User talk:Niemandsbucht

October 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Kampfgruppe gegen Unmenschlichkeit, you may be blocked from editing. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:16, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is no disruptive editing. The changes can be substantiated easily by sources. Niemandsbucht 10:52, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how it works. If you have such sources then provide them. -- Jibal (talk) 04:41, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As you can see here, I have provided a source. What's your point, Jibal? Niemandsbucht (talk) 20:50, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jibal and I are both glad you added a source for your assertions, as this prior edit you gave no source. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:54, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Jibal and Chris Troutman: My prior edit cited from a source that was already given and referenced in the article, namely the article by Thomas Boghardt. Now it is mentioned twice. Unnecessary and not really according to academic style, but typical for WP ;-) Niemandsbucht (talk) 08:19, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

FDW777 (talk) 21:59, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FDW777, you have posted an official standard message that refers to you or "any other editor". Please, tell me more about your editorial role. What function do you have in the WP community? Thanks. Niemandsbucht (talk) 08:42, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi FDW777, you have not responded to my question. Before I engage in further discussion, I would like to know your editorial role. I also would like to know if you currently act as paid editor in any function. Your editing in the artcile where I edited in October 2022 appears to be rather one-sided. Thank you for an answer. Niemandsbucht (talk) 13:24, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Niemandsbucht, I've received similar notices on my talk page, and I've been told that 1) anybody can put them on your page for any reason 2) it's not a warning or an indication that you did anything "wrong". It's just a generic notice that some people seem to enjoy putting up on other folks' talk pages. Philomathes2357 (talk) 22:27, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Philomathes2357. This is a very benign explanation! I think user FDW777 has content related reasons to put up this notice on my talk page. It is not only (or not at all) about WP rules. Niemandsbucht (talk) 13:48, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

True. Some people like to slap these up on the talk pages of editors with whom they disagree. It's a weird way to try to 'dunk' on someone or 'check' them. Of course, it's completely devoid of meaning, so it's a waste of the editor's time. Philomathes2357 (talk) 14:18, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Philomathes2357 What in the world do you mean by "it's devoid of meaning"? And both of you are not showing good faith. Doug Weller talk 10:05, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DougWeller: This is not about my "faith" or any other editor's "faith". This is about the fact that the article is biased. I repeat: it reads like a hit piece. Glenn Greenwald commented on the topic a few weeks ago (from min. 55:30 onwards). Niemandsbucht (talk) 19:43, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, my comment is about your post above about another editor. Doug Weller talk 20:53, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The notice was put up here by FDW777 after I made only three edits on the talk page of the article "John Campbell". My edits were meant to help improve the article and pointed out specific shortcomings. They were pointed out by other editors as well but to no avail. The article continues to read like a hit piece. Even if it now mentions a few positive things about John Campbell, it still tries hard to obscure the fact that Campbell has medical expertise by training and practice. And it still includes the standard slurs of "misinformation" and "antivax". In any case, DW777 did not reply and this indicated that there were content related issues. Niemandsbucht (talk) 13:18, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Grayzone - Max Blumenthal quote source?

Hi there. You dropped a quote from Max Blumenthal in the talk page of The Grayzone. Could you please provide a link to a citation for that quote? If you're able to do so, I can find a way to incorporate it into the article. Thanks. Philomathes2357 (talk) 22:23, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. I will explain the matter on the talk page of The Grayzone. Niemandsbucht (talk) 13:42, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen your comment and found the source of the quote. Thanks. Philomathes2357 (talk) 14:19, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]