Jump to content

User talk:Nartenn

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Umnico (June 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Fancy Refrigerator were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 01:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Nartenn! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 01:08, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, how do references 1, 2 and 5 not count as WP:PRIMARY? Please, review the submission, so that the article can be published. Thanks Nartenn (talk) 07:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Umnico has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Umnico. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:49, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So the issue is not the sources but the word 'solution'. That's insightful. Thanks. Nartenn (talk) 07:54, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sources are also an issue, the draft should report what reliable independent sources say about the company and show how they meet WP:NCORP. Theroadislong (talk) 08:02, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Umnico has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Umnico. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 08:04, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
5 references to its own website does not undermine the credibility of 5 other references to reliable independent sources. Nartenn (talk) 08:13, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The other 5 are VERY poor quality, Benzinga is a press release, so not independent, G2.com and Companies House are listings so not independent and Crunchbase is not reliable, in effect you have nothing to base an article on here. Theroadislong (talk) 08:27, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Umnico

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Nartenn. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Umnico, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Umnico

[edit]

Hello, Nartenn. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Umnico".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 09:08, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]