User talk:Newzolt

October 2021

"One regimen for XDR-TB called Nix-TB, a combination pretomanid, bedaquiline, and linezolid,[19] has shown promise in early clinical trials.[20]" This was the scene a couple of years back. The early clinical trials referred to in the statement as well as nix tb trial has completed post treatment follow up also. The gross results of these trials with reference to a published article in indexed journal will add evidence to the statement. Please consider updating the results of this BPaL regime on Wikipedia page. Zenix and Nix TB are the two landmark trials on the regimes of Bedaquiline, Pretomanid and linezolid. Any reference giving the updated information on this regime should be fine. Newzolt (talk) 01:48, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of external links noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Gyanshankar Mishra citations by Newzolt. Thank you. ⁓ Hello 71 21:11, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 08:11, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Newzolt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

All the edits were in the referenced context only. None of them was added out of context. The edits were all from peer-reviewed scientific journals only. I believe they increased the quality of Wikipedia articles with updated information. Today Wikipedia articles need to be updated. Many sections still show "decade" long data as recent. None of the edits was scientifically incorrect. As referencing is a norm in Wikipedia, the latest references on the topic were provided. If we have a norm of not citing any particular researcher, then that would also be followed. The debate should happen on the scientific authenticity of the individual subject/edits.

Decline reason:

It sounds like you are not coming back, and don't wish to disclose your connection to the researcher involved as Wikipedia policy asks, so I am closing this request. Should you change your mind and wish to contribute, please make another request. 331dot (talk) 11:13, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It has been alleged that account is used "only" for advertising or promotion, which is factually incorrect. The account is adding credible information within context to the scientific evidence and content of Wikipedia articles. Newzolt (talk) 15:45, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Articles from International reputed Journals like Lancet respiratory medicine and Lancet infectious diseases have been removed by moderators! Newzolt (talk) 18:50, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is your connection to this researcher? 331dot (talk) 19:12, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I believe discussion should be centred on scientific credibility and context of content rather than the editor, as the contents have been referred to as spam by moderators. Newzolt (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It is now evident that moderators wish to continue with current position of ban. Thankyou. Newzolt (talk) 01:57, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are blocked, not banned.(there is a difference) Are you declining to answer the question? 331dot (talk) 07:48, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To be specific, it's WP:REFSPAM. And your possible connection with the author is very much relevant. Virtually all of your substantive edits since you started have been to cite Gyanshankar Mishra. Doug Weller talk 08:20, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]