User talk:Nickoala27

May 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Laurențiu Reghecampf has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Laurențiu Reghecampf was changed by Nickoala27 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.887286 on 2018-05-18T18:17:37+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:17, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gabriel Tamaș. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Gabriel Tamaș was changed by Nickoala27 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.906275 on 2018-05-18T21:38:08+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:38, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Constantin Budescu, you may be blocked from editing. Giant Snowman 10:10, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nickoala27, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Nickoala27! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

FCSB

Te rog sa te opresti in a folosi numele FCSB. Articolul se numeste FC Steaua Bucuresti, asa e cunoscuta in engleza.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 09:18, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Respectați deciziile judecătorești !!!

Nu este adevărat, încetați să mai creați confuzii. Nu exista 2 echipe cu același nume, indiferent de liga sau tara. Aceasta echipă se numește în acte Football Club FCSB SA. Steaua București joacă în liga a 4a, are palmares, sigla , suporteri(Peluza Sud Steaua). Cupa Campionilor Europeni este la echipa din liga a 4a ( urmărește rezumatul din meciul dintre Academia Rapid și Steaua București), și o să vezi că toate cupele câștigate în 1986 erau la marginea terenului. Cum poți să spui că FCSB a câștigat Cupa Campionilor sau că "marile" vedete: Alibec,Budescu,Nedelcu joacă la Steaua București.

VRETI SAU NU ASTA ESTE REALITATEA !!!

Nickoala27 (talk) 09:48, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Baiete, stai chill. Daca citesti cu atentie deciziile judecatoresti pe care le iei dumneata in considerare o sa vezi ca nu scrie nicaieri ca CSA Steaua a castigat palmaresul. A castigat doar BRANDUL Steaua, adica nume si culori. Sunt petrolist si nu am o simpatie pentru FCSB-isti (ba din contra), dar pana nu castiga CSA palmaresul in instanta, FCSB-ul are 26 de titluri. Si nici in instanta asta romaneasca nu am incredere, palmaresul este la CS U dar la UEFA au trofee 0.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 22:37, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

continuare

Pai și atunci de ce tot corectează din FCSB in Steaua când echipa lui Becali a pierdut acest nume. Chiar astăzi a spus, că FCSB nu poate fi exclusă din campionat și din Europa și că clubul lui se numește FCSB și nu are nici-o legătură cu Steaua București Nickoala27 (talk) 15:10, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nu mai pune CSA in loc de FC la gloriile Stelei! De ce? Simplu, pentru ca momentan nu exista o decizie impotriva palmaresului FCSB (care este complet). Faci un mare rau pentru ca mai apoi poate trebuie tot recorectat. Wikipedia nu e loc de batjocura. Asteapta rezultatul final al procesului, iar daca palmaresul merge la CSA atunci aia au jucat pentru CSA si nu pentru FCSB. Numai complici lucrurile si futi Wikipedia englezeasca. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.120.205.62 (talk) 07:44, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sunt de acord. Si merg mai departe si spun sa lasi “Steaua Bucuresti” si la cei care au jucat in ultimul an la FCSB. Englezii nu vor sa schimba numele echipei fiindca asa e cunoscuta in media internationala, ii doare undeva de deciziile judecatoresti care oricum nu i-au luat palmaresul FCSB-ului.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 08:18, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Si vezi ca SineBot ala cu care vorbesti e un robot nu un om, tie ti-a dat mesaj alt user :)))

Steaua care nu mai exista ( pentru englezii)

Englezii ar trebui să înțeleagă că în România se întâmplă multe lucruri mai mult sau mai puțin curate. Ok, am înțeles problema cu palmaresul dar NUMELE (Steaua) nu mai exista. Echipa a pierdut definitiv marca și numele Steaua, poate aud și englezii . Nickoala27 (talk) 08:38, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bai frate

Termina cu edit-urile pe pagina Craiovei. Echipa e cunoscuta si ca CS U Craiova in media romaneasca si straina, nu numai U Craiova. Editezi ca sa te afli in treaba. Si vezi ca trebuie sa raspunzi la mine pe talk page, nu tot aici cum ai facut mai sus.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 16:41, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

N-am nicio treaba cu FC U, consider CS U (da, CS U, nu doar U) echipa adevarata a Craiovei. Ideea e ca suntem pe Wikipedia, schimbarile dureaza ceva timp sa se intample. De asta englezii inca folosesc Steaua in loc de FCSB, de asta Craiova e si CS U, nu numai U.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 19:12, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Este o rivalitate transformata in ura, dar daca e sa vorbesc despre mine, sunt impartial. Daca nu as fi fost, editam doar la Petrolul si nu ma mai interesa altceva. Aproape toata introducerea de la CS Universitatea Craiova este scrisa de mine. La fel am scris si la FC U, incerc sa fac sa fie totul clar, mai ales pentru straini, ca noi deja stim cum e treaba. CS U vine de la vechea denumire a clubului, si prescurtarea asta e inca folosita de Digi, ProSport, Telekom (ca despre media e vorba, nu ce credem noi) ca sa se deosebeasca de FC U. Eu zic ca ordinea este asa: (1) Universitatea Craiova - numele complet (2) CS U Craiova - numele prin care se deosebeste de cealalta echipa si (3) U Craiova - cea mai ambigua denumire. La short name in infobox le pastram pe amandoua, nu trebuie sa fie neaparat doar una. Si la FC Steaua Bucuresti e Steaua, FCSB. Daca vrei putem sa il intrebam si User:Rhinen ce parere are. Iti iau in considerare opinia, ca nu sunt Dumnezeu sa fac doar ce vreau, dar eu consider ca varianta propusa de mine este mai buna.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 20:02, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apreciez ca putem sa discutam civilizat, mai inainte iti dadeam revert la edit-uri si tu continuai sa modifici. Asa putem sa ne punem de acord. Din ce am vazut eu cel mai mult foloseste noua denumire (U Craiova) DigiSport-ul, dar si lor le mai scapa cate un CS U. La ProSport e juma-juma, la celelalte site-uri nu prea ma uit constant ca sa fac un sondaj. Asa cum scrie si Rhinen mai jos, problema e ca U Craiova e si numele societatii lui Mititelu, si CS U cu FC U erau niste prescurtari foarte ok ca sa poti sa le deosebesti.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 20:47, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox dates

Hi, when updating infobox stats you should update the |club-update= or |pcupdate= parameter for club stats, or the |nationalteam-update= or |ntupdate= parameter for international stats, by adding five tildes (~~~~~), which generates the specific time the update was made. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 23:42, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nickoala27. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tucudean

Echipa se numea FC STEAUA BUCURESTI in 2016. Sunt complet de acord sa scrie acum FCSB la jucatorii actuali, dar atunci era STEAUA. Fii obiectiv naibii.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 23:18, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ai recunoscut chiar tu. "A putut sa se lungeasca". S-a lungit pana in martie 2017, atunci s-a schimbat oficial numele. Sigla o schimbasera mai devreme, acolo ai dreptate, dar eu vorbesc despre nume. Nu despre sigla, nu despre palmares, nu despre Becali. Deci te rog sa lasi "Steaua București" la jucatorii care au fost inainte de 2017 la FCSB.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 23:59, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Marian Vlada

Thanks for creating Marian Vlada.

A New Page Patroller Onel5969 just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Please take a look at WP:CIT and WP:CITE on how to format footnotes and citations.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:04, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Florentin Matei

Pot sa stiu ce problema mai ai acum? E aceeasi echipa FCSB cu Steaua din 2011. Doar fiindca si-a schimbat numele nu inseamna ca e o echipa noua. De la 2003 in spate te inteleg sa comentezi ceva, dar asta chiar e aceeasi entitate. Am mai discutat despre asta si devii enervant.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 21:34, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ba este foarte ok. Cand a fost junior a jucat la FC Steaua Bucuresti. Cand a jucat in Liga I a jucat la FC Steaua Bucuresti. Nu ma intereseaza cum se numeste echipa acum. Trebuie sa punem in articol numele echipei de atunci, nu cum se numeste acum. Ca asa poti sa treci si la primii jucatori din 1947 Steaua in loc de ASA Bucuresti de exemplu. Crede-ma ca sunt destul de impartial, am votat de fiecare data pentru schimbarea numelui articolului din FC Steaua Bucuresti in FCSB.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 19:15, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mi se parea important sa mentionam faptul ca echipa si-a schimbat numele si in intro. Strainii probabil inca o stiu ca Steaua, si poate se gandesc "cum sa se intoarca la FCSB daca a jucat la Steaua? Cine e FCSB?". Dar ai dreptate, cred ca putem sa lasam asa ca sa fie mai pe scurt.8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 22:54, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at FCSB, you may be blocked from editing. Matthew hk (talk) 18:10, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CSU Dunărea de Jos Galați moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, CSU Dunărea de Jos Galați, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:13, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Opreste-te

Inceteaza cu editarile la FCSB Steaua. Pentru ca Decizia ICCJ nu este definitiva. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.15.81.135 (talk) 11:14, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I really told him the same! He must stop from this until the Curtea Apel decision and in association necessarly with FRF / LPF officially stating the record goes to CSA Steaua. Also he doesn't understand nicknames are not official names and can be used even after a decision against the trophies. Parca vorbesc cu peretii, Nickolae!

Yellow-sulphur-rose (talk) 22:55, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pe mine nu ma intereseaza sa manipulez adevarul ca pe tine, ci sa redau adevarul atunci cand se decide. Toata lumea iti spune asta si nu intelegi? Nu mai poti astepta putin? Daca palmaresul merge catre CSA, am putea scoate Militarii si Vitezistii pentru ca tin de un eventual palmares al Stelei. Dar ros-albastrii si chiar si stelistii pot fi folosite chiar si dupa. Pentru ca nu sunt nume oficiale si fac parte din istoria clubului FCSB, asa cum ar fi el. Isi pot zice si "dinamovistii" daca vor. Yellow-sulphur-rose (talk) 22:58, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Inca ceva, daca vine maine Dinamo si isi spun "stelistii", nu are ce sa le faca nicio instanta judecatoreasca. Pentru ca nu este un nume oficial, este o porecla. Poreclele fie ele si "bogus", exista. De la short name, am scos Steaua ca sa nu se inteleaga altceva si exista o decizie judecatoreasca impotriva numelui. Cred ca ti-am explicat logic. Yellow-sulphur-rose (talk) 23:05, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at FCSB, you may be blocked from editing. Yellow-sulphur-rose (talk) 22:52, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Raspuns

Wikipedia nu e loc de ambitii prostesti si spre deosebire de alti oameni fara suflet, eu nu am reclamat niciodata pe nimeni. Mai ales pe romani nu as vrea. O sa iti raspund deci:

Ti-au spus mai multi: Nu poti sa tii cont de o decizie definitiva pentru ca ea se poate intoarce in urma unui apel, de aia ii si spune "nedefinitiva". Pentru ca palmaresurile sa fie modificate, trebuie sa se intample 2 lucruri: 1. FCSB sa piarda si la Curtea de Apel, adica CSA sa castige si apelul. 2. FRF / LPF trebuie sa vina si sa puna decizia in aplicare. Hotararea poate fi pusa in executare/devine executorie de drept. Deci iar, forul fotbalistic trebuie sa recunoasca hotararea judecatoareasca. Daca FRF / LPF nu o va recunoaste, ceea ce nu cred ca s-ar putea intampla dar traim in Romania, ar urma ca CSA Steaua si Talpan sa ii actioneze si pe ei in justitie. Deci trebuie sa se intample exact ce s-a intamplat si in legatura cu NUMELE. Nu a fost destul ca Becali sa mai piarda si la Curtea de Apel, ci a trebuit sa vina FRF / LPF sa constate cu juristii sai (poate si sfatuiti de UEFA) ca decizia trebuie sa fie pusa in aplicare. Klaus Iohannis de exemplu a pierdut o casa in drept civil, aici e vorba tot de drept civil, cum ar fi ca cineva sa iti ia casa tie de la prima instanta?
"Vitezistii" si "militarii" inca sunt niste porecle ce tin de istoria FCSB-ului, pentru ca FCSB inca detine palmaresul. Dupa ce palmaresul va merge probabil catre CSA, desigur ca le putem anula. Prin simplul fapt ca FCSB va exista atunci numai din 2003 incolo. Poreclele nu sunt nume oficiale si nu ar putea fi interzise de nicio instanta. Si in privinta folosirii numelui, el e interzis doar din momentul in care hotararea s-a pus in aplicare si s-a executat. Altceva: poreclele la fotbal sunt poreclele ce tin de intreaga istorie si de parcursul cluburilor in istoria lor deci. Nu e ca la box, cand te-ai numit Sfarma-Piatra si acum te numesti Papa-Lapte. Sau invers. La fotbal nu exista foste porecle, doar porecle.
PS. Nu ma intereseaza blocarea ci consensul si munca intelectuala.
PSS. Daca as fi fost rautacios, as fi mers pe pagina lui CSA Steaua si as fi editat palmaresul pe care l-ati adaugat abuziv. Din punctul meu de vedere nu e corect ce faceti. Pentru ca nu e profesionalism din partea unora, e batjocura.

Yellow-sulphur-rose (talk) 00:02, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Intr-adevar, nu s-a tinut cont chiar de la inceput de decizia modificarii numelui. Dar aici e vorba de altceva, suntem in urma cu deciziile, dovada ca tinem cont de redenumire dar nu putem vorbi inca de pierderea palmaresului si castigarea lui de CSA. Vine Curtea de Apel si dupa FORUL FOTBALISTIC trebuie sa puna in aplicare decizia, alfel iar e scandal juridic. Yellow-sulphur-rose (talk) 00:05, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stiu, doar ca juvetii e trecut si e parte din istoria lor. E una din poreclele faimoase si ce s-a folosit mai multi ani. Oricum in caz ca se pierde palmaresul, trecem Militarii si Vitezistii la CSA daca nu e trecut deja. Pentru ca FCSB va avea palmaresul numai din 2003 incolo. Yellow-sulphur-rose (talk) 11:23, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problema e alta, cat ma pricep eu la fotbal, se distruge un bun national si nu stiu daca palmaresul 2003-prezent ar putea fi atribuit lui CSA daca tot ii iau echipa lui Becali. Pe langa asta, nu stim daca va fi mai bine, in anii '90 s-a demonstrat ca nu sunt bani la privati. Iar generalii sunt si mincinosi si "burtile lor tre' sa manance". Am dubii despre seriozitatea CSA-ului. Mari dubii... Preferam sa o ia Geambazi, ala e si in anturajul lui Marica si e total diferit de batranelul senil! Este clar ca tandemul Becali-Stoica fac un fel de batjocura. Dar repet, fotbalului romanesc nu i-a fost mai bine dupa ce i-au curatat pe patroni. Yellow-sulphur-rose (talk) 11:41, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Craiova

Cum spunea user-ul de mai sus—De ce ai ambitii prostesti? GSP inca foloseste “CS U Craiova” si prescurtarea asta a fost folosita aproape exclusiv pana acum ceva timp, chiar trebuie sa fii asa incapatanat?8Dodo8 (talk · contribs) 20:01, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]