Talk:Mississippi Highway 612

Mississippi Highway 612 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 4, 2017. (Reviewed version).

U.S. Roads: State highways / Mississippi Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	Mississippi
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mississippi Highway 612/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cameron11598 (talk · contribs) 23:40, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Will start shortly --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 23:40, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Good work just a few minor things to correct.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
See comments
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
are there any images available that would improve the article?
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
Good luck improving the article!

Comments

The start of the route description section could be worded better to make the topic clearer.
"At Red Creek Church Road, MS 612 travels southeast and into a larger forest"
- Not sure you need the "and"
"small forest" "larger forest" (in the route description section)
- Which forests?
History Section
- MS 612 was established in 1966, and it was part of a construction project in 1967, with a total cost of $611,248
  - Almost seems like a run-on sentence could probably be separated for better flow.
- The route has not been changed significantly since.[9][10]
  - Sentence Fragment

--Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 00:05, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed all of them I think. The forest doesn't have a name. It's just a group of trees.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 23:52, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good! --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 23:54, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]