User talk:NickelbackSucks1518

Discussion pages

Please do not delete information off of other user's talk pages, like you keep doing at User talk:Nickelbackrules1518. It's not to be removed unless done by him, or especially offensive (what you keep removing does not qualify as such...) Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 23:53, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nickelbackrules1518/Archive with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Reaper Eternal (talk) 00:00, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Okay sorry NickelbackSucks1518 (talk) 00:03, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Nickelback with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tiderolls 00:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Who are you?

Your edits are all pretty much you removing any trace of the wrongdoing of Nickelbackrules1518. Heck, you made your user page exactly the same as his. If you're a friend of his, cut it out. TheStickMan^[✆Talk] 00:12, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

WTF is that supposed to mean..? I HATE Nickelback. I think they suck. NickelbackSucks1518 (talk) 00:14, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Acroterion (talk) 00:15, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

One account, please: the other one's not blocked. Acroterion (talk) 00:16, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

I just wanted a second account in case my main one gets banned like it has before. NickelbackSucks1518 (talk) 00:31, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NickelbackSucks1518 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

How did I abuse multiple accounts??? This is just stupid. This is my first account, idk what I did wrong.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 00:46, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Do you really want to go with that request? [1], [2] and a whole collection of edits to your other account? Acroterion (talk) 00:36, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Yes. Please unblock me. I deserve another chance, I've done nothing wrong. NickelbackSucks1518 (talk) 00:43, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

You can't possibly expect me to believe that, and in any case,I've left your other account, which you have acknowledged on this very page, unblocked. Stop wasting administrators' time. Use the other account, go forth and sin no more. Acroterion (talk) 00:45, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

But I like this username better (: NickelbackSucks1518 (talk) 00:47, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

That's not a valid reason. I starting to doubt anyone is going to take you seriously between all your editwarring and sockpuppets. Please stop all this nonsense... Sergecross73 msg me 00:53, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Talk page access of this sock account has now been revoked -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 00:55, 8 June 2011 (UTC)