User talk:NinjaRya
Blocked
[edit]I have blocked you indefinitely because you don't seem to have anything positive to contribute to the encyclopedia, other than disruption, edit warring, rudeness, belligerent and uncollaborative conduct. If you want to be unblocked you're going to have to convince us you can be trusted to completely change your behavior and how you edit here, because what you've been doing thus far is not welcome or acceptable according to our rules here. Swarm we ♥ our hive 06:36, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
I Demand TO BE UNBLOCKED! THOSE GUYS ACCUSED ME OF DOING EVERYTHING WRONG!
I DEMAND TO BE UNBLOCKED!
[edit]Users: Cyphoidbomb, Bilorv, and Superhamster, have accused me of doing wrong things. These guys are THE BULLIES and cyberbullied me! All 3 have done nothing but follow me around and stalk me by undoing my edits and trying to get into a fight with me! Also, I was doing constructive edits, while these guys think they know everything and they are Know It Alls! Not only that by another user by the name of KratatoaKatie has also blocked my good buddy Matey488, for no apparent reason! Also, I'm sick of users on wikipedia getting blocked just because they "DON'T EDIT RIGHT" or "NOT HERE TO CONTRIBUTE". Most people try to get rid of users like they are the plague or an illness and that's not a fair way to treat users! And Finally, people who edit 247, GET A LIFE, stop using the internet all day and go outside, read a book, play video games, or watch TV, because your not gonna be on the internet or wikipedia forever, and if anybody gets onto the noticeboard they should be able to defend themselves against other users accusing them!
- It is extraordinarily disrespectful to actual victims of cyberbullying to carelessly toss around an accusation like that. You added false information to Wikipedia. Calling you out on that is not bullying, it's a request that you demonstrate integrity. You were engaged in edit warring, article WP:OWNERSHIP and adding walls of data to an already bloated template. Asking you to stop these things isn't bullying. If you want to request (i.e. not demand) to be unblocked, you need to use this template: {{unblock | reason=your reason here ~~~~}}. However, based on your comments above, it's not clear that you even know why you were blocked, or that you are capable of playing nicely in the sandbox with the other children, or that you are even serious about contributing here. Comments like
I'm sick of uses on wikipedia getting blocked just because they ... [are] "NOT HERE TO CONTRIBUTE"
sound an awful lot like someone who intends to be disruptive. Really, you don't think that people should be blocked if they are not here to contribute? Lastly, you should have responded at the edit warring noticeboard instead of deleting the complaint. That also demonstrates problems with integrity. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:16, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Cyphoidbomb: YES I BELIEVE USERS SHOULD GET A FAIR TRIAL! AND SHOULDN'T BE BLOCKED, IT'S A FREE COUNTRY! Also, U and the users I have Mentioned are Nuts! I take it that you don't go outside that often! Like I said GET A LIFE! How old are U anyway? Um, Calling someone out is bullying! And like I said talk to Rymax and MrLinkinPark about the issue, not just follow around users around and give them a long ass speech.
Also, Bilorv, WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU DOING ON WIKIPEDIA ANYWAY?! YOU ONLY 15-16 YEARS OLD AND JUST A KID!
- Yes, I am just a kid, but my age is irrelevant here; I believe my conduct has been a lot more polite and respectful than yours. I neither know nor care what your age is and would not judge you based on anything other than the way you behave, which has been very poorly. As for what the hell I am doing on Wikipedia, well I'm trying to contribute to the sum of all human knowledge — my contributions may be humble and small-scale when compared to the inordinate work some people put into this encyclopedia but I hope I'm still doing some good.
- You would do well to stop telling people to "GET A LIFE", because they are entitled to choose how they spend their time without being pestered by others. "IT'S A FREE COUNTRY" (while not true on a global site anyway) is not a valid reason to unblock you; administrators can and do block people who aren't here with the project's best interests. You're not entitled to make changes on pages owned by a private organisation, the Wikimedia Foundation. — Bilorv(talk)(c)(e) 17:33, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
FUCK YOU GUYS! Bilov, you only got an account because you wanted to edit like the rest of us! I have been editing for about 4 years with out without an account! BTW I'm older than you so that makes me so much smarter! Also, I'm not afraid to fight anyone of you guys in real life or we can settle it in any video game! It is a free country! But I'm right that YOU CANT SPEND ALL DAY ON THE INTERNET AND PEOPLE SHOULD GET A LIFE BECAUSE WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU GONNA DO IN A COUPLE YEARS ESPECIALLY IN ADULT LIFE!
July 2015
[edit]
(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.