User talk:Nice Friendly Guy
May 2018
[edit]Hello, I'm Grayfell. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Gab (social network) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 01:50, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Table format on elections
[edit]Thanks for editing the US house election articles, but please stop capitalizing "congressional district", it is not a proper noun. Also stop changing the format of the total and election hold/gain section of the table, as it makes it look uneven/sloppy. The bars need to fully connect the table without having some sections look uneven. ThanksVietPride10 (talk) 19:43, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- Look at the regular congressional district articles on wikipedia, congressional district is not capitalized, it is not a proper noun. VietPride10 (talk) 20:06, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for providing the sources, I see the argument for capitalizing Congressional District now. One last issue, is if the election has write-ins, the reason I put the party as "n/a" is just for holistic table formatting reasons, so the table looks consistent. VietPride10 (talk) 21:07, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
- Look at the regular congressional district articles on wikipedia, congressional district is not capitalized, it is not a proper noun. VietPride10 (talk) 20:06, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
[edit]Thanks for your work adding election results! Marquardtika (talk) 22:04, 16 November 2018 (UTC) |
Capitalization of "congressional district"
[edit]Wikipedia follows its own style guide and avoids unnecessary capitalization where possible, per MOS:CAPS. Mélencron (talk) 13:10, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
- Again – Wikipedia follows its own style guide. Mélencron (talk) 04:52, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
- No, it doesn't, and consensus has been not to capitalize it, so conform to the article titles where possible. Mélencron (talk) 13:24, 18 November 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Missouri State Senate elections, 2018 has been accepted
[edit]You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Bkissin (talk) 15:55, 11 December 2018 (UTC)ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Important Notice
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.