User talk:Nebulous2357

Welcome, roadfan!

Hello, Nebulous2357, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask a question on your talk page.

If you are interested, there is already a community of users who are roadfans or who edit articles about roads, just like you! Stop by any of these WikiProjects—WP:HWY (worldwide), WP:AURD (Australia), WP:CARD (Canada), WP:HKRD (Hong Kong), WP:INRD (India), WP:UKRD (United Kingdom), or WP:USRD (United States)—and contribute. If your interest is in roads in the United States, there is an excellent new user's guide. There is a wealth of information and resources for creating a great article. If you have questions about any of these WikiProjects, you can ask on each project's talk page, or you can ask me!

If you like communicating through IRC, feel free to ask questions at #wikipedia-en-roads ^connect as well. Here, there are several editors who are willing to answer your questions. For more information, see WP:HWY/IRC.

Again, welcome! Rs chen 7754 21:05, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zatch Bell!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bionix. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Path 27, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages MW and KV.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Links to user pages and sandboxes

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to user pages or sandboxes, as you did at Path 27. Since these pages have not been accepted as articles, user pages, sandboxes and drafts are not suitable for linking in articles. and such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been deleted, please do not re-add any such links, thank you - Arjayay (talk) 08:58, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation pages

Hi, although DPL Bot is quick to tell you you've made a wikilink to a dab page, it doesn't tell you the best fix, which is: At the top right of this page, click on Preferences → Gadgets, and under Appearances, enable/check "Display links to disambiguation pages in orange." It does exactly that, when you press the Preview button. It's often an eye-opener to see that what you thought was unique may be quite common. I almost always navigate to the correct page, copy the article title, and paste it between the square brackets. Best wishes, MinorProphet (talk) 06:30, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Path 27

Hi Nebulous2357, I'm contacting you here at your request. There's a lot to discuss about the Path 27 article and I would welcome dialog by email; if that's OK with you I'll provide my email address.

Where I have concerns with details and phrasing in the article as it stands, please know that my goal is in keeping the article accurate and consistent with prevailing style on Wikipedia. I respect the effort you made and it is good to see the enthusiasm you have for the topic.

To start: I believe your calculation of 4800A is incorrect. When operating in bipolar mode at 2400MW, the potential difference between the two conductors is 1000kV which corresponds with a current of 2400A.

For an example of correct relationship of current/voltage/power in a bipolar HVDC line, see https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Pacific_DC_Intertie#History which says "...maximum current of 1,800 amperes, for a transmission rating of 1,440 MW with a symmetrical voltage of 400 kV with respect to earth." 800kV * 1800A = 1440MW.

I also suggest that the calculated max current need not appear in as many places in the Path 27 article as it does. And where it appears in the Infobox under Technical Information, it deserves its own section rather than being included under Power rating, as current is not power.

best regards, Tom239 (talk) 17:24, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Tom239!

To start, I'm not an electrical engineer. Regardless, I’ve admired HVDC as one of the most intriguing feats of engineering and technology about.

I merely have a basic understanding about electricity and its properties: wattage is the amount of power; voltage describes the force that pushes the power in a circuit; and amperage is the strength of the flow of electricity along a conductive pathway. Simplistically speaking, a current is proportional to power, and is not power itself, so you are correct.

I obviously have much to learn about power and amperage ratings for a bipolar system. I only gleaned the information about Path 27’s ratings from a table on a provided bibliographic source. However, I’m concerned that providing the complexity of current/voltage/power on the article itself might be too technical and confusing for readers, as well as distracting because the subject is the power line itself. Yet with additional citations, it could work better on a footnote. In the link you gave me, the article’s poor writing also added to the obscurity of the matter.

The Infobox wasn’t created from thin air; instead, I used this template as seen on the Nelson River DC Transmission System article. You are free to edit this template in the manner you see fit. The explanatory note on the max. current doesn’t have to be on the Infobox per your advice, but it should for now stay as is on the article body, just in case readers need to know how amperage can be calculated.

Ta-ta! Nebulous2357 (talk) 05:41, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Another point: "Both conductors for the entire length are three cables bundled together; this is done to reduce the effects of EM interference and enhance conductance." There is no reference given for this claim; why do you think bundle conductors improve conductance on a DC line? Tom239 (talk) 20:53, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I guess that "Conductance" might have been a poor word choice. It is a measurement of the "ease with which an electric current passes" on a conductor, symbolized by the capital letter G. Of course, that term has mostly been applied to alternating current, rather than direct current. All I’ve been trying to emphasize is that bundle conductors give electricity a greater medium to flow more effectively, notwithstanding the type of current. "Conductivity" may have been a better term, but you can help me decide a more proper parlance to use here.

Anything else? Nebulous2357 (talk) 06:36, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zatch Bell! article

Hi Nebulous2357. I understand your effort in wanting to add more content to the article, but I recommend that you better familiarize yourself with the site's policies. Several of the sites you cited are personal websites, WP:USERG sources, and other ones that are explicitly regarded as unreliable at WP:A&M/ORS. I wanted to correct some of the content that you added, but it was too much that needed to be corrected, and although I believe that not everything you added deserves to be discarded, I think it would be better to keep correcting before re-publishing changes in the article. I hope you understand. Xexerss (talk) 16:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Xexerss! I did a check on each website used for the citations yet didn't realize that a majority were user-generated. Either the information about those sites may have been faulty, or I was just gullible. Whichever the case, my abjectly finite resources led me to them. I rewrote the article externally using TextEdit and saved it into a Rich Text file. I don't know of a quick way to send the file to you, but if there is, you can review it and make all the necessary changes. It is typed in Wikitext-ready format so that you can transcribe it through your sandbox. I put my whole heart and devoted an entire summer into this project. Thanks for noticing! Nebulous2357 (talk) 07:25, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I'm amazed that you were able to review the changes in a matter of minutes. Such a feat would have taken me hours if not days! Nebulous2357 (talk) 07:25, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]