favor and show me any WP:THREE reliable sources that show this individual is indeed notable, any strong three would suffice. Celestina007 (talk) 10:44, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Celestina007 I am very calm, I am okay with us having to vet this. I just had to explain what i have done and how i have done it. I will proceed to provide the WP:THREE as requested. I appreciate your time Celestina007. Ogele (talk) 10:56, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It’s okay, to ensure I see the message, please leave me a message on my talk page with the three solid sources and I’d vet it. if it is good, I can mark as reviewed. Remember, I may not check here again for a response so please do well to remember to leave me a message on my TP(with the three sources) thank you for your time. Celestina007 (talk) 11:16, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Efe Ukala

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Ogele. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Efe Ukala, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ogele&oldid=1083159548"