User talk:Newbardolph

This is Newbardolph's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stuart Awbrey (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Apmh was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stuart Awbrey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ap m h 21:07, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Newbardolph! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ap m h 21:07, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Apmh!

Thank you for reviewing! Our subject died nearly 20 years ago. I have added more sources to establish "significant coverage." Newbardolph (talk) 00:02, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stuart Awbrey (June 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The E&P is a good source but the others are local or not independent. I see the E&P mentions he won several awards which might be helpful depending on what the awards were. See also WP:NJOURNALIST.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stuart Awbrey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 00:51, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Stuart Awbrey has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Stuart Awbrey. Thanks! S0091 (talk) 02:16, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I added the Peace Corp bit as evidence that he was indeed tied with PC. Newbardolph (talk) 00:44, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Newbardolph, that makes sense. I also noticed the paper is mentioned at Cranford, New Jersey#Local media so added a link in the draft but I noticed it only a mentions its closing. It would nice to have another sentence or two about when it was established, with sources if course, (hint, hint) but no more than that, though, given the section should only be a short list. S0091 (talk) 17:41, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Of course! I found a Library of Congress page that listed the founding date as 1893 The Cranford Chronicle. Added same to the article. Great suggestion! Newbardolph (talk) 04:00, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stuart Awbrey (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tutwakhamoe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I would advice against citing Cranford Chronicle and Peace Corps for the subject's involvement for neutrality concerns, use secondary source if possible. The draft's order of events is very messy, considering reorganize the contents in chronological orders and remove the detail descriptions of Cranford Chronicle. Claims such as involvements in Sesame Streets and receving 90 awards needs sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stuart Awbrey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 02:13, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Stuart Awbrey

Hello, Newbardolph. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stuart Awbrey, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stuart Awbrey

Hello, Newbardolph. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stuart Awbrey".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:09, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]