User talk:Nataliembent

Welcome!

Hello, Nataliembent! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:40, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

This is Nataliembent's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daya Reddy (September 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CASSIOPEIA was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daya Reddy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Daya Reddy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:03, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nataliembent! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:03, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daya Reddy (October 1)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Andrew Base was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Andrew Base (talk) 15:47, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daya Reddy has been accepted

Daya Reddy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Barkeep49 (talk) 13:34, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Nataliembent! You created a thread called Will my article be published? at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Citations needed

Where my article shows "citation needed" - can general information regarding the subject be included? If not, can it please be explained what kind of information is required here? Thank you Nataliembent (talk) 14:27, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nataliemebent, pls provide hist diff, so I may advise you. For how to provide hist diff - pls see here - Wikipedia:Simplest diff guide. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:40, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nataliemebent, if you meant "citation needed" on the Daya Reddy then, you should provide source as per the the paragraph claimed in the article. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:42, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disclosure

I am employed by the University of Cape Town and am line managed by Daya Reddy - in full disclosure I wish to acknowledge that I have volunteered to create the page Daya Reddy and am not being compensated for the creation, nor any editing of the page as it does not fall within my job description. Nataliembent (talk) 07:23, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nataliembent, Good day. You need to disclosed your conflict of interest (COI) on (1). The article talk page Daya Reddy - HERE and (2) on your user page (not your talk page). Your user page is User:Nataliembent - click on the red link and click on "create source" on the top menu and place "UserboxCOI template" (as per instructions) . Please follow the instruction on WP:DISCLOSE. Use "Connected contributor template" on the article talk page and "UserboxCOI template" on your user page. Let me know if anything else I could help. Thank you. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 07:35, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Daya Reddy. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 15:21, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nataliembent! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Daya Reddy that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 13:24, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]