User talk:Nervouswrecked
Welcome!
[edit]
|
July 2019
[edit] Hello, I'm Elizium23. I noticed that you recently removed content from Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Francisco without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Elizium23 (talk) 20:27, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Robert Francis Christian, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 20:37, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
- Hello, if you are aware of a reliable secondary source indicating the death of Christian, please share it with us, because I found none in a Google search. Elizium23 (talk) 20:38, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
- Official website - nothing. Twitter - silent. Facebook - zip. If you have a source, then please say what it is! Elizium23 (talk) 20:59, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
- Hello, if you are aware of a reliable secondary source indicating the death of Christian, please share it with us, because I found none in a Google search. Elizium23 (talk) 20:38, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
Charles X of France
[edit]Howdy. Will you please stop changing Louis Antoine's status appearance in his father's infobox. Louis' not listed as a French monarch by most historians. Charles X's successor is Louis Philip I. GoodDay (talk) 00:37, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Will you please stop? GoodDay (talk) 15:45, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
An extended welcome
[edit]Hi Nervouswrecked. Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.
Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.
If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.
Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.
I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Ronz (talk) 21:23, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
November 2019
[edit] Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Emperor of India. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Celia Homeford (talk) 08:20, 6 November 2019 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Emperor of India. Celia Homeford (talk) 14:09, 12 November 2019 (UTC)