User talk:Nowy Prywaciarz

March 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Windows XP, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. That's unsourced WP:POV. That's not sourced, that's not minor, and that's not "Wording improvements" Meters (talk) 10:26, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. Stop making these unsourced claims that films or games are considered to be among the best ever. You have done this on multiple articles Meters (talk) 10:32, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I am sorry if I offended you. Did I offend you? I hope there is no hostility between us.

There are quite a few articles that proclaim these exact things without a source. Nowy Prywaciarz (talk) 16:41, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Godfather, you may be blocked from editing. Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 14:29, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Stop making improperly sourced claims about films or games being considered to be among the best ever. You were already warned about this. Meters (talk) 19:08, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see what Nowy Prywaciarz was trying to accomplish with Special:Diff/1081596850. While the edit itself was incorrect, it looks to me that it was made in good faith. However, many edits of a similar nature (especially after having warned), does give the appearance of disruptive editing. I feel that lower tiered warnings would have been more appropriate, as we do encourage editors to be bold, but not if doing so would cause disruption. Please ask for help, as there is always someone who will be glad to assist. This is how we become good editors, by learning, and discussing edits that may be called into question. You may request assistance on the specific article's Talk page (please use the New section tab at the top), or on your own Talk page by adding the {{Help me}} template between the section header and your question. Thank you for your cooperation. — CJDOS, Sheridan, OR (talk) 19:54, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Terminator 2: Judgment Day. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 16:55, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Star Wars (film). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Cnbrb (talk) 15:31, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Second Battle of El Alamein. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 17:56, 12 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ProofRobust. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Neymar seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ProofRobust 09:03, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Jaws (film). Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Claiming that people consider this to be one of the greatest films ever made, and linking to the appropriate article, rings hollow when that article doesn't mention this film. DonIago (talk) 21:01, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at North Korea, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Yue🌙 06:22, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, what? I added a space blank... Nowy Prywaciarz (talk) 15:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]