User talk:NativeForeigner/Archive/Archive-May2010
This is an archive of past discussions with User:NativeForeigner. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Thank you for your participation in the April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive
On behalf of my co-coordinator Wizardman, I'd like to especially thank you for your efforts over this past month's GAN backlog elimination drive. It has been nothing short of a complete success, which hopefully results in more expedient good article reviews, increasing users' confidence in the good article nomination processes. Even if you made just a small contribution, it still helped contribute to the success of this drive. Here is what we have accomplished this last month in this drive.
For those who have accomplished certain objectives in the drive, awards will be coming shortly. Again, thank you for your help in the drive, and I hope you continue to help review GA nominations and overall improve the quality of articles here on Wikipedia. |
–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 17:49, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Removal of PROD from Mark Brunetz
Hello NativeForeigner, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Mark Brunetz has been removed. It was removed by Jclemens with the following edit summary '(sourced it, deprodding)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with Jclemens before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 09:42, 3 May 2010 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages) 09:42, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : L (April 2010)
| |||
It's been a month since the end of the coordinator elections, and I am proud to inform the project that the IX coordinator tranche is doing well. Our new coordinators are rapidly learning the ropes, and the last of the task forces under consideration for merging have been consolidated into a new task force which should increase productivity and improve quality article output. At the moment the coordinators are discussing preliminary plans for an improved version of The Bugle, and are working with editors from the American Civil War task force who are in the process of organizing a new special project relating to that conflict. It is our hope to see these changes implemented in the upcoming month. Lastly, as many of our members are also in school, we extend our best wishes to all who will be taking final exams both this month and next. For the IX coordinator tranche, TomStar81 (Talk) 22:36, 30 April 2010 (UTC) |
New featured articles:
New featured lists: New featured topics: New featured portals: New A-Class articles:
| ||
| |||
| |||
| |||
This month we're taking a look at the Military history WikiProject's special projects. At present we have three—Operation Great War Centennial, Operation Majestic Titan, and Operation Normandy—with, as Tom mentions in his introduction, a fourth coming on line as this newsletter goes out.
Special projects are a great way of organising a long-term collaboration with a specific end-point in mind, and tend to be more goal-oriented and focused than the general task forces or informal working groups. Joining a special project is also a fantastic way to work alongside like-minded editors with whom you'll undoubtedly develop close working relationships; by your third or fourth FA submission you'll hopefully be operating as part of a well-oiled team. Editor roles are many and varied: content writers, source material providers, image- and map-makers, copy editors, reviewers, MoS gurus, wikignomes, specialists and generalists... you're sure to find a job that suits you and benefits the team. If you have an idea for a special project or are already undertaking a collaboration that you think fits in with the ethos of those above, and you'd like to benefit from Milhist's support and infrastructure, consider dropping the coordinators a note. Personally I've found the synergy and teamwork of contributing to a special project (Operation Normandy in my case) to be one of the most rewarding and enjoyable aspects of my time here. I hope you will too. EyeSerenetalk 14:16, 4 May 2010 (UTC) | |||
To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here. |
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:33, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
Happy NativeForeigner's Day!
User:NativeForeigner has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, Peace, A record of your Day will always be kept here. |
For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:05, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
- Congratulations! :D —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 06:07, 16 May 2010 (UTC)
- ¡Muchismas gracias! Thanks a lot. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 00:37, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
It seems that you were not notified with the request to give more input on this nomination. I trust that the nomination period will be expanded to allow your input. Thanks for participating. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 19:24, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
WT:OMT discussion
Hello, NativeForeigner! I am informing you that there is a discussion at WT:OMT#Moving forward on whether or not to implement a reward called the Titan's Cross. As you list yourself as a member of the project, I suggest you vote in it. Have fun! Buggie111 (talk) 20:06, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Hi NativeForeigner! Thanks for the input on the Starcraft 2 page. I am still relatively noobish as an editor so I appreciate the feedback. However it seemed to me that the original interview with the CEO was about as good as you could get for a reliable source. And when you're dealing with something like fan criticism, a page that has thousands of unique votes on the topic seems fairly reliable as well. But perhaps I'm off base ... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zuchinni one (talk • contribs) 05:48, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Normally I would agree with you about the reliability of an internet poll. But the teamliquid site is very well run. You need to be a registered user to vote and they disable multiple accounts from the same IP address. So there is high likihood that almost all of the 5000 votes thus far are legitimate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zuchinni one (talk • contribs) 06:21, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
About your Admin Coaching request
Your submission at Admin Coaching has been removed from the request list, as requests where the submitter has not visited the page for at least 6 months (or been inactive for at least 4 months) are removed. You are welcome to re-submit a request should you wish to, but please note that you are expected to regularly check the page (and to update the "last visited" field of your request) to show your continued interest in the project. If you do re-submit, please carefully re-read the instructions for submission as they may have changed since you last visited! As noted on the project page, there is an on-going backlog with the project, as so few admins are currently coaching. This means that you may have a long wait for a response (if you receive one at all). If you no longer require admin coaching, I hope that you continue to enjoy editing Wikipedia! Regards, — Jeff G. ツ 18:57, 31 May 2010 (UTC) |
Already taken care of. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 19:08, 31 May 2010 (UTC)