User talk:NickJohnRoberts
April 2015
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Disney Junior has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Disney Junior was changed by NickJohnRoberts (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952076 on 2015-04-02T12:36:37+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:36, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nick Jr. (UK and Ireland), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:52, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —SMALLJIM 12:55, 2 April 2015 (UTC)NickJohnRoberts (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Nick Jr. Is shit because they don't air the classics anymore. Disney Junior is better because they don't fork their channels into carbon copies that air the same shows in all countries. Except Canada because they don't have Sprout so theyre exception. Sofia the First is the best show. On earth. ABC Family is good too because they only have one international channel (in Canada, but expanding to all countries today). Delete Nick Jr.
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. PhilKnight (talk) 13:47, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
NickJohnRoberts (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Nobody cares about the shit that's Nick Jr. the better channels to watch are Disney Junior and ABC Family.
Decline reason:
The standard offer has been highly recommended to the user (below), and I second that recommendation. At this point in time, however, we will not be unblocking you. Stay true to your word, and you will likely be allowed to edit in 6 months time - if it is deemed appropriate by the reviewing admin at that time. — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 02:46, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hi, Finealt. You seem like a nice guy. Smart, travelled, Canadian (like me). This is what I do not understand. You're hurting people's lives. This is more than just about disagreeing with article content. We are volunteers. We'd rather be out snowboarding and watching movies than responding to this. It is not fair. You are a fair person, I trust. You love Wikipedia and use it. It is made by volunteers. We could also be working building the encyclopedia in other areas, but this is taking our human resources. I know you are trying to help Wikipedia, but it is hurting. Can we find some way to resolve this. After all, look at all the time you've put in. And for what? 100% reverted. Life is short. You could be doing something better. This is lose-lose. We are not losers, right? Well, frankly, we're all losing. How about just knowing that losing is no way to spend life and stopping. How about stepping away to rejoin the project in 6 months in a cooperative way? Then you could have effective influence on articles. Anything has to be better than losing. None of us want to continue that, you included. Thoughts? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:00, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- I will no longer be on Wikipedia for six months. I am a gamer now. I play on games games.com and miniclip.com and Xbox Live. I will come back and cooperate with other users. I will discussa and help. Goodbye. NickJohnRoberts (talk) 02:14, 3 April 2015 (UTC)
- Great news! Thank you!!! A gamer, eh? I like that. Okay, it looks like we'll all start winning again. According to Wikipedia:Standard offer, just give it six months with no socking, and when you return, contact me or another admin, and we'll take it from there. Best wishes, happy gaming, and see you in six. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:23, 3 April 2015 (UTC)