User talk:NeverTry4Me/Archive 17

This is an archive of past discussions with User:NeverTry4Me. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 10

←

Archive 15

August 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casuarina Senior College (2nd nomination)) for Violation of unblock conditions. Disruptive editing and bludgeoning on AfD..

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:51, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

NeverTry4Me (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

At first look it seems like I have violated the unblock conditions. But it isn't. I was building that page though I have nominated for AfD. Please have a look at the concerned page history where you will see I added some citations and still looking for refs. Nominating at AfD always mightn't be an intention to delete a page, specially to me, as after grabbing supporting resources I have withdrawn many nominations (please see my XfD log for nomination withdrawal). All I was working per rule and spent my time most adding references to unreferenced pages. The 2nd nomination was my attempt to grab some refs as per WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES as none gave any supporting refs in 1st nomination, which was also attempted for grabbing some references. The condition you put was 1 edit per day at AfD. I understand that I step out by replying two editors. But you should believe me, I was honestly trying to grab citations only as I don't have access to some newspapers for which subscriptions are needed. I believe bludgeoning and disruptive editing would have attracted me if I wanted the page to be deleted. I didn't want to delete the page but to get inline citations as per the page written.
I also understand that this time, you will unlikely unblock me. But believe me, if you check my contribution history you will surely find how many citations I have added to articles. I am here to build Wikipedia. The block and before mention on my talk page happened during my night sleep time. A warning would have stopped me and I would have withdrawn the nomination with non-admin closure (I did that several times, after getting needed refs). Just a day before I was on Wiki IRC help channel where I expressed how I am learning (Tamzin was witnessing everything at that time) everyday in Wiki and how Wikipedia changed my life. But all the decisions are up to the Administrators. If my contribution history can't satisfy Wiki, then I should get out of Wiki, (but I hate being a sock, hence no point to come being a sock), with some shame that I couldn't finish some bigger drafts.
All the above statements are made within my fresh mind and with good faith. Regards _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 4:58 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Accept reason:

If you intend to withdraw the AfD, the block is not needed. Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:33, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Comment: Oh, I just realized that I have been blocked on that AfD page only.(while trying to click submit button on a citation at Juan Carlos Onetti page. Thank you @Deepfriedokra: for this block. I have accepted this block as I deserved it. Doing citation work, I had gone so far that I used to accept the WP:BURDEN of adding refs in every unreferenced article. And that shouldn't be a problem to Wiki, I believe. I am enjoying adding resources things because it is helping me to read things. Thank you again for blocking me from the page.
If possible kindly close the AfD on my behalf as the nomination is withdrawn, with my statement "I do hereby withdraw the nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casuarina Senior College (2nd nomination) with good faith and request a rewrite and ref improve to support the inline contents." Regards- _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 21:52, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Comment: @Deepfriedokra: done as intended. I shall stop taking citation burden, staying away from the page, and leaving it to other editors. That would be the best for the page.

Hello, I'm The Banner. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Casuarina Senior College have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. The Banner talk 11:49, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

@The Banner That is not vandalism, ~~Your coordinate doesn't identify the article subject in any maps. Please refrain from misleading geocoded.~~ _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 11:54, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

It points straight to the building intended. So the coordinates are valid. The Banner talk 12:14, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

@The Banner: I have redacted my comment with good faith and tender my apology with good faith. Perhaps this is my last message to anyone in Wiki. _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 03:56, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. Theroadislong (talk) 10:52, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

@Theroadislong its too late. :) _{- Signed by}NeverTry4Me ^Talk 12:19, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

You've got mail

Hello, NeverTry4Me. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

DIVINE (talk) 15:26, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, NeverTry4Me. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 22:48, 6 August 2022 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Justi yaya 22:48, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Moving forward

I understand your anger, hurt and frustration, but you are talking yourself into an indefinite block. In hopes of averting that, I will remove talk page access for the duration.
@Justiyaya: If you could offer some guidance and encouragement that might avert an indefinite block, it might help avert an indefinite block.
I ask that anyone with concerns about NT4M's editing please direct them to NT4M's mentor, user talk:Justiyaya. Posting here only further angers and frustrates an already angry, frustrated user.

Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:45, 6 August 2022 (UTC)}

Hello, NeverTry4Me,

I came to your talk page to see what had happened to you. Your block is only for one week and expires on August 12, 2022 but you are acting as if it is indefinite. You are fortunate that Deepfriedokra took away your talk page access because your reaction to your block, while understandable, is just unacceptable. Most editors don't receive "thanks" for the work they do. The bitterness and anger in your comments over the past day could have led some admins to give you an indefinite block as a sign that you are unable to work on a collaborative editing project. We all experience conflict and frustration here unless you have carved out some little niche area to edit in that no other editors spends time working in. We have to collaborate with people whose views we disagree with or whom we actually dislike.

If dealing with disagreement is too difficult, maybe you shouldn't return to Wikipedia as an editor. But I also see good work that you do and I hope you do return as a contributor. You just have to not let your emotions cause you to make rash comments towards others, no matter how much you feel that they "deserve" it. Incivility has resulted in some very, very experienced editors to get indefinite blocks and I believe that you can control your temper if you try. Return to working with and discussing problems with your mentor when you find yourself getting frustrated. Good luck! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:07, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

NeverTry4Me, I read your email, and I'm very sorry that happened. I'm sorry for your loss. Moving forward, it would probably be a good idea to take a wikibreak from two weeks before to two weeks after the anniversaries of those events. I've lived some experiences that left some scars and about which I still grieve. If Wikipedia is causing even more stress, you should take some time away so as not to pile too much on at once. Best. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:21, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, NeverTry4Me. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. Justi yaya 14:13, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simlabari (Goalpara) has been accepted

Simlabari (Goalpara), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dwaipayan (talk) 01:39, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lelhar has been accepted

Lelhar, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.