User talk:O/Archive 18
No urgent messages right now. edit this message
User:O | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Main page watch Main userpage |
Talk page post | watch | archives Discussions pertaining to this user |
User contributions Block log | Logs |
Wikimedia user matrix Display all accounts on all Wikimedia wikis |
Miscellany Other user subpages |
This is an archive of past discussions about User:O. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | → | Archive 25 |
Thank you
For updating the 747 incidents category on so many pages :) Anynobody 05:46, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Mediation Cabal
Hello. I saw a request for mediation at the Mediation Cabal that has you listed as a party, and would like to mediate the case, Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-12-28 WikiProject U.S. Roads. I hope that you will allow me to mediate your dispute peacefully, and that the problem can be resolved in a satisfactory manner. Best regards, Keilana(recall) 21:44, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Sure thing. I tried to calm things down before, but it didn't work. 哦,是吗?(O-person) 21:52, 28 December 2007 (GMT)
Request for arbitration
A request for arbitration that you are a party to has been filed at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration#NE2. --Rschen7754 (T C) 03:27, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
Help requested
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Boeing_747
I'm trying to improve the article not argue with you. After discussion with SandyGeorgia, it was suggested that I contact you and see if your concerns for FA have been addressed. If so, please change your "oppose" conclusion. Fnlayson and I, as well as others, have done a lot of fixing since your comments on the FAC. Your change of heart regarding FA is essential. Thank you.
Please note that the article isn't finished with the FA. It will receive continued updates. Your thoughts are continually welcomed, at least by me. Also note that several other articles have FA stars but aren't nearly as good as the 747 article. Let's work together for FA! Archtransit (talk) 22:15, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- I'd love to. However, issues like editors favouring the aircraft project guidelines (which is not officially an MOS subset) rather than the MOS troubles it from reaching FA. That's one of my reasons why I'm still opposing. Other than that, it is pretty good, but can be expanded. I have ~4000 old newspaper articles at my disposal right now, one of which describes Lockheed proposing a 900-seat, triple-deck passenger version of the C-5 Galaxy. 哦,是吗?(O-person) 23:03, 28 December 2007 (GMT)
How about putting a comment using your own words above:
Support and Oppose it is pretty good (so support). The use of aircraft project guidelines (which is not officially an MOS subset) rather than the MOS troubles it from reaching FA (so oppose).
This way, your opinion gets heard. Otherwise, some other editors think you are putting roadblocks. This way, your opinion is more clear! Archtransit (talk) 19:35, 29 December 2007 (UTC) http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Boeing_747
- I can't support and oppose at the same time. There being some unaddressed issues still on the table, I can only oppose until they have been addressed. 哦,是吗?(O-person) 21:53, 29 December 2007 (GMT)
WikiProject St. Louis
Grey Wanderer | Talk 21:00, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Highways 2/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Highways 2/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, — Coren (talk) 22:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Happy New Year! Here is the latest edition of the WikiProject GA Newsletter! Dr. Cash (talk) 04:10, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
The Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles Newsletter | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Okay, there are a few things you didn't touch on. I'm thinking specificly of when you said it was a poorly written article. Please elaborate. - ~VNinja~ 01:17, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
- Well, the biggest focal point is that it is too short. It needs to have lots of history, ownership, etc. in prose, as the article at this point is just a bunch of lists and trivia. Hope that clears some things up. 哦,是吗?(O-person) 01:25, 28 December 2007 (GMT)
- That does help, but I found all the history I can. I went to the restaurant site, which only gave me limited information on the topic, and the offical website history. I really don't know anywhere else to look.
I guess that was my explanation of why it was short. - ~VNinja~ 21:54, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
For what?? Anyway, any other places I can look? - ~VNinja~ 22:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Awards Role Call
Closing RfA
Thank you for closing my RfA. — Cuyler91093 - Contributions 00:47, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Little query
I've been trying to figure this one out for what seems years now, and I just wanted to ask you, seen as I saw it on yours :P – how do you get GMT in your sig? Thanks in advance. Best, Rudget. 16:16, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XX - January 2008
The January 2008 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot -- 14:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
The Novels WikiProject Newsletter - Issue XX - January 2008
The Novels WikiProject Newsletter Issue XX - January 2008 | ||||||||
|
| |||||||
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
This is an automated delivery by KevinalewisBot -- 15:07, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
"you'd"
No big deal, but just thought i'd let you know about this as changes like "you'd" -> "you had" can do more harm than good --Sgt. Salt (talk) 19:40, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- The "you'd" is in a quote; anything in a quote is not modified, even taking out contractions. 哦,是吗?(O-person) 21:28, 10 January 2008 (GMT)
- You're right and somebody fixed it, but my point was that *you* made the quote change in the first place. Just pointing it out. --Sgt. Salt (talk) 22:46, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Must've been the automated peer reviewer :-$ That's how computers are dumb ;-) 哦,是吗?(O-person) 22:49, 10 January 2008 (GMT)
- But you must have skipped through the diff too quickly :-p Anyway, I tried to report the problem in the talk page, maybe the bot creator can fix it. --Sgt. Salt (talk) 23:32, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
- Must've been the automated peer reviewer :-$ That's how computers are dumb ;-) 哦,是吗?(O-person) 22:49, 10 January 2008 (GMT)
- You're right and somebody fixed it, but my point was that *you* made the quote change in the first place. Just pointing it out. --Sgt. Salt (talk) 22:46, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for your support | ||
Thank you SO MUCH for your support in my unanimous RFA. Take this cookie as a small token of my appreciation.--Jayron32|talk|contribs 05:51, 11 January 2008 (UTC) |
Signpost updated for January 2nd and 7th, 2008.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 1 | 2 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 2 | 7 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:07, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
:-)
Well golly gee, why would I ever say no to a Wikibeer? A nice alcoholic beverage always helps the day go down easy. -- NORTH talk 15:52, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
Please offer input on towns in Missouri
Some time ago, Category:Towns in Missouri was emptied on the grounds that there are no official towns in Missouri. I believe that I can prove otherwise, and I've presented my evidence on the wikiproject talk page. As a member of the Missouri Wikiproject, would you please offer your opinion? Thanks! Nyttend (talk) 23:46, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 3 | 14 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:45, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008.
Weekly Delivery |
---|
| ||
Volume 4, Issue 4 | 21 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 00:16, 24 January 2008 (UTC)