User talk:Nehasrm2518

This is Nehasrm2518's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rohit Jaisoriya (November 10)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by SafariScribe was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:25, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nehasrm2518! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 08:25, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Hanuman Chalisa. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Apparition¹¹ ^Talk/Contribs 12:41, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i think i removed adding link instead of i add citition which add the value of Hanuman chalisa article which citition provide meaning of Hanuman chalisa, benifits of recite Hanuman chalisa and wpija vidhi etc. Nehasrm2518 (talk) 13:11, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hello sir please help me to write. I don't know where i am wrong. I can't personal permotion. I add the value to this article.

Please tell me where i am wrong they add their 2 to 3 external links by one site owner hows that possible. I add the value to this article you also read they write Hanuman chalisa padne ke 21 fayde at no 3 above, but which article i add has so much information not only hanuman chalisa but so more which user got high value.

I don't know what you think. May be you think they are new or beginners so don't believe on him but this is so wrong to judge any person potential. I know when i start i need to understand but now i totally understand their policy. You can remove my links because i am beginner. If there was someone else with experience in my place, you would not have even seen and approved directly. Nehasrm2518 (talk) 11:52, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Ageing, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. and on Biological immortality. And please read WP:MINOR. Meters (talk) 08:05, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Meters Thank you for your feedback. I understand your concerns regarding adding links to external sites. Please know that my intention was not to engage in self-promotion but to provide additional value to the article. The website I referenced is new, and I believe Wikipedia is an authoritative source where readers can find quality information. Although the site is relatively small, the content aims to be useful. I assure you that my goal is to enhance the article with helpful resources, not for promotional purposes. I appreciate your understanding and will be more careful in the future. Nehasrm2518 (talk) 08:13, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Ageing. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Stop adding this link. Meters (talk) 08:09, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Meters Thank you for your feedback, and I sincerely apologize for any misunderstanding. I understand the importance of maintaining Wikipedia’s integrity. My intent was never to spam or promote a website, but rather to provide additional, valuable resources for readers. I appreciate the work that goes into ensuring the quality of content here and will respect the guidelines moving forward. I assure you that I’ll be more mindful of my contributions in the future. Nehasrm2518 (talk) 08:16, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Meters Thank you for your feedback. I understand the importance of maintaining Wikipedia's quality standards, and I apologize if my actions were seen as inappropriate. I am a beginner here, and I feel that sometimes new users, like myself, are treated differently. There are many experienced editors who, while claiming credibility, later promote their own websites. While I understand the guidelines, I believe that if an external link genuinely adds value to an article, it should be considered, even if the website is small or less known. It seems that the focus is more on the editor's credibility rather than whether the link truly enhances the content. I am still learning and will be more cautious in the future, but I hope this perspective can be understood. Nehasrm2518 (talk) 08:26, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It has nothing to do with you being a new user. You are not being reverted because you are a new user, but because your edits are not improving the encyclopedia. You were already warned for trying to add a link to your own website, but now you are attempting add another questionable link. Why should we link to this particular site? We have no idea who is behind agecalcy.com or how they do their calculations. I wouldn't accept that site as reliable source, so it's not an appropriate external link. It's not a minor edit to add the link, even if it were an appropriate link it would not go in the "See also" section, and it's certainly not appropriate for you to restore the link after it has already been removed from two articles and you have been warned about it. See WP:BRD and WP:ELNO. Meters (talk) 09:11, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]