User talk:NorwichFan2016

November 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ipswich Town F.C. has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ipswich Town F.C. was changed by NorwichFan2016 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95441 on 2016-11-27T16:45:54+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:45, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ipswich. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ipswich was changed by NorwichFan2016 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.862605 on 2016-11-27T16:49:05+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:49, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ipswich, you may be blocked from editing. Exemplo347 (talk) 18:21, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Exemplo347. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Exemplo347 (talk) 18:30, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NorwichFan2016 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have NEVER used any other account in my life to edit Wikipedia. NorwichFan2016 (talk) 19:49, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This account is being used exclusively for vandalism ([1][2][3]) and for harrasing other editors ([4][5][6]). Vanjagenije (talk) 22:33, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What do you know of DENY and the sockpuppeteer template? And do you have any positive contributions to make? -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 20:00, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have read deny the sockpuppeteer template help page. Apart from that I also wish to make positive contributions to fight vandalism and improve football articles by updating them with the latest information as and when it becomes available. NorwichFan2016 (talk) 20:20, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access and mail revoked WP:NOTHERE, besides the socking. Not a single edit by this account was anything other than blatant vandalism or vile personal attacks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:54, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]