User talk:Navin731

Welcome!

Hello, Navin731, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:SKILLING YOU- MAKING INDIA SKILLFUL, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Dan arndt (talk) 14:07, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:SKILLING YOU- MAKING INDIA SKILLFUL

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:SKILLING YOU- MAKING INDIA SKILLFUL, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Dan arndt (talk) 14:07, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: SKILLING YOU- MAKING INDIA SKILLFUL (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SKILLING YOU- MAKING INDIA SKILLFUL and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SKILLING YOU- MAKING INDIA SKILLFUL, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 14:07, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Navin731! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 14:07, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

Hello, Navin731. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. The page Draft:SKILLING YOU- MAKING INDIA SKILLFUL has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not an outlet for promotion, advocacy, or advertising.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see this page on citing sources. This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{references}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE and on IRC chat.

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 14:14, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Skilling-you

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Skilling-you, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kleuske (talk) 20:04, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Navin731. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. The page Draft:Skilling-you has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

This article needs to be rewritten from scratch from reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not an outlet for promotion, advocacy, or advertising.

Information on content and common pitfalls to avoid can be located here and here, however be aware that this is not an exhaustive list. Pages can sometimes avoid these pitfalls and still be seen as an ad copy or unambiguously promotional, particularly if the editor appears to be a paid editor or has some other conflict of interest. Please review these policies, including the FAQ page on organizations to determine if this applies to you.

Common mistakes or beliefs about promotional editing center on the assumption that promotional editing only applies to promotion for commercial gain. Some tags or G11 nominations are met with confusion by creators, particularly if they spend much time reading or creating corporate documents, mission/vision statements, or similar copy for their organization. The frequent exposure to promotional tone may make it difficult to notice non-neutral phrases or styles, as the editor has grown accustomed to seeing it as everyday writing or speech. This can be difficult, but not impossible, to unlearn.

Another common assumption is that the prohibition against promotional editing applies only to businesses or organizations. Anything can be promoted, including a person, a non-commercial organization, a point of view, etc. and CV/resumé's are by their nature promotional.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see this page on citing sources. This page has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{references}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there. New article creation can be difficult, but the Article Wizard can help you. The new user tutorial can help you avoid future problems. You can also ask for help at the TEAHOUSE and on IRC chat.

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:16, 21 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Skilling You (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Skilling You and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Skilling You, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:29, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Skilling You (February 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ingenuity were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Skilling You and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Skilling You, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 16:03, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Re: Draft:Skilling You

"Skilling You has been mentioned and appreciated in many esteemed newspapers widely read in India" sounds vague Could you please reword it to make it more factual? Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 08:37, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

"Dainik Bhaskar, one of the most circulated newspapers" and "The Economic Times, one of the acclaimed newspapers" could you please remove these descriptions? Mentioning name of the newspaper is more than enough. --Gryllida (talk, e-mail) 08:37, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Skilling You has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Skilling You. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:28, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Skilling You (February 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Skilling You and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Skilling You, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:30, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Skilling You for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Skilling You is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skilling You until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:15, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Skilling You, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Zsohl^(Talk) 13:26, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

The AFD has not run it's course yet so there is absolutely no "keep" result yet. Theroadislong (talk) 13:53, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Paid editing

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Navin731, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Navin731|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 13:54, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Skilling You) for a period of 1 week for disruption. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:55, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Navin731, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as N95rohit (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 13:57, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Unblocking per discussion Special:permalink/1073965357#For unblocking me. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:12, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

@Deepfriedokra User is back at it, recreating this article with a slightly different title after it was AfD'd. -- asilvering (talk) 02:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

@Asilvering: I've blocked for a week. Left me know if that doesn't do the trick. @Navin731: I should just block you indefinitely for spamming and disruption. Please do not make me do that. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:00, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

@Deepfriedokra ok i understand whatever you mentioned and can you for the last time unblock me please if you see me doing this again without taking permission you can block me permanently i am asking to you as a human being please unblock me for the first and last time and want to ask that i can't write on this topic again. if i want to write on this topic so what measure and steps i have to take and i have to take the permission from somebody to write on this topic. If has to take the permission so where can i get it and what are the steps to get it. Please help me out i will be very thankful to you. Navin731 (talk) 18:22, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

"Whatever you mentioned" tells me you don't know what you are not to do or don't want to know. You 1) will not create or edit about Skilling you, by any title and anywhere on Wikipedia. 2) Please tell us what constructive edits you would make. Please read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID. Your frantic urgency to edit about this subject implies a connection. You are teetering on the brink of being indefinitely blocked for promotional editing. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:35, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

@Deepfriedokra "Whatever you mentioned" tells me you don't know what you are not to do or don't want to know. I am extremely sorry from the bottom of my heart if i had said it any wrong manner. I was not saying it in a bad aspect or manner i replied and meant that i totally understand now that you have mentioned "I should just block you indefinitely for spamming and disruption". I will help and edit the articles suggested by the Wikipedia by first editing easy topics and then gradually moving to hard topics. I will always remember in my mind the Five Pillars (principles) of Wikipedia that are 1.Wikipedia is an encyclopedia 2. Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view 3. Wikipedia is free content that anyone can use, edit, and distribute 4. Wikipedia's editors should treat each other with respect and civility 5. Wikipedia has no firm rules. I read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID and i will disclose about from whom i am getting paid to write or edit the article of my employer. At last i fully understand your both 1 and 2 point but want to be more clear that if i disclose that i am getting paid to edit and write article about Skilling you and who is my employer so can i write about them without promoting them and anything which comes strictly under the WP:COI terms and guidelines and rules i will not violate or go against them and keeping every rules in mind about how to write article on Wikipedia because it is an encyclopedia not any other platform. So please help me and please don't be angry i am asking for your help and suggestion and i will always remember it and will be very thankful to you from the bottom of my heart. Navin731 (talk) 19:14, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

Skilling you moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Skilling you, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 12:28, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank You. Navin731 (talk) 12:54, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Skilling you (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Skilling you and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Skilling you, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:08, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Skilling you (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Skilling you and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Skilling you, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:52, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Can you please review my article. Can it be moved to main article. Navin731 (talk) 17:10, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Skilling you (March 15)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Asilvering was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: AfD'd on 4 March. Submitting editor is the original creator of the AfD'd article.

asilvering (talk) 02:34, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:58, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello Navin731. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Navin731. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Navin731|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:58, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Please see above --Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:37, 16 March 2022 (UTC)

@Deepfriedokra

Navin731 (talk) 07:21, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

{{paid | user=Navin731|employer=Skilling You | client= Skilling You}} Navin731 (talk) 04:16, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Skilling you and all it's title variants

Thank you for the PAID disclosure. Considering all the disruption you've caused, I don't think you can edit about this subject constructively. I think you need to find something else to edit about. If you cause anymore disruption, you will be blocked for an indefinite period. Speaking of disruption, what other accounts have you used.? I feel as if I've had this conversation before. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 07:43, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

@Deepfriedokra as such I am not using any other account this is my one and only primary account and I will keep in mind as you mentioned above about everything that on this topic I can't edit. I totally agree on the above mentioned subject that if I cause anymore disruption, then I will be blocked for an indefinite period. Navin731 (talk) 10:38, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Praveen Kumar Rajbhar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Praveen Kumar Rajbhar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Praveen Kumar Rajbhar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mvqr (talk) 11:32, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

@Mvqr Can you please tell me what are the points to be or can be edited so it can't be deleted and it is about a person. How can i improve it. Please help me out i am eagerly waiting for your precious and important thought's and comment's so i can edit it. Navin731 (talk) 11:47, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

You can edit the article, just don't remove the AfD template. Read Wikipedia:Notability (people) for biography notability. Mvqr (talk) 11:53, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

@Mvqr can you please help me to edit it i have gone through Wikipedia:Notability (people) for biography notability. Please edit my article i request you please help me it will be great help for me. It's a humble request to you please. Navin731 (talk) 11:04, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

In my opinion this article does not pass the notability guideline, so it should be deleted, not improved. Mvqr (talk) 11:06, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Skilling you

Hello, Navin731. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Skilling you".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 03:26, 1 October 2022 (UTC)