User talk:NickWhiteArmy

April 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Nick White) for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Primefac (talk) 07:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

NickWhiteArmy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You just hijacked a page dedicated to a popular youtuber known as nick white. All information there was accurate. NickWhiteArmy (talk) 8:29 am, Today (UTC+1)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Doug Weller talk 08:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

NickWhiteArmy (talk) 07:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The edit history shows you as the one hijacking a disambiguation page. Also, we do not allow account names which imply shared use. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{Source assessment notes} 07:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is a useless page. I turned it into a REAL page for Nick White. a popular youtuber with 300k+ subscribers.

You the hijacked it and returned it to nothing. NickWhiteArmy (talk) 07:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If one hijacks a hijacked page, that sounds more like restoring the proper order of things. My colleagues believe I was too lenient in only blocking you from editing the article directly; please do not prove me wrong. Primefac (talk) 07:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I edited a empty page for no one. and made it for the most well known nick white. NickWhiteArmy (talk) 07:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages serve a purpose on Wikipedia, and that is to separate different topics that have the same name. Someone looking for the rugby players, the musician, or the dog trainer would be pissed that they're being shown an article on a random YouTuber they've never heard of before in their life instead of a page that points them towards what they're looking for. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{Source assessment notes} 07:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How do I make Nick White a page then? NickWhiteArmy (talk) 07:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What sort of in-depth, non-routine, independent-of-the-YouTuber news/review/scholarly sources do you have that discuss him at length, are written by identifiable authors, and have gone thru rigourous editorial oversight and fact-checking processes? Without those, we can't even discuss having an article. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{Source assessment notes} 07:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]