Jump to content

User talk:Nova Crystallis/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
22 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Southern District (Hong Kong) (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Add sources
22 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Eastern District (Hong Kong) (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Add sources
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Staveley Street (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Add sources
20 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Connaught Road (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Add sources
7 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Wing Sing Street (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Add sources
11 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Old Bailey Street (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Add sources
171 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Dead Man's Curve (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more sources Cleanup
74 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: B John Murrell (bandit) (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more sources Cleanup
24 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Government of Mississippi (talk) Please add more images Please add more sources Cleanup
160 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Lan Kwai Fong (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Expand
387 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Hong Kong Island (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more sources Expand
36 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Sheung Shui (talk) Please add more content Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Expand
17 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Road texture (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
1,975 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Shenzhen (talk) Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
3,364 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Mississippi River (talk) Please add more sources Unencyclopaedic
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Former Hollywood Road Police Married Quarters (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Merge
70 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Dai pai dong (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Merge
64 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Stub Traffic island (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Merge
19 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Education in Mississippi (talk) Please add more content Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Wikify
249 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Microsoft Certified Professional (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Wikify
19 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Protected intersection (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Wikify
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Anne Mallory (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
3 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: C Aris Marangopoulos (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Aert H. Kuipers (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Orphan
9 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Belcher's Street (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
9 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Morrison Hill (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Pokfield Road (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
9 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub MacDonnell Road (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Western Street (Hong Kong) (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub
38 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Civil Aviation Department (Hong Kong) (talk) Please add more content Please create proper section headings Please add more images Please add more wikilinks Please add more sources Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:41, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mississippi Highway 465

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mississippi Highway 465 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ncchild -- Ncchild (talk) 01:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup 2016 November newsletter: Final results

The final round of the 2016 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2016 WikiCup top three finalists:

In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:

  • Featured Article – Cas Liber (actually a three-way tie with themselves for two FAs in each of R2, R3, and R5).
  • Good Article – MPJ-DK had 14 GAs promoted in R3.
  • Featured List – England Calvin999 (submissions) produced 2 FLs in R2
  • Featured Pictures – Adam Cuerden restored 18 images to FP status in R4.
  • Featured Portal – Yakutsk SSTflyer (submissions) produced the only FPO of the Cup in R2.
  • Featured Topic – Connecticut Cyclonebiskit (submissions) and Calvin were each responsible for one FT in R3 and R2, respectively.
  • Good Topic – MPJ-DK created a GT with 9 GAs in R5.
  • Did You Know – MPJ-DK put 53 DYKs on the main page in R4.
  • In The News – India Dharmadhyaksha (submissions) and New York City Muboshgu (submissions), each with 5 ITN, both in R4.
  • Good Article Review – MPJ-DK completed 61 GARs in R2.

Over the course of the 2016 WikiCup the following content was added to Wikipedia (only reporting on fixed value categories): 17 Featured Articles, 183 Good Articles, 8 Featured Lists, 87 Featured Pictures, 40 In The News, and 321 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:52, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2017 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Figureskatingfan (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email)

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup

Greetings, all!

We would like to announce the start of the 4th GA Cup, a competition that seeks to encourage the reviewing of Good article nominations! Thus far, there have been three GA Cups, which were successful in reaching our goals of significantly reducing the traditionally long queue at GAN, so we're doing it again. Currently, there are over 400 nominations listed. We hope that we can again make an impact this time.

The 4th GA Cup will begin on November 1, 2016. Four rounds are currently scheduled (which will bring the competition to a close on February 28, 2017), but this may change based on participant numbers. We may take a break in December for the holidays, depending on the results of a poll of our participants taken shortly after the competition begins. The sign-up and submissions process will remain the same, as will the scoring.

Sign-ups for the upcoming competition are currently open and will close on November 14, 2016. Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors, so sign-up now!

If you have any questions, take a look at the FAQ page and/or contact one of the judges.

Cheers from 3family6, Figureskatingfan, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase. We apologize for the delay in sending out this message until after the competition has started. Thank you to Krishna Chaitanya Velaga for aiding in getting this message out.

To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, CycloneIsaac. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

New Challenge for Oceania and Australia

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

WikiCup December newsletter: WikiCup 2017

On 1 January 2017, WikiCup 2017 (the 10th Annual WikiCup) will begin. This year we are trying something a little different – monetary prizes.

For the WC2017 the prizes will be as follows (amounts are based in US$ and will be awarded in the form of an online Amazon gift certificate):

  • First place – $200
  • Second & Third place – $50 each
  • Category prizes – $25 per category (which will be limited to FA, FL, FP, GA, and DYK for 2017). Winning a category prize does not require making it to the final round.

Note: Monetary prizes are a one-year experiment for 2017 and may or may not be continued in the future. In order to be eligible to receive any of the prizes above, the competing Wikipedia account must have a valid/active email address.

After two years as a WikiCup judge, Figureskatingfan is stepping down. We thank her for her contributions as a WikiCup judge. We are pleased to announce that our newest judge is two-time WikiCup champion Cwmhiraeth.

The judges for the 2017 WikiCup are Godot13 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), and Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email).

Signups are open now and will remain open until 5 February 2017. You can sign up here.

If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send.MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mississippi Highway 612

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mississippi Highway 612 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cameron11598 -- Cameron11598 (talk) 23:41, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mississippi Highway 612

The article Mississippi Highway 612 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mississippi Highway 612 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cameron11598 -- Cameron11598 (talk) 00:02, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

March 2017 WikiCup newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. It would have been 5 points, but when a late entrant was permitted to join the contest in February, a promise was made that his inclusion would not result in the exclusion of any other competitor. To achieve this, the six entrants that had the lowest positive score of 4 points have been added to the 64 people who otherwise would have qualified. As a result, some of the groups have nine contestants rather than eight. Our top four scorers in round 1 were:

  • Scotland Cas Liber, last year's winner, led the field with two featured articles on birds and a total score of 674.
  • European Union Iry-Hor, a WikiCup newcomer, came next with a featured article, a good article and a tally of 282 bonus points for a score of 517. All these points came from the article Nyuserre Ini, an Ancient Egyptian pharaoh,
  • Japan 1989, another WikiCup newcomer, was in joint third place at 240. 1989 has claimed points for two featured lists and one good article relating to anime and comedy series, all of which were awarded bonus points.
  • South Australia Peacemaker67 shared third place with five good articles and thirteen good article reviews, mostly on naval vessels. He is also new to the competition.

The largest number of DYKs have been submitted by Vivvt and The C of E, who each claimed for seven, and MBlaze Lightning achieved eight articles at ITN. Carbrera and Peacemaker67 each claimed for five GAs and Krishna Chaitanya Velaga was well out in front for GARs, having reviewed 32. No featured pictures, featured topics or good topics yet, but we have achieved three featured articles and a splendid total of fifty good articles.

So, on to the second round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ohio State Route 364

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ohio State Route 364 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cameron11598 -- Cameron11598 (talk) 19:41, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ohio State Route 364

The article Ohio State Route 364 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ohio State Route 364 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cameron11598 -- Cameron11598 (talk) 20:41, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mississippi Highway 23

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mississippi Highway 23 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 01:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mississippi Highway 23

The article Mississippi Highway 23 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mississippi Highway 23 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 05:02, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mississippi Highway 531

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mississippi Highway 531 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Coffee -- Coffee (talk) 21:21, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mississippi Highway 531

The article Mississippi Highway 531 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mississippi Highway 531 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 22:30, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ohio State Route 703

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ohio State Route 703 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Argento Surfer -- Argento Surfer (talk) 15:21, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ohio State Route 703

The article Ohio State Route 703 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ohio State Route 703 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Argento Surfer -- Argento Surfer (talk) 19:41, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

The Center Line: Spring 2017

The Center Line
Volume 9, Issue 1 • Spring 2017 • About the Newsletter

—delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Imzadi1979 on 01:03, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

Ohio Wikimedians User Group - Invitation

Hi CycloneIsaac,

I'm Kevin, one of the founding members of the Ohio Wikimedians User Group. Created in July 2016, we're working to be a central group of Ohio Wikimedians who organize and support offline events, promote the Wikimedia movement in Ohio, build connections throughout our state, and above all, support each other. We already have a handful of members and have worked to support multiple events, including Wiki Loves Monuments in the United States and several Art+Feminism edit-a-thons at universities throughout Ohio.

I wanted to reach out to you and invite you to join the Ohio Wikimedians User Group. Being a part of the user group will allow easy communication between active Ohio editors, notifications of upcoming events in the Ohio area, and, if you're interested, the opportunity to help organize events such as edit-a-thons or workshops. Some notes:

  • All members receive a monthly newsletter with recent happenings, upcoming events, and more. Check out our April newsletter here.
  • This Thursday at 8:30 EST, we're having our first online meeting. Check out our meeting page here for more details, an agenda, and a section to sign up if you'd like to join us. Topics will include introductions and brainstorming for future projects.

Right now we have a Wikipedia Takes Columbus photo event going on, a Wiknic coming up this summer, and opportunities to attend the upcoming Ohio Private Academic Libraries Conference. If you're interested in joining us, feel free to add your name here - and feel free to reach out to me (or post on the user group's talk page) with questions or discussions. Thanks! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 07:29, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

May 2017 WikiCup newsletter

The second round of the competition has now closed, with just under 100 points being required to qualify for round 3. YellowEvan just scraped into the next round with 98 points but we have to say goodbye to the thirty or so competitors who didn't achieve this threshold; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Our top scorers in round 2 were:

  • Scotland Cas Liber, led the field with five featured articles, four on birds and one on astronomy, and a total score of 2049, half of which came from bonus points.
  • Japan 1989 was in second place with 826 points, 466 of which were bonus points. 1989 has claimed points mostly relating to anime and Japanese-related articles.
  • South Australia Peacemaker67 took third place with two FAs, one GA and seven GARs, mostly on naval vessels or military personnel, scoring 543 points.
  • Other contestants who scored over 400 points were Freikorp, Carbrera, and Czar. Of course all these points are now wiped out and the 32 remaining contestants start again from zero in round 3.

Vivvt submitted the largest number of DYKs (30), and MBlaze Lightning achieved 13 articles at ITN. Carbrera claimed for 11 GAs and Argento Surfer performed the most GARs, having reviewed 11. So far we have achieved 38 featured articles and a splendid 132 good articles. Commendably, 279 GARs have been achieved so far, more than double the number of GAs.

So, on to the third round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Typhoon Wendy (1960)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Typhoon Wendy (1960) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Yellow Evan -- Yellow Evan (talk) 05:21, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Typhoon Wendy (1960)

The article Typhoon Wendy (1960) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Typhoon Wendy (1960) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Yellow Evan -- Yellow Evan (talk) 22:42, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Missouri Route 75

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Missouri Route 75 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 02:00, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Missouri Route 75

The article Missouri Route 75 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Missouri Route 75 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 07:40, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Arkansas Highway 142

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Arkansas Highway 142 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 03:01, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Missouri Route 75

The article Missouri Route 75 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Missouri Route 75 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 06:41, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Arkansas Highway 142

The article Arkansas Highway 142 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Arkansas Highway 142 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 07:21, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 July newsletter

The third round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 288 points being required to qualify for round 4. It was a hotly competitive round with all but four of the contestants exceeding the 106 points that was necessary to proceed to round 4 last year. Coemgenus and Freikorp tied on 288, and both have been allowed to proceed, so round 4 now has one pool of eight competitors and one of nine.

Round 3 saw the achievement of a 26-topic Featured topic by MPJ-DK as well as 5 featured lists and 13 featured articles. PanagiotisZois and SounderBruce achieved their first ever featured articles. Carbrera led the GA score with 10, Tachs achieved 17 DYKs and MBlaze Lightning 10 In the news items. There were 167 DYKs, 93 GARs and 82 GAs overall, this last figure being higher than the number of GAs in round 2, when twice as many people were taking part. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 4, we say goodbye to the fifteen or so competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 05:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

RfA

Thanks for supporting my run for administrator. I am honored and grateful. ) Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:14, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

I-55 in Louisiana

Thanks for passing my first good article! Britinvasion64 (talk) 14:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 September newsletter

Round 4 of the WikiCup has ended and we move forward into the final round. In round 4, a total of 12 FAs, 3 FLs, 44 GAs, 3 FLs, 79 DYKs, 1 ITN and 42 GARs was achieved, with no FPs or FTs this time. Congratulations to Peacemaker67 on the Royal Yugoslav Navy Good Topic of 36 items, and the 12 featured articles achieved by Cas Liber (5), Vanamonde93 (3), Peacemaker67 (2), Adityavagarwal (1) and 12george1 (1). With a FA scoring 200 points, and bonus points available on top of this, FAs are likely to feature heavily in the final round. Meanwhile Yellow Evan, a typhoon specialist, was contributing 12 DYKs and 10 GAs, while Adityavagarwal and Freikorp topped the GAR list with 8 reviews each. As we enter the final round, we are down to eight contestants, and we would like to thank those of you who have been eliminated for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. The lowest score needed to reach round 5 was 305, and I think we can expect a highly competitive final round.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best man (or woman) win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 06:26, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mississippi Highway 53

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mississippi Highway 53 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 01:01, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mississippi Highway 53

The article Mississippi Highway 53 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mississippi Highway 53 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 02:41, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 November newsletter: Final results

The final round of the 2017 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2017 WikiCup top three finalists:

In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:

  • Featured Article – Cas Liber (actually a two-way tie with themselves for an astonishing five FAs in R2 and R4).
  • Good Article – Adityavagarwal had 14 GAs promoted in R5.
  • Featured List – Canada Bloom6132 (submissions) and Japan 1989 (submissions) both produced 2 FLs in R2
  • Featured Pictures – Cascadia SounderBruce (submissions) improved an image to FP status in R5, the only FP this year.
  • Featured Topic – Denmark MPJ-DK (submissions) has the only FT of the Cup in R3.
  • Good Topic – Four different editors created a GT in R2, R3 and R4.
  • Did You Know – Adityavagarwal had 22 DYKs on the main page in R5.
  • In The News – India MBlaze Lightning (submissions) had 14 ITN on the main page in R2.
  • Good Article Review – India Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (submissions) completed 31 GARs in R1.

Over the course of the 2017 WikiCup the following content was added or improved on Wikipedia: 51 Featured Articles, 292 Good Articles, 18 Featured Lists, 1 Featured Picture, 1 Featured Topics, 4 Good Topics, around 400 Did You Knows, 75 In The News, and 442 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.

Regarding the prize vouchers - @Adityavagarwal, Vanamonde93, Casliber, Bloom6132, 1989, and SounderBruce: please send Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) an email from the email address to which you would like your Amazon voucher sent. Please include your preference of global Amazon marketplace as well. We hope to have the electronic gift cards processed and sent within a week.

We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2018 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email), and Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mississippi Highway 53

The article Mississippi Highway 53 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mississippi Highway 53 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 03:41, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018

So the 2017 WikiCup has come to an end. Congratulations to the winner, to the other finalists and to all those who took part. 177 contestants signed up, more than usual, but not all of them submitted entries in the first round. Were editors attracted by the cash prizes offered for the first time this year, or were these irrelevant? Do the rules and scoring need changing for the 2018 WikiCup? If you have a view on these or other matters, why not join in the WikiCup discussion about next year's contest? Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs · email), Godot13 (talk · contribs · email) and Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs · email). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, CycloneIsaac. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Hi

Hello, I would like to ask your help, the page "Draft:Israel lucas gois monteiro" is already some time stopped, I would like to ask your help to move the page and leave it available here in Wikipedia, the article is very well edited, could you help me? Brbolt2 (talk) 05:33, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

&mdash;[[User:CycloneIsaac|<font face="Segoe UI" color="#5C5C33">CycloneIsaac</font>]] ([[User talk:CycloneIsaac|<font face="Segoe UI" color="#5C5C33">Talk</font>]]) : —CycloneIsaac (Talk)

to

&mdash;[[User:CycloneIsaac|<span style="font-family: Segoe UI; color: #5C5C33">CycloneIsaac</span>]] ([[User talk:CycloneIsaac|<span style="font-family: Segoe UI; color: #5C5C33">Talk</span>]]) : —CycloneIsaac (Talk)

Anomalocaris (talk) 16:56, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

k.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 01:51, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Thanks! —Anomalocaris (talk) 02:39, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Missouri Route 164

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Missouri Route 164 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 03:20, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Missouri Route 162

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Missouri Route 162 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 03:40, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Missouri Route 164

The article Missouri Route 164 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Missouri Route 164 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 03:40, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Missouri Route 162

The article Missouri Route 162 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Missouri Route 162 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 04:00, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Missouri Route 164

The article Missouri Route 164 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Missouri Route 164 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 21:02, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Missouri Route 162

The article Missouri Route 162 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Missouri Route 162 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ed! -- Ed! (talk) 21:02, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Missouri Route 48

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Missouri Route 48 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 07:20, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kentucky Route 1508

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kentucky Route 1508 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vermont -- Vermont (talk) 01:21, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kentucky Route 1508

The article Kentucky Route 1508 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kentucky Route 1508 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vermont -- Vermont (talk) 02:01, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Ma On Shan Bypass

Hello, CycloneIsaac. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ma On Shan Bypass".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 23:22, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

Merciful failure

It pains me to say it, but you were right to fail Taconic State Parkway.

Years ago, after I had finished expanding it and writing most of the route description section, I mentioned to a friend of mine more involved in the roads projects than myself that, after an encouraging peer review, GA might not be far off. I was told that the people in the roads projects were far from satisfied with the state of the interchange table, and some people thought there was more detail than necessary in the history section. So, I decided to put those plans off.

When it was nominated I realized that a lot more work would be necessary, as you seem to have. I'm busy with other things at the moment and really didn't want to have to interrupt them and bring the TSP article back up to code (One major problem is that New York's Historic Preservation Office has migrated the NRHP applications to a newer site that does not assign them static URLs, so checking the current links against the source is no longer possible. And that NRHP application was a major source. I suppose I/we will have to go back to using the link to the slightly less well-digitized version at the NPS site).

BTW, you left the article with a "close paraphrasing" tag. Were there any sections in particular that led to this? I generally try to avoid this, but it was a long time ago and as I said above I couldn't check the text against the sources (And other sections have been added since then, by other editors). Daniel Case (talk) 02:33, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

@Daniel Case: The copyvio detector went off on the article when going through the GA toolbox. Yeah, I'm not sure why the nominator nominated the article to begin with. I know it's one of his goals, but it was far from being a Good Article.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 02:40, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Hah! I think for once the copyvio may be on the other site's end. Johnlearn.com seems to be some site that sort of machine-reedits our articles ... I couldn't learn anything about it there. Daniel Case (talk) 02:50, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
CycloneIsaac, I took a look at the Earwig report on this article, and I don't see any basis for the close paraphrasing template you added to it. If you're going to be using Earwig, you need to know how to interpret its results. A number of 80% means nothing in and of itself, and should never have been cited as part of a GA review; examples of actual copying are what is needed. Just reading the johnlearn.com and smjohn.com text should have made you suspicious, because neither makes any sense: it's just phrases strung together, and both are dated late 2017, meaning that they were almost certainly strung together while copying from the Wikipedia article. (The problem here is that these sites should never have been used as sources because of their incoherence, which points to other problems in the article.) The geocaching.com site goes back to 2012, but that paragraph in the lede goes back further; in this case, a Wikipedia copy is being used as a source to cite extant text, which is a verification problem but not a close paraphrasing one. The two nytimes.com entries are simply the article quoting the newspaper, perfectly valid, and there's nothing to the next two sources. If you don't have any more evidence than Earwig, I'll be pulling the template as unwarranted. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:40, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
@BlueMoonset: Took down the template.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 05:44, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:57, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Missouri Route 101

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Missouri Route 101 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vermont -- Vermont (talk) 11:01, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Missouri Route 101

The article Missouri Route 101 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Missouri Route 101 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vermont -- Vermont (talk) 23:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018 March newsletter

And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. With 53 contestants qualifying, the groups for round 2 are slightly smaller than usual, with the two leaders from each group due to qualify for round 3 as well as the top sixteen remaining users.

Our top scorers in round 1 were:

  • United States Aoba47 led the field with a featured article, 8 good articles and 42 GARs, giving a total of 666 points.
  • Germany FrB.TG , a WikiCup newcomer, came next with 600 points, gained from a featured article and masses of bonus points.
  • India Ssven2, another WikiCup newcomer, was in third place with 403 points, garnered from a featured article, a featured list, a good article and twelve GARs.
  • United States Ceranthor, India Numerounovedant, Minnesota Carbrera, Netherlands Farang Rak Tham and Romania Cartoon network freak all had over 200 points, but like all the other contestants, now have to start again from scratch. A good achievement was the 193 GARs performed by WikiCup contestants, comparing very favourably with the 54 GAs they achieved.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13 (talk), Sturmvogel 66 (talk), Cwmhiraeth (talk) and Vanamonde (talk) 15:27, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Missouri Route 48

The article Missouri Route 48 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Missouri Route 48 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kees08 -- Kees08 (talk) 19:41, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Missouri Route 48

On 10 March 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Missouri Route 48, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that there is an eight-sided barn on Missouri Route 48? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Missouri Route 48. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Missouri Route 48), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:12, 10 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for helping to promote Tropical Storm Selma (2017) to good article standards! I really appreciate your help. Thank you! Cooper 19:47, 18 April 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Typhoon Charlotte (1959)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Typhoon Charlotte (1959) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 22:41, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Typhoon Charlotte (1959)

The article Typhoon Charlotte (1959) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Typhoon Charlotte (1959) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 00:21, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Typhoon Hester (1952)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Typhoon Hester (1952) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 16:41, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Typhoon Hester (1952)

The article Typhoon Hester (1952) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Typhoon Hester (1952) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 17:01, 24 April 2018 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Typhoon Hester (1952)

The article Typhoon Hester (1952) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Typhoon Hester (1952) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Courcelles -- Courcelles (talk) 21:41, 24 April 2018 (UTC)