Jump to content

User talk:Nok162

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to History of China, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Brian0324 (talk) 17:37, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Puppet has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Lunchscale Talk! Contrib! 17:43, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Puppet constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. LeaveSleaves talk 17:54, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Puppet. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Schumi555 (talk) 17:57, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Modern warfare 2 pc, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. -- Flyguy649 talk 19:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to List of mountain ranges . Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Flyguy649 talk 19:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Modern warfare2(pc)

[edit]

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Modern warfare2(pc). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. MuffledThud (talk) 19:38, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Modern_warefare_cheats has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:NOTGUIDE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Airplaneman talk 19:59, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Fuego, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Fuego was changed by Nok162 (u) (t) blanking the page on 2010-03-05T20:21:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:21, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Ural Mountains. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ural Mountains was changed by Nok162 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2010-03-06T20:09:35+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:09, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Cobi. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. tetraedycal, tetraedycal 20:15, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Ural Mountains. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. RobertMfromLI | User Talk 21:14, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you delete or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Fuego, you will be blocked from editing. RobertMfromLI | User Talk 21:15, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to HI, you will be blocked from editing. RobertMfromLI | User Talk 21:16, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ABSOLUTE final warning

[edit]

This is the final warning you are receiving regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ChaosControl1994 (talk) 21:24, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|ohh my god I am sooooooooo sorry this is my school acount and my brother figured out the password I am sooooooo sorry I will make a new one so that my brother doesnt vandalize anymore and he is in big trouble again I am soooooo sorry plz forgive me.}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Abecedare (talk) 21:33, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Your disruptive comments and threats are not appreciated.
A personal attack as you did at User talk:Nok162, will not convince anyone to un-block you (and in this case, may be a violation of various laws). Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. RobertMfromLI | User Talk 18:25, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nok162 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

ohh my god I am sooooooooo sorry this is my school acount and my brother figured out the password I am sooooooo sorry I will make a new one so that my brother doesnt vandalize anymore and he is in big trouble again I am soooooo sorry plz forgive me.

Decline reason:

Compromised accounts are blocked indefinitely. Plus, your very first edit from 2008 is vandalism, so that excuse doesn't fly at all. Please don't insult our intelligence.Fuck your inteligence Hersfold (t/a/c) 23:31, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


NoK162 put response in wrong section. Their response is: "I dont care what you say you can tell me not to get another account but I will and you guys wont get vandalism. Plus who cares if my first post was vandalism alot of people do that and who cares."

See Revision History (18:36:39 EST): http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nok162&curid=17162698&diff=348422424&oldid=348421590

Best, RobertMfromLI | User Talk 23:56, 7 March 2010 (UTC) Fuck you wikipedia fuck you all you sons of the bitches you cock suckers you hors you are going to get fucked if you erase me I swear I know where you live and I will come and kill you you hear me ass holes try to fuck with me bitch!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 you guys can put me back on or die I am a trained mercanery[reply]