User talk:Natacha art

Welcome!

Hello, Natacha art, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Zemun did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Adakiko (talk) 12:10, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Rudnik (Gornji Milanovac)

Your edit here was unsourced. Adakiko (talk) 12:12, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BTW: Your edits are saved in the wp:page history. Feel free to restore them with a citation. Adakiko (talk) 12:13, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thx a lot. Best regards! Natacha art (talk) 13:04, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Biographies

You may find wp:biographies of living persons and wp:Manual of Style/Biography useful. Please note, per wp:CREDENTIAL, "professor", "Dr.", etc. should not be used. Note: the articles William James Mayo, Linus Pauling, and Albert Einstein do not use (or should not have) Dr. or prof. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 12:36, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ok thx :) Natacha art (talk) 13:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dragoslav Djukanovic (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Slightly promotional and external links in body of articles should be replaced with wikilinks. It would also be nice if some of the links include URLs.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dragoslav Djukanovic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dragoslav Djukanovic, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 07:40, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Natacha art! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Gusfriend (talk) 07:40, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Dragoslav Djukanovic has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dragoslav Djukanovic. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 22:44, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dragoslav Djukanovic (July 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Work is required here. Please use {{ISBN}} for the ISBNs of the items you choose as references, but note what we ned:

For a living person we have a high standard of referencing. Every substantive fact you assert, especially one that is susceptible to potential challenge, requires a citation with a reference that is about them, and is independent of them, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS, and is significant coverage. Please also see WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources and WP:SELFPUB which has clear limitations on self published sources. Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact cited, that meet these tough criteria is likely to make this draft a clear acceptance (0.9 probability). Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the person is not suitable for inclusion, certainly today.

All inline links should be removed, please, and turned into references if appropriate, Wikilinks, or external links in a section so named. See Wikipedia:External links

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dragoslav Djukanovic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dragoslav Djukanovic, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:06, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dragoslav Djukanovic

Hello, Natacha art. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dragoslav Djukanovic, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dragoslav Djukanovic

Hello, Natacha art. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dragoslav Djukanovic".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:22, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dragoslav Djukanovic (October 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ldm1954 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I strongly suspect that he is very notable. However, the current draft makes many claims without independent verification. For instance, I see no Google Scholar profile to validate the claim of 324 papers or 44 books. (I suspect he edited many conference proceedings, but those don't really count.) Similarly saying he has 50 awards is not enough. The way WP:NACADEMIC and WP:N work is that without independent sources, claims are considered false. Guilty until proven innocent. Please do a major rewrite.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dragoslav Djukanovic and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ldm1954 (talk) 14:39, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]