User talk:NetizenNoWork

This is NetizenNoWork's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Les' Copaque Production Sdn Bhd (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Les' Copaque Production Sdn Bhd, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:NetizenNoWork/sandbox/Les' Copaque Production Sdn Bhd and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 08:12, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! NetizenNoWork, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 08:12, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DaDuDiDo (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of films, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DaDuDiDo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 10:49, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Puteri (Animated Series) (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of films, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Puteri (Animated Series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 10:54, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of DaDuDiDo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article DaDuDiDo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DaDuDiDo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Ammarpad (talk) 13:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

After your articles have been declined, instead of you to fix the issues highlighted, you start moving them to mainspace. I hope you will stop that. And focus in finding good references for your article, so no one will decline them. You can still improve this article it is now back in the draft Draft:Puteri (Animated Series). The other has already been nominated for deletion, however you can still improve it — Ammarpad (talk) 13:47, 3 November 2017 (UTC) — Ammarpad (talk) 13:47, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Les' Copaque Production Sdn Bhd (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Narutolovehinata5 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Les' Copaque Production Sdn Bhd and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 10:12, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Puteri (Animated Series)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Puteri (Animated Series), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 19:29, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Moved from Draft talk:Puteri (Animated Series)

Good day, I would like to request for the moderators to not delete this page just yet and allow me to do some further editings to meet the Wikipedia standards. I admit that I did a lot of wrong things before this as I had no prior knowledge on how to build a proper Wikipedia Article. I would like to thank the admins/volunteers who have given some feedback to fix my prior mistakes. Currently I am planning to do further adjustments for the drafts that I have created before which are; DaDuDiDo, Puteri (Animated Series) and Les' Copaque Productions.

Very sorry for the trouble causedNetizenNoWork (talk) 02:17, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@NetizenNoWork: If what you claim is true, why when the draft was declined you didn't do anything to fix the mistakes you're shown but instead circumvented the process and moved it into mainspace? How can you assure us you'll now follow the feedback you're given in your drafts so as to improve them? — Ammarpad (talk) 04:02, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very sorry for that action, and as I've mentioned. I know nothing on how to work in Wikipedia. I assure you that I will not move the articles around anymore and will focus more to further improve my articles until it's properly approved by the editors and admins. I am currently working and editing my articles slowly from their Draft Pages, it won't be single significant changes, but I will add and edit as I go until I am confident of resubmitting the articles which might take a while. Honestly, I'm still worried I would make mistakes in the future, which I do not want and trouble everyone. Is there a way that you could recommend to me where I could continue drafting my articles and have an experienced Wikipedia writer to monitor me to avoid any further mistakes? Am I able to continue reediting my current draft pages for DaDuDiDo, Puteri (Animated Series) and Les' Copaque Productions? I have plenty of questions, and I worry I might cause mistakes due to my misunderstandings with the Wikipedia rules and regulations. Again, I'm truly sorry and I hope that you could give me a chance to fix back my mistakes and continue back with my 3 drafts.NetizenNoWork (talk) 04:35, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, you can still continue improving the drafts and submit when you're done. But beyond that, you've special case, because you admitted that your boss (or company) tasked you with the responsibility of creating page for them. At Teahouse, I believe they reasonably answered your questions. But after that I may advise you to read and understand the following thoroughly;

After that if you still have reasonable question to ask you can go to Teahouse again or place {{Help me}} with your question on your talkpage and any volunteer editor will answer you. — Ammarpad (talk) 05:38, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for understanding Ammarpad I'll be sure to progress carefully from now on. Thank you very much for the reference links, I'll be sure to take extra notes on all of it.NetizenNoWork (talk) 06:11, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, that's how Wikipedia is built by newcomers everyday like you. In the above I saw you tried to mention me by using [[Ammarpad]], but that will not work it may lead you to an article. If you want to mention any editor use {{ping|Ammarpad}} format. For information on this see Wikipedia Notification, — Ammarpad (talk) 06:59, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Puteri (Animated Series) (November 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. References are mostly blogs which do not indicate notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Puteri (Animated Series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 02:27, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pada Zaman Dahulu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pada Zaman Dahulu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from lescopaque.com/v11/our-works/pada-zaman-dahulu. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 15:31, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Les' Copaque Production Sdn Bhd

Hello, NetizenNoWork. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Les' Copaque Production Sdn Bhd".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 00:12, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Les' Copaque Production Sdn Bhd

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Les' Copaque Production Sdn Bhd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 02:37, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Puteri (Animated Series) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Puteri (Animated Series), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Puteri (Animated Series)

Hello, NetizenNoWork. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Puteri".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 10:00, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]